论公共行政工具性推理的实质性转换

发布时间：2018-03-22 11:22

本文选题：公共行政　切入点：工具性推理　出处：《中国行政管理》2013年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：公共行政的工具性推理是在科学管理主义思潮、价值中立原则和理性官僚制理论影响下,形成的一种说明性的演绎思维模式和决策方法,期望可以通过科学与理性建立起来的推理工具来解决一切政策问题。然而,工具性推理的局限性决定了其"理性设计"与行政实践之间的差异性,使得这种理性方法无法适应不断发展的公共行政的需要、不能解决行政实践中存在的紧张与冲突。公共行政决策与法律推理一样,具有实践理性的特征,学习与借鉴法律实质推理为公共行政问题的解决提供了可供选择的思考与推理路径。公共行政领域实质性推理的兴起说明公共行政研究与实践必须包含价值理性,公共行政决策过程是工具性推理与实质性推理有机统一的过程。
[Abstract]:The instrumental reasoning of public administration is an illustrative deductive thinking mode and decision-making method under the influence of scientific managementism, the principle of value neutrality and the theory of rational bureaucracy. It is expected that all policy problems can be solved by means of reasoning tools established by science and reason. However, the limitation of instrumental reasoning determines the difference between rational design and administrative practice. As a result, this rational method can not adapt to the needs of developing public administration, and can not solve the tension and conflict existing in administrative practice. Public administrative decision-making, like legal reasoning, has the characteristics of practical rationality. The study and reference of legal substantive reasoning provide alternative ways of thinking and reasoning for solving public administration problems. The rise of substantive reasoning in the field of public administration shows that the research and practice of public administration must include value rationality. The decision-making process of public administration is an organic unity of instrumental reasoning and substantive reasoning.
【作者单位】：郑州大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“公共行政核心价值研究”(项目编号:09BZZ026) 河南省教育厅人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“以公共行政正义最大化为约束条件的服务型政府绩效评估体系优化研究”(项目编号:2010-JD-008)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D035

【共引文献】