关于布哈林帝国主义理论的研究
发布时间：2018-08-12 16:18
【摘要】：众所周知,马克思主义帝国主义理论的创立者是列宁,但关于帝国主义的研究的滥觞不是列宁。在对帝国主义研究的开始到马克思主义帝国主义理论的形成的历史过程中,涌现出不少有创见的研究者,如霍布森、希法亭、卢森堡等,他们已经提出帝国主义的某些本质特点。当然,作为马克思主义帝国主义理论的探索者布哈林也为科学理论的创立做出了重大的贡献。 布哈林的帝国主义理论是马克思主义理论的重要内容之一,也是马克思主义政治经济学的重要组成部分。虽然已经有很多学者对这一理论进行了研究,但是本文在前人研究成果的基础上力争在布哈林的历史局限性和时代意义上有所突破。首先本文着重从布哈林帝国主义理论的形成、内容、历史局限性及时代意义展开阐述。布哈林研究帝国主义理论是在第一次世界大战期间进行的,这一时期的经济政治形势极其复杂;再者在他之前或与他同时代己经有理论家开始研究帝国主义,对布哈林产生了重要影响,所以弄清布哈林帝国主义理论形成的历史环境和理论环境是研究布哈林帝国主义理论的基本前提。其次,本文对理论的内容进行了深入地分析。由于布哈林帝国主义理论是把资本主义经济形态,即帝国主义放在世界经济范围内作为一个整体考察的,因此本文先从布哈林对世界经济的阐述说起,接着论述他关于世界经济与资本国际化、资本民族化的研究。在此基础上又重点论述了布哈林对帝国主义的认识：帝国主义是金融资本主义的政策等。在历史局限性上,本文主要通过对布哈林帝国主义理论与列宁帝国主义理论在研究方法论、帝国主义的定义、帝国主义与民族问题及无产阶级革命问题上的不同看法着重的比较,进一步说明布哈林帝国主义理论的历史局限性和列宁帝国主义理论的科学性。 最后,本文着重论述了布哈林帝国主义理论的当代意义。一方面布哈林在研究帝国主义理论的过程中所使用的研究方法仍然对我们研究当代帝国主义理论有重大的指导意义,同时布哈林对帝国主义垄断性的研究,提醒我们在经济全球化深入发展的时代,虽然昔日的战火硝烟减少了,但是发达资本主义国家的帝国主义行径仍然存在。尽管当代帝国主义的垄断组织的形式和内部的结构发生了很大变化,但是它仍具有垄断性,仍对社会生产有破坏作用,这更是暴露出资本主义的种种弊端；另一方面,布哈林对帝国主义的研究实质上也是对资本主义的研究,他指出,在社会主义建设的过程中,要吸收资本主义的文明成果,加强与西方资本主义国家的联系和交往。这一论断对我们正确认识和处理资本主义与社会主义的关系大有裨益。作为社会主义大国,在国家综合实力还不如发达资本主义国家的情况下,我国不仅要充分认识两种制度之间的矛盾和斗争,以及两制和平共处的长期性和相互合作的必要性,警惕资本主义的“和平演变”；还要积极地学习和借鉴资本主义的先进经验和文明成果,只有这样我们才能更好地维护我国的国家安全,更好地参与世界。
[Abstract]:As we all know, the founder of Marxist imperialist theory is Lenin, but the origin of the study of imperialism is not Lenin. In the historical process from the beginning of the study of imperialism to the formation of Marxist imperialist theory, many innovative researchers have emerged, such as Hobson, Hiffating, Luxembourg and so on. They have already done so. Some essential characteristics of imperialism are put forward. Of course, Bukharin, the explorer of Marxist imperialist theory, has made great contributions to the creation of scientific theory.
Bukharin's theory of imperialism is one of the important contents of Marxist theory as well as an important part of Marxist political economy. First of all, this paper focuses on the formation, content, historical limitations and significance of Bukharin's theory of imperialism. Bukharin's study of the theory of imperialism was carried out during the First World War, during which the economic and political situation was extremely complex; and then he had theorists before him or at his time. Studying imperialism has an important influence on Bukharin, so it is the basic premise to study Bukharin's theory of imperialism to understand the historical environment and theoretical environment in which Bukharin's theory of imperialism came into being. This paper begins with Bukharin's exposition of the world economy, then discusses Bukharin's research on the world economy, the internationalization of capital and the nationalization of capital. In terms of historical limitations, this paper mainly compares Bukharin's theory of imperialism with Lenin's theory of imperialism in terms of research methodology, definition of imperialism, different views on imperialism and national issues and proletarian revolution, and further explains the history of Bukharin's theory of imperialism. Limitations and the scientific nature of Lenin's theory of imperialism.
