元明中央政府治藏宗教政策不同特点成因探析
发布时间:2019-03-18 14:17
【摘要】:西藏自元朝正式纳入中央政府直接管辖后,元明两朝中央政府都十分重视对这一地区的治理,特别在治藏宗教政策上,呈现出既有共性,又个性分明的特点。元朝"独依一派""政教合一"与明朝"多封众建""政教区分"的治藏宗教政策貌似背道而驰,但其结果却是殊途同归,实现了两代中央王朝对西藏地方的有效治理。正所谓"治边先稳藏",虽具体措施、方式有所不同,但却都富有成效性和延续性。
[Abstract]:Since the Yuan Dynasty was formally brought into the direct jurisdiction of the central government, the central governments of the Yuan and Ming dynasties have attached great importance to the governance of the region, especially in the religious policy of governing Tibet, showing both common and distinct characteristics. The religious policy of ruling Tibet by "relying on one faction alone" and "integrating politics and religion" in the Yuan Dynasty ran counter to the religious policy of ruling Tibet in the Ming Dynasty. However, the result was the same result, which realized the effective governance of Tibet by two generations of central dynasties. The so-called "border control first stability", although specific measures, methods are different, but they are full of cost-effectiveness and continuity.
【作者单位】: 西藏大学文学院;
【基金】:西藏自治区哲学社会科学资金项目“元明清中央政府治藏宗教政策研究”(项目批准号:13BMZ002)阶段性成果
【分类号】:D635.1;K23
本文编号:2442942
[Abstract]:Since the Yuan Dynasty was formally brought into the direct jurisdiction of the central government, the central governments of the Yuan and Ming dynasties have attached great importance to the governance of the region, especially in the religious policy of governing Tibet, showing both common and distinct characteristics. The religious policy of ruling Tibet by "relying on one faction alone" and "integrating politics and religion" in the Yuan Dynasty ran counter to the religious policy of ruling Tibet in the Ming Dynasty. However, the result was the same result, which realized the effective governance of Tibet by two generations of central dynasties. The so-called "border control first stability", although specific measures, methods are different, but they are full of cost-effectiveness and continuity.
【作者单位】: 西藏大学文学院;
【基金】:西藏自治区哲学社会科学资金项目“元明清中央政府治藏宗教政策研究”(项目批准号:13BMZ002)阶段性成果
【分类号】:D635.1;K23
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李干;;元代宗教政策简论[J];中南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1983年01期
2 施光明;;论唐代宗教政策[J];陕西师大学报(哲学社会科学版);1985年01期
3 陈杉;刘康乐;;试论元代的宗教政策与宗教管理体制[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年05期
4 何春明;;浅议唐朝的宗教政策及其执行——以佛教为例[J];黑龙江史志;2010年23期
5 韩小忙;略论西夏的宗教政策[J];青海民族学院学报;1999年01期
6 胡巧竞;;论明朝的藏区宗教政策对甘孜藏区经济发展的影响[J];四川民族学院学报;2010年02期
7 陶明选;;论明代宗教政策的宽容特色[J];兰州学刊;2007年11期
8 郭益海;;蒙古统治西域时宗教政策特点探析[J];世界宗教研究;2011年03期
9 施光明;;国家立寺 本欲安宁社稷——漫谈唐代的宗教政策[J];文史知识;1995年05期
10 李刚;试论十六国政府宗教政策[J];四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1989年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 杨绍猷;;蒙古族的早期信仰和成吉思汗的宗教政策[A];中国蒙古史学会论文选集(1981)[C];1981年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 周爽;元代国家宗教政策初探[D];辽宁师范大学;2011年
2 山花;简论元朝时期宗教政策与宗教立法[D];内蒙古大学;2014年
3 郭学勤;北宋宗教政策研究[D];河南大学;2003年
,本文编号:2442942
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2442942.html