近代中国思想界对“平等”的误释——以康有为《大同书》为例
发布时间：2018-12-14 23:07
【摘要】：近代平等观念的传播是中国近代思想史上最有意义的事情。近代价值观念在中国社会得以落地生根的前提,是思想家在中国语境下加以解读从而使之能够为人们理解和接受。由于文化传统与个人知识背景的影响,中国思想家在解读近代平等观念的过程中也发生了种种误读。康有为是近代中国较早接受平等观念的思想家,其晚年所著《大同书》便集中体现了他对平等的理解。康有为所理解的"平等"是无差别的平等,这种平等得以实现的前提是彻底消灭社会成员之间的差别。用中国传统的平均主义观念诠释平等是康氏平等观念的误区之一。
[Abstract]:The spread of the concept of equality in modern times is the most significant thing in the history of modern Chinese thought. The premise for modern values to take root in Chinese society is for thinkers to interpret them in Chinese context so that they can be understood and accepted by people. Due to the influence of cultural tradition and personal knowledge background, Chinese thinkers also misread the concept of equality in modern times. Kang Youwei was a thinker who accepted the concept of equality earlier in modern China. His book Datong Book in his later years embodied his understanding of equality. Kang Youwei's understanding of "equality" is the equality without distinction, and the premise of the realization of equality is to eliminate the difference between the members of the society. Using the traditional equalitarianism to interpret equality is one of the misunderstandings of Kang's concept of equality.
【作者单位】： 南开大学周恩来政府管理学院;
【分类号】：D092;D081
[Abstract]:The spread of the concept of equality in modern times is the most significant thing in the history of modern Chinese thought. The premise for modern values to take root in Chinese society is for thinkers to interpret them in Chinese context so that they can be understood and accepted by people. Due to the influence of cultural tradition and personal knowledge background, Chinese thinkers also misread the concept of equality in modern times. Kang Youwei was a thinker who accepted the concept of equality earlier in modern China. His book Datong Book in his later years embodied his understanding of equality. Kang Youwei's understanding of "equality" is the equality without distinction, and the premise of the realization of equality is to eliminate the difference between the members of the society. Using the traditional equalitarianism to interpret equality is one of the misunderstandings of Kang's concept of equality.
【作者单位】： 南开大学周恩来政府管理学院;
【分类号】：D092;D081
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吕祖荫;《大同书》、亲民、厕所[J];前线;2003年09期
2 陈正夫;评康有为《大同书》的人道主义思想[J];江西社会科学;1984年01期
3 何金彝;傅立叶《新世界》与康有为《大同书》之比较[J];上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1996年01期
4 邓莉;康有为《大同书》思想实质论析[J];郴州师范高等专科学校学报;2000年05期
5 汪轩宇;;康有为《大同书》理论价值及其思想局限[J];传承;2013年06期
6 杨福田;倾箧底书 飨中外人——介绍江苏古籍出版社出版的一批古籍文献[J];w芸，
本文编号：2379474
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2379474.html
