巴里巴尔政治哲学研究

发布时间：2018-06-04 01:32

  本文选题：巴里巴尔 + 阿尔都塞　； 参考：《南京大学》2014年博士论文

【摘要】：本文以"巴里巴尔政治哲学研究"为题,立足于巴里巴尔文本,旨在于揭示长期被国内外学界忽视的巴里巴尔政治哲学思想。这一研究的重要意义在于填补巴里巴尔学术研究的理论空白,把一直鲜为人知的巴里巴尔形象揭示出来,并有助于我们全面了解阿尔都塞及其团队的理论转向。论文的主要贡献和创新之处在于:(1)从法国当代哲学同德国古典哲学语境的差异角度,探讨阿尔都塞为什么会超越黑格尔和费尔巴哈,将斯宾诺莎哲学作为马克思思想的源头。(2)从巴里巴尔与阿尔都塞思想的差异中,寻求巴里巴尔理论转向的意义,及其对阿尔都塞思想发展的影响。(3)立足于巴里巴尔文本和斯宾诺莎文本,全面揭示巴里巴尔对斯宾诺莎政治哲学的吸收与发展。(4)始终坚持历史唯物主义的方法论,对巴里巴尔的历史唯物主义政治化的解读进行反思和批判,进一步深化历史唯物主义方法论的当代意义。(5)从思想史的角度,勾勒斯宾诺莎政治哲学概念如何转化成当今巴里巴尔政治哲学概念,并辅之以时代背景,突出概念变迁的历史内涵。基于上述目标,本文除导论以外分为四章。第一章,探讨了巴里巴尔和阿尔都塞的学术传承关系,巴里巴尔如何进一步深化阿尔都塞提出的但没有深入展开的问题。阿尔都塞认为要成为真正的马克思主义者,必须超越德国古典哲学,回到斯宾诺莎哲学,巴里巴尔按照这条思路,从阶级断裂、政治斗争角度,将阿尔都塞的断裂说发展成阶级断裂说。第二章,从文本学的角度梳理巴里巴尔的《斯宾诺莎与政治》及其所对应的三本著作《神学政治论》、《政治论》和《伦理学》,探讨斯宾诺莎政治哲学对巴里巴尔的影响。斯宾诺莎的"政治体"成了巴里巴尔建构国家与个人关系的理论基础,巴里巴尔从民主最大化,统治阶级统治的角度,将政治统治问题转化为政治伦理问题,并引入人类学视角来重释认同问题。第三章,巴里巴尔对历史唯物主义的政治化解读,始终是为了寻求当代激进解放的民主话语,他从阶级与意识形态两条线索否定了无产阶级充当历史主体的可能性,彻底解构历史本质论,从个体斗争的角度,将个体的认同与个体同权力的斗争结合起来,历史将不再是充满矛盾具有历史发生学意义的历史,成了片段化的政治主体斗争的历史,历史唯物主义转化成政治唯物主义。第四章,巴里巴尔描述资本主义全球化时代劳动主体在非阶级领域的差异与不平等,提出与经济全球化相适应的政治全球化的主张,强调在差异中寻求认同,形成超越身份差异的全球公民,并以欧洲为模板,打造超越欧洲边界的"新欧洲公民",虽然,他的本意是形成群众的绝对民主,结果却成了精英统治的新话语。
[Abstract]:With the title of "the study of Balbaal's political philosophy", based on the Balebar text, this paper aims to reveal the thought of Balebar's political philosophy which has long been neglected by scholars at home and abroad. The significance of this study is to fill in the theoretical gap of Barry Barr's academic research, to reveal the image of Barry Barr, which has been unknown for a long time, and to help us fully understand the theoretical turn of Althusser and his team. The main contribution and innovation of the thesis lies in: (1) from the perspective of the differences between contemporary French philosophy and German classical philosophy, this paper explores why Althusser surpasses Hegel and Feuerbach, and explores why Althusser surpasses Hegel and Feuerbach. Taking Spinoza's philosophy as the source of Marx's thought, from the difference between Barry Barr's and Althusser's thought, the author seeks the significance of the turn of Barry Barr's theory. And its influence on the development of Althusser's thought. 3) based on the Balabar and Spinoza texts, it reveals in an all-round way the absorption and development of Spinoza's political philosophy by Bari Barr) and always adheres to the methodology of historical materialism. Reflecting on and criticizing the interpretation of the politicization of historical materialism by Barry Barr, and further deepening the contemporary significance of the methodology of historical materialism.) from the perspective of the history of thought, This paper outlines how Spinoza's concept of political philosophy is transformed into the concept of political philosophy of Bari Barr nowadays, supplemented by the background of the times, and highlights the historical connotation of the change of concepts. Based on the above objectives, this paper is divided into four chapters except the introduction. The first chapter discusses the relationship between Barry Barr and Althusser, and how to deepen the problems raised by Althusser. Althusser believed that in order to become a true Marxist, he must go beyond classical German philosophy and return to Spinoza's philosophy. Develop Althusser's theory of fracture into class theory. In the second chapter, from the perspective of textology, the author discusses the influence of Spinoza's political philosophy on Bari Barr's political philosophy by combing Balabar's Spinoza and Politics and his corresponding three books, "Theological Politics", "political Theory" and "Ethics". Spinoza's "political body" has become the theoretical basis for the construction of the relationship between the state and the individual. From the point of view of democracy maximization and ruling class rule, Barbibal transforms the issue of political rule into a political ethical issue. And the introduction of anthropological perspective to re-explain the issue of identity. In the third chapter, Bari Barr's political interpretation of historical materialism is always for the purpose of seeking the democratic discourse of contemporary radical liberation. He denies the possibility of the proletariat acting as the subject of history from two clues of class and ideology. By thoroughly deconstructing the historical essence theory and combining individual identity with individual power struggle from the angle of individual struggle, history will no longer be a history full of contradictions with historical significance. It has become the history of the struggle of the political subject, and the historical materialism has been transformed into the political materialism. The fourth chapter describes the differences and inequalities of labor subjects in the non-class field in the era of capitalist globalization, and puts forward the idea of political globalization, which is compatible with economic globalization, and emphasizes seeking identification among the differences. To form a global citizen who transcends identity differences and uses Europe as a template to create a "new European citizen" who transcends Europe's borders, although his intention was to form absolute democracy for the masses, it turned out to be a new discourse of elite rule.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D0
，

本文编号：1975221