罗尔斯正义论之“原初状态”
[Abstract]:Since the publication of Rawls' Theory of Justice in the 1970s, political philosophy has become a hot topic in western philosophy. The focus of controversy about Rawls's the Theory of Justice is mainly focused on the logical basis point of the book "the original State". It is through this hypothetical state that Rawls himself restores political philosophy to contract theory. Rawls said: "in justice as fairness, the initial state of equality corresponds to the natural state in the traditional theory of social contract. This primordial state of course cannot be regarded as a practical historical state, nor is it the true primordial state of civilization that existed at the beginning of civilization. It should be understood as a state of pure hypotheses used to achieve a certain view of justice. "[1] therefore, the purpose of this paper is first to understand the idea of proof of the theory of justice by studying the" original state ". The second is to understand the turn of contemporary western political philosophy through the proof train of thought of "the theory of justice". In terms of methods, we begin by focusing on our understanding of "primordial state" from within. Secondly, through summarizing the controversy of liberalism and communitarianism on the concept of "primordial state", it deepens the understanding and grasp of "primordial state". The innovation of this paper is that the combination of internal and external perspectives highlights the main points and key points of Rawls'"original state" and its whole theory. The main achievements of the paper are reflected in the introduction and evaluation of Rawls'"original state" concept. On this basis, it realizes a more correct understanding and grasp of the concept of "original state" as the logical basis point of Rawls' whole theory. Finally, the understanding of the turn of contemporary western philosophy is realized.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D09
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨礼银;;罗尔斯“原初状态理念”的当代意义[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
2 陈吉顺;罗尔斯新自由主义述评[J];长春市委党校学报;2001年01期
3 霍达;;罗尔斯的差别原则辨析[J];财经问题研究;2008年02期
4 曹瑞涛;;“原初状态”中的诠释学循环——罗尔斯对契约论中循环论证的克服[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
5 马庆;;罗尔斯正义论:契约论与反思平衡[J];湖北社会科学;2007年05期
6 宇文宏,刘珂;从原初状态到正义原则——评析罗尔斯的契约论证明[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
7 伍志燕;;罗尔斯“原初状态”的康德式解读[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期
8 胡叔宝;;从自然状态到原初状态——罗尔斯对古典契约理论的修正[J];哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年02期
9 姚大志;罗尔斯的契约主义与政治哲学的证明[J];江苏社会科学;2004年05期
10 任剑涛;政治哲学的问题架构与思想资源[J];江海学刊;2003年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 杨礼银;论罗尔斯正义理论中的“原初状态理念”[D];山东师范大学;2003年
2 周木村;论罗尔斯正义理论的主要演变[D];南昌大学;2006年
3 林宏程;罗尔斯契约主义论证的逻辑[D];浙江大学;2008年
4 彭维;论罗尔斯“正义观”的哲学基础及其现代启示[D];中国石油大学;2008年
,本文编号:2427325
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2427325.html