政治现实主义的政治非现实性

发布时间：2018-08-13 17:24

【摘要】：一些声称揭示政治真实本性的话语和论述一次又一次地出现,试图对主导各类规范政治哲学的抽象、乐观和理想化的政治理论发起挑战。然而它们总是趋向保守、空洞抑或无知,不能达到它们所承诺的目标。这种情况并非由理想政治理论的复苏所致,而是各种形式的政治现实主义对政治领域可查明的实际特征远没有达到充分处理的水平。政治现实主义者们缩减了政治之域的复杂性,使之局限于权力的宏观讨论,以及重新引入他们本人尝试远离的伦理关怀,并完全忽视情感之域与在地话语。尤其晚近的现实主义者们在做的不是阐释性的分析,而是规导性的分析,把民主理想与人文理想看做一个现实主义进路的地基,而忽视这样一个事实:对政治之域的妥当理解不能被缩减成这些特征。
[Abstract]:Some words and argumentations that claim to reveal the true nature of politics appear again and again, attempting to challenge the abstract, optimistic and idealized political theories that dominate various normative political philosophies. Yet they tend to be conservative, empty or ignorant, unable to achieve their promised goals. This situation is not caused by the revival of ideal political theory, but by the fact that various forms of political realism are far from fully dealing with the practical characteristics that can be identified in the political field. The political realists have reduced the complexity of the political domain, confined it to the macro discussion of power, reintroduced the ethical concern they have tried to avoid, and completely ignored the emotional domain and the discourse in the ground. What the more recent realists are doing, in particular, is not an explanatory analysis, but a formal analysis, which regards democratic ideals and humanistic ideals as the foundation of a realistic approach. Ignoring the fact that a proper understanding of the realm of politics cannot be reduced to these characteristics.
【作者单位】：英国诺丁汉大学政治学与国际关系学院;
【分类号】：D0

【相似文献】