清季“革”、“保”论战与共和观念的演进

发布时间：2018-04-09 01:30

  本文选题：《民报》　切入点：《新民丛报》　出处：《浙江学刊》2017年04期

【摘要】：以"共和"为中心考查清季《民报》与《新民丛报》的论战,可以进一步把握当时的学理以及双方论争的意涵。在清廷有意变政和朝野关于国体政体选择莫衷一是的情势下,《民报》旗帜宣明地主张民权立宪政体,不仅与古代的共和相区分,而且避免与共和专制相牵混,防止造成立宪与共和为政体演进不同阶段的假象。而从鼓吹共和一步退到开明专制的梁启超,依据波伦哈克的理论,根本否认中国国民具备共和资格,希望由开明专制养成。其纯由逻辑推理论辩,无法绕过清廷不愿开明革新的现实,不战而败。
[Abstract]:Taking the Republic as the center, we can further grasp the academic theory and the meaning of the controversy between the Qing Dynasty and Xinmin Cong.Under the situation that the Qing government intended to change politics and the ruling and opposition parties had different views on the choice of the state system of government, the banner of the "people's Daily" clearly advocated the constitutional regime of civil rights, which was not only distinguished from the ancient republicanism, but also avoided being confused with the Republican autocracy.To prevent the formation of constitutionalism and republic for the different stages of the evolution of the system of government illusion.Liang Qichao, who retreated from advocating republicanism to enlightened autocracy, according to Polenhak's theory, denied that Chinese people had Republican qualifications and hoped to be nurtured by enlightened autocracy.Its purely logical reasoning argument, can not bypass the Qing Dynasty is unwilling to open the reality of innovation, failure to fight.
【作者单位】： 中山大学历史系;
【分类号】：D092
，

本文编号：1724261