奥克肖特论政治思想史研究

发布时间：2018-02-23 18:17

本文关键词： 奥克肖特政治思想之内涵政治思想之解释纯粹的思想史实践的思想史　出处：《史学月刊》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：迈克尔·奥克肖特是20世纪英美学界治政治思想史名家。相比于此领域几种主要的研究路径,其对政治思想史研究所作的反思和讨论具有独到的学术价值,因而不容忽视。第一,奥克肖特认为,政治思想之内涵不是单义的,不可以定义的方式把握之,而需要在学术传统中探寻政治思想的范围。第二,因为政治思想具有不同的层次,所以政治思想史研究中历史的观点和哲学的观点可以并行不悖。第三,奥克肖特反对一种找寻作者式的研究路径,但其观点与伽达默尔的诠释学亦有所分别。第四,奥克肖特批评政治思想史研究中实践考量的渗入,而提倡一种为历史而历史的纯粹研究的态度。当然,奥克肖特式的融贯论没有完全解决历史真实性的问题,历史与实践两分的哲学构想,也缺少必要的学理支撑,这是其政治思想史研究的局限所在。
[Abstract]:In 20th century, Michael Oakchott was a famous scholar in the history of political thought in the British and American academic circles. Compared with several major research paths in this field, Michael Oakchott had unique academic value in the reflection and discussion of the history of political thought research. So it can't be ignored. First, Oakchott believes that the meaning of political thought is not monologue, can not be defined way to grasp it, but need to explore the scope of political thought in the academic tradition. Second, Because there are different levels of political thought, the historical and philosophical perspectives in the study of the history of political thought can go hand in hand. But his point of view is also different from Gadamer's hermeneutics. 4th, Oakchott criticized the infiltration of practical considerations in the study of the history of political thought, and advocated an attitude of pure study of history for the sake of history. Oakchott's theory of integration has not completely solved the problem of historical authenticity, the philosophical conception of history and practice, and the lack of necessary theoretical support, which is the limitation of his research on the history of political thought.
【作者单位】：河海大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务经费课题“萧公权与中国政治思想史的构建”(2015B29814)
【分类号】：D092

【相似文献】