权利和权力概念的解构与统一:一种新的规范分析的进路

发布时间：2018-02-27 00:25

本文关键词： 权利权力法律之力信托公共利益　出处：《理论与改革》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：法律上的力只能以人为作用对象,而法律上的人存在权利主体和权力主体两种类型。以此作为起点和解析的工具,权利和权力被解构为权和利(力)的两个层次。权的概念成为权利与权力的第一个统一性要素,并以此为基础揭示出主体的统一性和法律之力的统一性。通过分析权利和权力的形成过程,可以发现权利对权力的决定意义。权力的产生来源于权利主体维护、增益自身权利的需要,并因此而导致权力主体的诞生。权力主体的双重身份造成权利主体无法回避的逻辑缺陷,并进而形成两类主体之间的三种相互关系:权力关系、权利关系和信托关系。以虚拟的共有主体为委托人,权力主体的权利主体身份为受托人,权利主体的每个个体为受益人,三方以权利集为信托财产建立的信托关系,可以为当代社会公共现象的解释提供一个有益的分析范式。由于信托结构的完整依赖于虚拟的共有主体概念,因而其存在不稳定性。这种不稳定性恰是公共管理存在制度供给需求的原因。
[Abstract]:The legal force can only be taken as the object of human action, while the legal person has two types: the subject of right and the subject of power. Right and power are deconstructed as two levels of power and power. The concept of right becomes the first element of unity between right and power. By analyzing the forming process of right and power, we can find the decisive significance of right to power, and the generation of power comes from the maintenance of subject of right. The need to gain one's own rights leads to the birth of the power subject. The dual identity of the power subject leads to the logical defects which can not be avoided by the power subject, and then forms three kinds of mutual relations between the two kinds of subjects: power relationship, The relationship between rights and trust. The trust relationship established by three parties takes the virtual common subject as the trustor, the power subject as the trustee, each individual of the right subject as the beneficiary, and the right set as the trust property. It can provide a useful analytical paradigm for the interpretation of contemporary social public phenomena. Since the integrity of trust structure depends on the virtual concept of common subject, Therefore, there is instability, which is the reason of the institutional supply and demand of public management.
【作者单位】：上海政法学院;
【基金】：倪振峰主持、作者参与主研的“上海市教育委员会重点学科建设项目”(项目编号:J52101)的阶段性阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D035

【参考文献】