20世纪20年代初“社会主义论争”探析
发布时间:2018-10-22 15:35
【摘要】:发生于20世纪20年代初的马克思主义与基尔特社会主义的论争是马克思主义在中国早期传播过程中的历史事件,在早期马克思主义及其哲学中国化进程中占有重要地位。通过对“社会主义论争”的探析,可以进一步深化早期马克思主义及其哲学中国化问题的理论研究。 首先,本文详细介绍了论争爆发的背景和论争的具体过程。然后,依据丰富翔实的资料系统阐述了论争双方的主要论题及其观点。把论争的内容概括为中国能否立即实行社会主义、如何看待国内社会矛盾、如何发展实业及增强富力、如何看待用资本主义发展实业的后果和社会发展阶段等五大论题,进而分别对双方代表人物的主要观点进行论述。最后,,结合前面的内容和90年来的历史事实,评析了论争的性质、基尔特社会主义的性质、论争中的代表性观点以及论争的历史影响。 本文认为国内政治的黑暗引发的先进知识分子对社会发展道路的探索是论争爆发的内部因素。论争的实质是革命与改良的问题,基尔特社会主义者是一批改良主义者。基尔特社会主义者的观点中具有大量合理成分,而早期马克思主义者的观点存在一些不足和缺陷。论争促进了科学社会主义和唯物史观在中国的传播,为中国共产党的建立和中国革命的发展奠定了坚实的基础。论争对我国社会主义建设事业的启示有:第一,人们应该纠正对“社会主义”理解的偏差;第二,人们应该克服“社会主义建设”急功近利的心理;第三,人们应该用马克思主义哲学来指导科学社会主义的实践。
[Abstract]:The controversy between Marxism and Kilt Socialism, which occurred in the early 1920s, is a historical event in the early spreading process of Marxism in China, and plays an important role in the process of Sinicization of early Marxism and its philosophy. Through the analysis of the argument of Socialism, we can further deepen the theoretical research on the Sinicization of early Marxism and its philosophy. First of all, this paper introduces the background and the specific process of the controversy in detail. Then, according to the rich and detailed data system, the thesis expounds the main issues and viewpoints of both sides. The contents of the controversy are summarized as five major topics: whether China can immediately implement socialism, how to treat domestic social contradictions, how to develop industry and enhance wealth, how to treat the consequences of developing industry with capitalism and the stage of social development. Then the main viewpoints of the representatives of both sides are discussed respectively. Finally, based on the previous contents and the historical facts of the past 90 years, the author analyzes the nature of the controversy, the nature of Kilt socialism, the representative viewpoints in the debate and the historical influence of the controversy. This paper holds that the exploration of the way of social development by the advanced intellectuals caused by the darkness of domestic politics is the internal factor of the controversy. The essence of the controversy is the question of revolution and improvement, and the Kilt Socialists are a group of reformists. There are a lot of reasonable elements in the views of Kilt Socialists, while the views of early Marxists have some shortcomings and defects. The controversy promoted the spread of scientific socialism and historical materialism in China and laid a solid foundation for the establishment of the Communist Party of China and the development of the Chinese revolution. The implications of the controversy on the cause of socialist construction in China are as follows: first, people should correct the deviation in understanding "socialism"; second, people should overcome the mentality of "socialist construction" eager for quick success and instant benefit; third, People should use Marxist philosophy to guide the practice of scientific socialism.
【学位授予单位】:燕山大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D091.6
本文编号:2287561
[Abstract]:The controversy between Marxism and Kilt Socialism, which occurred in the early 1920s, is a historical event in the early spreading process of Marxism in China, and plays an important role in the process of Sinicization of early Marxism and its philosophy. Through the analysis of the argument of Socialism, we can further deepen the theoretical research on the Sinicization of early Marxism and its philosophy. First of all, this paper introduces the background and the specific process of the controversy in detail. Then, according to the rich and detailed data system, the thesis expounds the main issues and viewpoints of both sides. The contents of the controversy are summarized as five major topics: whether China can immediately implement socialism, how to treat domestic social contradictions, how to develop industry and enhance wealth, how to treat the consequences of developing industry with capitalism and the stage of social development. Then the main viewpoints of the representatives of both sides are discussed respectively. Finally, based on the previous contents and the historical facts of the past 90 years, the author analyzes the nature of the controversy, the nature of Kilt socialism, the representative viewpoints in the debate and the historical influence of the controversy. This paper holds that the exploration of the way of social development by the advanced intellectuals caused by the darkness of domestic politics is the internal factor of the controversy. The essence of the controversy is the question of revolution and improvement, and the Kilt Socialists are a group of reformists. There are a lot of reasonable elements in the views of Kilt Socialists, while the views of early Marxists have some shortcomings and defects. The controversy promoted the spread of scientific socialism and historical materialism in China and laid a solid foundation for the establishment of the Communist Party of China and the development of the Chinese revolution. The implications of the controversy on the cause of socialist construction in China are as follows: first, people should correct the deviation in understanding "socialism"; second, people should overcome the mentality of "socialist construction" eager for quick success and instant benefit; third, People should use Marxist philosophy to guide the practice of scientific socialism.
【学位授予单位】:燕山大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D091.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邸乘光;五四时期马克思主义在中国广泛传播的历史条件[J];安徽史学;1999年03期
2 王先俊;;论“五四”后的社会改造思潮[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2009年02期
3 张胜利;;罗素思想对中国“五四”时期的影响[J];中共长春市委党校学报;2006年02期
4 邓进;;早期中国共产党人与三大思潮的交锋[J];湖北省社会主义学院学报;2006年06期
5 杨阳;;试析基尔特社会主义在中国的传播[J];广西社会科学;2009年06期
6 徐松林;马克思主义在中国广泛传播的原因新探[J];景德镇高专学报;2002年01期
7 王明生;;罗素的两大命题与20世纪初社会主义论战的再审视[J];江苏社会科学;2010年02期
8 王红霞;;自由知识分子的社会主义诉求——略论20世纪20年代前后张东荪的心路历程[J];济宁学院学报;2008年04期
9 王涛;二十世纪初期中国选择马克思主义的社会动力[J];江西社会科学;2002年06期
10 宋连胜;侯建明;丁刚;;“社会主义论战”与早期马克思主义中国化[J];理论学刊;2008年06期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 孔朝霞;马克思主义中国化的早期探索研究[D];东北师范大学;2009年
2 张立影;中国共产党对资本主义认识的历史进程[D];中共中央党校;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 田小波;五四时期研究系社会改造思想述论[D];湖南大学;2009年
本文编号:2287561
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2287561.html