批判与超越——精英民主理论评析
[Abstract]:As an important part of modern and contemporary western democratic theory, elite democracy theory is based on the perspective of traditional liberalism for more than a hundred years since its birth to explain and reconstruct the western democratic system. Form the democratic view which is different from the classical democracy and pay attention to the research paradigm of empirical research. There is no doubt that the theory of elite democracy has played a certain role in the process of breaking the situation of monopolistic discourse hegemony of single traditional liberalism and moving towards the coexistence of pluralistic democratic theory with liberalism as the main body. It has had a great influence on the path of democracy seeking by the democratic people in the 20th century, and has shown some regularity in the process of development. In a sense, the evolution of elite democratic theory can be regarded as a microcosm of the evolution of western democratic theory system in the whole 20th century. Although the theory of elite democracy has irreplaceable significance and value, however, due to the influence of its own characteristics and the restriction of some realistic political reasons, it has been studied in the past in China. The research on elite democracy has not received due attention, and the evaluation is biased. In order to remedy this shortcoming, this paper attempts to systematically comb the process and law of the emergence, development and evolution of the western elite democratic theory, and on the basis of summarizing its basic views, this paper focuses on its competitive democracy theory. At the same time, by analyzing the relationship between elite democracy, liberal democracy and pluralistic democracy, The theory of elite democracy is analyzed from the perspective of the transformation of western democratic theory in the whole 20th century. For Chinese democratic researchers, the greatest value of elite democratic theory lies in providing an analytical perspective of democratic theory. Of course, Nor should we ignore the dual defects of the basic theory and research paradigm determined by its class position and original intention of argumentation. This paper aims to evaluate its value and analyze its limitations objectively and comprehensively, and use it as a breakthrough point to transcend the discourse platform constructed by elite democracy theory, and give a new answer to how to understand and interpret democracy.
【学位授予单位】:中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D082
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 柴德让;;威权主义与民主转型——基于东南亚国家的视角分析[J];北京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2009年03期
2 于建嵘;精英政治的困惑[J];博览群书;2005年03期
3 郭为桂;;现代性与大众民主的逻辑——马克斯·韦伯的政治社会学分析[J];东南学术;2007年03期
4 陈峰君;威权主义概念与成因[J];东南亚研究;2000年04期
5 常征;新加坡:权威主义,还是精英民主?[J];东南亚研究;2005年04期
6 库泽科;季塔连科;庞大鹏;;俄罗斯学者对中国政治的权威主义与民主问题的认识与思考[J];当代世界社会主义问题;2007年02期
7 苏文;不要民粹主义,但能要“精英主义”吗?[J];读书;1997年10期
8 邓金艳;;精英政治与民主政治[J];法制与社会;2007年12期
9 马欢欢;;罗伯特·米歇尔斯及其“寡头统治铁律”的探讨[J];法制与社会;2009年15期
10 范莉;;浅论中国的权威主义的演变[J];法制与社会;2009年24期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 陈伟 北京大学博士;[N];中国图书商报;2003年
2 刘启云;[N];学习时报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 钟彬;达尔的多元主义民主理论研究[D];南开大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 郭兆祥;达尔多元主义民主理论述评[D];吉林大学;2007年
2 王增益;熊彼特精英民主理论研究[D];华南师范大学;2007年
3 王毅;西方精英民主论探析[D];湖南师范大学;2008年
4 宋思涛;近代大众民主的兴起及其面临的困境[D];中国政法大学;2009年
5 常静;米歇尔斯寡头统治思想研究[D];天津师范大学;2009年
6 徐风;本杰明·巴伯的强势民主理论研究[D];天津师范大学;2009年
7 李慧敏;走出民主的误区[D];西南政法大学;2009年
,本文编号:2218501
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2218501.html