最低限度的全球正义——论不伤害的消极责任和制度型人权

发布时间：2018-03-06 22:24

本文选题：制度型　切入点：正义理论　出处：《哲学动态》2014年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正当代政治哲学家涛慕思·博格(Thomas Pogge)的全球正义理论着重探讨了当前全球严重贫困现象为何存在以及谁应为之承担责任。~([1])他认为,富裕国家及其富裕公民把不公正的全球秩序强加在全球穷人身上并从这种秩序中获益,从而违反了不伤害的消极责任,所以应改革不公正的全球秩序,前者对后者作出补偿。他的这种立场挑战了"富裕国家及其公民应对全球穷人承担的道德责任限于‘援助'的积极责任"这种观点,由此引发的讨论和争论经久不息。艾利森·M.贾加尔(Alison M.Jaggar)指出,博格的著作《世界贫困与人权:世界主义责任与改革》2002年初版后立即成为经典,并成为研究
[Abstract]:The modern political philosopher Thomas Poggeh's theory of global justice focuses on why the current global poverty exists and who is responsible for it ([1]). That the rich countries and their rich citizens impose an unjust global order on and benefit from the global poor, thereby violating the negative responsibility of non-harm, and that the unjust global order should be reformed, The former compensates for the latter. His position challenges the view that the moral responsibility of rich countries and their citizens towards the global poor is limited to the positive responsibility of 'aid'. The discussions and arguments that have ensued have continued. Alison M. Jaggara, Allison M. Jaggar, pointed out that Berg's book, World Poverty and Human Rights: cosmopolitan responsibility and Reform, became a classic and research immediately after its first edition in 2002.
【作者单位】：南京大学哲学系;上海社会科学院信息研究所;
【基金】：中国社会科学院文献信息中心2007年课题“正义视角下的世界贫困、文化多样性与个体的基本自由”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D082

【参考文献】