In the end, this paper focuses on the contemporary significance of Bukharin's imperialist theory. On the one hand, the research methods used by Bukharin in the process of studying imperialist theory are still of great guiding significance to our study of contemporary imperialist theory. On the other hand, Bukharin's study of imperialist monopoly reminds us of the global economy. In the era of deepening development, although the fires and smoke of war in the past have been reduced, the imperialist acts of the developed capitalist countries still exist. Although the form and internal structure of the monopoly organizations of contemporary imperialism have undergone great changes, they still have monopoly and still have a destructive effect on social production, which exposes the contribution of capital. On the other hand, Bukharin's study of imperialism is essentially a study of capitalism. He pointed out that in the process of socialist construction, we should absorb the achievements of capitalist civilization and strengthen our contacts with the western capitalist countries. This assertion gives us a correct understanding and handling of capitalists. The relationship between justice and socialism is of great benefit. As a big socialist country, the overall strength of the country is inferior to that of the developed capitalist countries, China should not only fully understand the contradictions and struggles between the two systems, but also the long-term nature of peaceful coexistence and the necessity of mutual cooperation between the two systems, and be vigilant against the "peaceful evolution" of capitalism. Only in this way can we better safeguard our national security and better participate in the world.
【学位授予单位】：陕西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D091
本文编号：2179596
[Abstract]:As we all know, the founder of Marxist imperialist theory is Lenin, but the origin of the study of imperialism is not Lenin. In the historical process from the beginning of the study of imperialism to the formation of Marxist imperialist theory, many innovative researchers have emerged, such as Hobson, Hiffating, Luxembourg and so on. They have already done so. Some essential characteristics of imperialism are put forward. Of course, Bukharin, the explorer of Marxist imperialist theory, has made great contributions to the creation of scientific theory.
Bukharin's theory of imperialism is one of the important contents of Marxist theory as well as an important part of Marxist political economy. First of all, this paper focuses on the formation, content, historical limitations and significance of Bukharin's theory of imperialism. Bukharin's study of the theory of imperialism was carried out during the First World War, during which the economic and political situation was extremely complex; and then he had theorists before him or at his time. Studying imperialism has an important influence on Bukharin, so it is the basic premise to study Bukharin's theory of imperialism to understand the historical environment and theoretical environment in which Bukharin's theory of imperialism came into being. This paper begins with Bukharin's exposition of the world economy, then discusses Bukharin's research on the world economy, the internationalization of capital and the nationalization of capital. In terms of historical limitations, this paper mainly compares Bukharin's theory of imperialism with Lenin's theory of imperialism in terms of research methodology, definition of imperialism, different views on imperialism and national issues and proletarian revolution, and further explains the history of Bukharin's theory of imperialism. Limitations and the scientific nature of Lenin's theory of imperialism.
In the end, this paper focuses on the contemporary significance of Bukharin's imperialist theory. On the one hand, the research methods used by Bukharin in the process of studying imperialist theory are still of great guiding significance to our study of contemporary imperialist theory. On the other hand, Bukharin's study of imperialist monopoly reminds us of the global economy. In the era of deepening development, although the fires and smoke of war in the past have been reduced, the imperialist acts of the developed capitalist countries still exist. Although the form and internal structure of the monopoly organizations of contemporary imperialism have undergone great changes, they still have monopoly and still have a destructive effect on social production, which exposes the contribution of capital. On the other hand, Bukharin's study of imperialism is essentially a study of capitalism. He pointed out that in the process of socialist construction, we should absorb the achievements of capitalist civilization and strengthen our contacts with the western capitalist countries. This assertion gives us a correct understanding and handling of capitalists. The relationship between justice and socialism is of great benefit. As a big socialist country, the overall strength of the country is inferior to that of the developed capitalist countries, China should not only fully understand the contradictions and struggles between the two systems, but also the long-term nature of peaceful coexistence and the necessity of mutual cooperation between the two systems, and be vigilant against the "peaceful evolution" of capitalism. Only in this way can we better safeguard our national security and better participate in the world.
【学位授予单位】：陕西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D091
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王音;;战后帝国主义的新特征[J];国外理论动态;2007年06期
2 郑异凡;对“超帝国主义”理论的批判和留下的问题[J];世界历史;1995年06期
3 徐崇温;;当代资本主义处于什么发展阶段——是国家垄断资本主义还是国际垄断资本主义[J];红旗文稿;2005年09期
4 罗文东;王金存;;当代资本主义的新变化及其实质[J];红旗文稿;2006年05期
5 罗文东;论当代资本主义的发展对社会主义的影响[J];教学与研究;2003年09期
6 卡尔·翁格尔;刘建设;;帝国主义理论[J];马克思主义与现实;2006年05期
7 陈其人;;布哈林的世界经济和帝国主义理论[J];上海社会科学院学术季刊;1988年03期
8 庞仁芝;;当代资本主义发展阶段的再认识[J];中国特色社会主义研究;2010年02期
9 李景治;积极借鉴人类政治文明的有益成果[J];学术界;2003年05期
10 罗文东;当代资本主义的新变化与世界社会主义的发展前景[J];马克思主义研究;2003年04期
，本文编号：2179596
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2179596.html
