胡适和殷海光自由主义思想比较研究
发布时间：2018-11-20 15:20
【摘要】：在近代中国自由主义的发展史上,作为第二代和第三代的代表人物,胡适和殷海光都留下了浓墨重彩的一笔。胡适从五四时期起便“暴得大名”,此后一直被公认为是二十世纪上半叶中国自由主义的领袖和旗帜；殷海光则是二十世纪五十和六十年代台湾地区著名的政论家和自由主义思想家,被学界认为是和胡适齐名的自由主义大师。殷海光的学生,著名学者李敖曾把胡适和殷海光比作是陷在台岛上的两条蛟龙,并对两位大师无比钦佩。虽然两人都属于中国近代自由主义的谱系,但无论是在知识论基础上,还是自由主义思想的具体内容上,胡适和殷海光都有着非常大的区别,而且这并非偶然,在这区别的背后充分体现了近代中国自由主义发展的脉络和趋势,特别是西方的自由主义如何与中国的传统文化相结合、自由民主如何在本土得以落实等重要问题,在我们对胡适和殷海光的思想进行比较研究之后,或许就可以得到答案。 在结构上,本文拟分四章构成。第一部分是绪论,介绍论文的选题背景和研究现状。第一章从知识论基础的角度对胡适和殷海光的自由主义思想进行比较,挖掘出两人在指导思想上的根本差异。第二章分为四节,从自由的内涵、对个人主义的理解、经济自由以及自由主义和传统文化之间的关系四个方面对胡适和殷海光自由主义思想的具体内容进行比较分析。最后为结语,通过对两人自由主义思想的分析和比较,揭示出殷海光后期思想的全面转轨对于中国自由主义发展转进的重要意义。
[Abstract]:In the history of modern Chinese liberalism, Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang, as the representatives of the second and third generation, both left a heavy stroke. Hu Shi has been known as a violent man since the May 4th Movement, and has been recognized as the leader and banner of Chinese liberalism in the first half of the 20th century. Yin Haiguang is a famous political theorist and liberalism thinker in Taiwan in 1950s and 1960s. Yin Haiguang's students and famous scholar Li ao once compared Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang to two dragons trapped on the island of Taiwan and admired the two masters. Although both of them belong to the genealogy of Chinese modern liberalism, Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang are very different, not only by accident, but also on the basis of knowledge theory and on the concrete content of liberalism thought. Behind this distinction, it fully reflects the context and trend of the development of liberalism in modern China, especially the important issues such as how western liberalism combines with Chinese traditional culture and how freedom and democracy can be implemented locally. After our comparative study of Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang's thoughts, we may be able to get the answer. In structure, this paper is divided into four chapters. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the background and research status of the thesis. The first chapter compares Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang's liberalism thought from the angle of knowledge theory foundation, and excavates the fundamental difference between them in guiding ideology. The second chapter is divided into four sections, from the connotation of freedom, the understanding of individualism, economic freedom and the relationship between liberalism and traditional culture, the specific contents of Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang liberalism thought are compared and analyzed. Finally, the conclusion, through the analysis and comparison of the two liberalism thoughts, reveals the significance of the overall transformation of Yin Haiguang's late thought to the development of Chinese liberalism.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D092
本文编号：2345259
[Abstract]:In the history of modern Chinese liberalism, Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang, as the representatives of the second and third generation, both left a heavy stroke. Hu Shi has been known as a violent man since the May 4th Movement, and has been recognized as the leader and banner of Chinese liberalism in the first half of the 20th century. Yin Haiguang is a famous political theorist and liberalism thinker in Taiwan in 1950s and 1960s. Yin Haiguang's students and famous scholar Li ao once compared Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang to two dragons trapped on the island of Taiwan and admired the two masters. Although both of them belong to the genealogy of Chinese modern liberalism, Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang are very different, not only by accident, but also on the basis of knowledge theory and on the concrete content of liberalism thought. Behind this distinction, it fully reflects the context and trend of the development of liberalism in modern China, especially the important issues such as how western liberalism combines with Chinese traditional culture and how freedom and democracy can be implemented locally. After our comparative study of Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang's thoughts, we may be able to get the answer. In structure, this paper is divided into four chapters. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the background and research status of the thesis. The first chapter compares Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang's liberalism thought from the angle of knowledge theory foundation, and excavates the fundamental difference between them in guiding ideology. The second chapter is divided into four sections, from the connotation of freedom, the understanding of individualism, economic freedom and the relationship between liberalism and traditional culture, the specific contents of Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang liberalism thought are compared and analyzed. Finally, the conclusion, through the analysis and comparison of the two liberalism thoughts, reveals the significance of the overall transformation of Yin Haiguang's late thought to the development of Chinese liberalism.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D092
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 刘黎红;;“五四”时期两种整理国故活动的比较[J];东方论坛(青岛大学学报);2006年03期
2 俞祖华;赵慧峰;;从胡适到殷海光:近代自由主义的趋新与返古[J];河北学刊;2011年05期
3 陈先初;杨铮铮;;试论殷海光的中国文化观[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2007年05期
4 赵慧峰;俞祖华;;从严复到胡适:近代自由主义思潮的传承与调适[J];文史哲;2010年06期
5 任剑涛;以逻辑支撑信念——论殷海光自由主义的理论特质[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2005年04期
，本文编号：2345259
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2345259.html
