COMMONWEALTH的“现代”意味
[Abstract]:Since modern times, religious reform and the secularization movement initiated by the Renaissance have made people begin to re-examine the nature of human beings and their status in the world. Hobbes drew on the methods of modern science. Combining the mode of philosophical thinking and combining and applying the two to his own political studies, the theory of commonwealth was constructed, which was the first logical correctness of modern thinkers, which had the significance of turning from tradition to modern times. The first person to discuss a complete form of political philosophy. Under the influence of Hobbes, Locke concretely rationalized the application of the concept of commonwealth, and made clear that the connotation of the concept is the connotation of government, thus becoming the symbol of modern government. This paper takes commonwealth as the main research object, this concept is clearly expressed in Hobbes' and Locke's political science works, it clearly defines the symbol of the transformation from traditional political philosophy to modern political philosophy. And it contains the ideological origin of modern political design and the reason of modern political and legal thought. Hobbes, though not the cocreator of the word, gave it a reasonable and profound political connotation. He was a pioneer of modern political philosophy. His logical reasoning and theoretical deduction in the thought of political philosophy influenced the basic thinking of Locke's political research, which made Locke regard commonwealth as the ultimate goal of the construction of his political system. However, the great differences in language between China and the United Kingdom have led to differences in the way of thinking and the perspective of investigation. So the concept of commonwealth is often translated according to the needs of the different viewpoints stated in domestic studies, which are translated into countries, governments, etc. Community, federation, etc. This is not conducive to the analysis of the transformation from traditional politics to modern politics, so this paper hopes that the meaning of the word commonwealth can be clearly expressed in the choice of the title, and that no clear Chinese translation of the word can be made in order to avoid further misunderstanding. This paper attempts to find out the expectations of the political civilization that Hobbes and Locke pour into the concept of commonwealth and to understand how this concept lays the theoretical foundation for the development of human politics towards civilization. And become the basic symbol of promoting the transformation of traditional political philosophy to modern political philosophy. Finally, compared with the current situation of the government function and responsibility in our country, the conclusion can be used for reference in the government construction in order to promote the reform of political system and the transformation of government function in our country. There are four parts as follows: the first part explains the significance of this topic, the domestic and foreign research status, the basic framework of the article. The second part explains that commonwealth should be understood as government, and that it is clear from both ends and means that individuals voluntarily relinquish their rights to form commonwealth. in order to finally achieve common wealth. The third part mainly discusses the influence of commonwealth on contemporary political philosophy and government theory, and makes it clear that we should subtract too much state intervention and government expansion according to the requirements of commonwealth, and apply this conclusion to the construction of modern government in our country. The fourth part is a summary of the article, carrying out the basic requirements of commonwealth in the construction of service-oriented government in China.
【学位授予单位】:中共中央党校
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D09
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邓;;后现代政治哲学的理论版图[J];当代社科视野;2008年Z1期
2 夏江旗;生死关怀在现代政治哲学中的展开——从马基雅维里、霍布斯到洛克[J];社会观察;2005年04期
3 陶林;彭立文;;人权哲学、世界主义与普遍主义——“西方政治哲学”全国学术研讨会综述[J];世界哲学;2011年06期
4 万俊人;从政治正义到社会和谐——以罗尔斯为中心的当代政治哲学反思[J];哲学动态;2005年06期
5 刘远征;民国初期的“共和”观念[J];法制与社会发展;2003年03期
6 高山奎;;政治哲学的起源与苏格拉底问题[J];哲学研究;2010年12期
7 佑军;;政治如何进入哲学[J];国际关系学院学报;2008年05期
8 王云萍;;公共行政伦理的现代政治哲学基础——以公共行政人员的基本角色界定为例[J];马克思主义与现实;2010年01期
9 陆锋明;道与卢梭的公意[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2005年05期
10 杨晓东;陈辉;;回归伦理世界的政治[J];中共天津市委党校学报;2008年05期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 Jean-Fran噻ois Chanet;;欧洲军事占领研究(英文)[A];北京论坛(2008)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——文明的普遍价值和发展趋向:“传统与现代的国家建构与政治文化”历史分论坛论文或摘要集(上)[C];2008年
2 何浩;;梁启超的“新民”与文学现代性的缘起和谱系[A];中国现代美学与文论的发动:“中国现代美学、文论与梁启超”全国学术研讨会论文选集[C];2008年
3 汪行福;;现代性与民主——批判理论的自由主义转向[A];当代国外马克思主义评论(第三辑)[C];2002年
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 李红英;法尔克的后现代政治哲学[N];学习时报;2010年
2 李强;“误读的杰作”?[N];南方周末;2004年
3 周濂;让哲学说中国话[N];中华读书报;2004年
4 吴茜;精彩诠释孙中山宪政思想[N];光明日报;2003年
5 连云区人民法院院长 史良成;构建培育司法核心价值观的意义[N];连云港日报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 柯联民;让·博丹政治、法律思想研究[D];上海师范大学;2011年
2 于云玲;难以维持的平衡[D];上海外国语大学;2011年
3 吴永华;现代自由的谱系:从卢梭、黑格尔到马克思[D];吉林大学;2011年
4 王华;在道德与政治之间[D];吉林大学;2012年
5 周南翼;追寻一个新的理想国:索尔·贝娄、伯纳德·马拉默德与辛西娅·奥芝克小说研究[D];厦门大学;2001年
6 王升平;自然正当、虚无主义与古典复归[D];复旦大学;2011年
7 田冠浩;超越“私人社会”的伦理困境[D];吉林大学;2012年
8 朱兵;一位斯特劳斯主义者的肖像:哈维·曼斯菲尔德政治思想初探[D];上海师范大学;2011年
9 王超;苏格兰启蒙政治思想研究[D];山东大学;2011年
10 陈华仔;“好人”与“好公民”的冲突与和解[D];湖南师范大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 徐小凡;COMMONWEALTH的“现代”意味[D];中共中央党校;2012年
2 李哲罕;现代政治哲学中的潜藏线索[D];浙江大学;2011年
3 张楠;论战后英澳关系(20世纪40年代至70年代)[D];华东师范大学;2010年
4 师明俊;霍布斯公民权利思想研究[D];重庆大学;2010年
5 杨双;《大伟人江奈生·魏尔德传》中道德规范的反讽建构[D];湘潭大学;2011年
6 安洋;奥斯卡·王尔德作品中所表现的政治思想[D];上海外国语大学;2012年
7 马俊峰;真正的政治:回答一种生活方式[D];陕西师范大学;2002年
8 刘军;霍布斯与卢梭自然状态学说的差异分析[D];西南政法大学;2010年
9 马啸;印度独立之初英印外交关系的重建[D];苏州科技学院;2009年
10 陈国忠;从世袭到流动:中国上古时期等级制度演变研究[D];华中师范大学;2001年
本文编号:2393919
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2393919.html