全球正义理论的兴起及其对我国的启示
发布时间：2019-06-12 12:57
【摘要】：本文立足于马克思主义的立场、观点和原则对当代西方学术界的一个前沿、热点的理论观点进行批判性分析。由于篇幅和笔者能力所限,本文不可能穷尽全球正义的所有问题和环节,而是以凸显重点议题为原则。在掌握国内外相关研究资源的基础之上,本文就以下几个问题进行重点分析与探讨： 第一,厘清全球正义复兴的理论基础,并对全球正义兴起的现实原因进行简要剖析。这一内容在本文的第一章来完成。笔者首先从最基本的正义的概念、康德的世界公民理论、罗尔斯的《正义论》三方面阐述了全面正义复兴的理论基础。随后指出了全球化对整个世界的冲击及挑战,进而阐述了由全球化产生的全球不平等问题是全球正义兴起的现实条件。 第二,考虑到“全球正义”对于国内学界来说还不是一个非常熟悉的主题,因此本文在第二章对全球正义研究的主要视角进行了考察；对全球正义的基本内容进行分析和解释；对全球正义实现的可能性进行了简单论述。虽然完成这一部分的写作更多采用的是描述性或述评式的方法来进行的,但因国内学术界对全球正义的研究多以译介为主,深度研究不足,因而本文对全球正义所做的这种系统梳理是有一定意义的,能够为国内学术界对全球正义的拓展性研究提供基础。当然,这项工作对于本文论题的完成也是一个必要前提。 第三,本文在第三章对全球正义的利弊进行了简单的评价。在归纳整合的过程中挖掘了全球正义的三点主要贡献,即对人权的关注；追问“谁来承担全球正义的责任”,促进全球经济政治体制改革及提出了全球分配正义的思想。同时,也指出了全球正义存在的局限性,即全球正义具有较浓厚的乌托邦色彩；全球正义忽视了多元文化的事实；全球正义忽视了地方正义的重要性。此部分辩证的剖析全球正义有利于我们更好的研究和借鉴全球正义这一人类共同文明成果,去其糟粕、吸收其理论精华。 第四,为处于社会转型时期的中国提供值得借鉴的公平正义思想。此部分是本文研究的价值和意义所在。首先,笔者阐述了全球正义给予我们的启示,在此基础上,简单论述了我国对全球范围内正义问题的应对措施,如积极参与全球规则的制定、履行义务,承担国家责任及加强国际合作。本部分的着力点在于,我国对于国内正义问题的应对。笔者从坚持法律主治和制度优先原则；构建公平的全民共享的社会保障体系；完善我国公民的基本政治权利；规范权力行为,划清权力与市场的边界,严格限制权力市场化四方面展开了研究。
[Abstract]:Based on the position, viewpoint and principle of Marxism, this paper makes a critical analysis of a frontier and hot theoretical viewpoint in contemporary western academic circles. Due to the limitations of space and the author's ability, this paper can not exhaust all the problems and links of global justice, but to highlight the key issues as the principle. On the basis of mastering the relevant research resources at home and abroad, this paper focuses on the following issues: first, clarify the theoretical basis of the revival of global justice, and briefly analyze the practical reasons for the rise of global justice. This content is completed in the first chapter of this paper. First of all, the author expounds the theoretical basis of the revival of comprehensive justice from three aspects: the most basic concept of justice, Kant's theory of world citizens and Rawls' Theory of Justice. Then it points out the impact and challenge of globalization on the whole world, and then expounds that the global inequality caused by globalization is the realistic condition for the rise of global justice. Secondly, considering that "global justice" is not a very familiar theme for domestic academic circles, this paper examines the main perspective of global justice research in the second chapter; analyzes and explains the basic contents of global justice; and briefly discusses the possibility of realizing global justice. Although more descriptive or critical methods are used to complete this part of the writing, because most of the domestic academic research on global justice is mainly translation and introduction, the in-depth research is insufficient, so the systematic combing of global justice in this paper is of certain significance, which can provide a basis for the extended study of global justice in domestic academic circles. Of course, this work is also a necessary prerequisite for the completion of the topic of this paper. Third, in the third chapter, this paper makes a simple evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of global justice. In the process of induction and integration, this paper excavates three main contributions of global justice, that is, paying attention to human rights, asking "who will bear the responsibility of global justice", promoting the reform of global economic and political system and putting forward the idea of global distribution justice. At the same time, it also points out the limitations of global justice, that is, global justice has a strong utopian color; global justice ignores the fact of multiculturalism; global justice ignores the importance of local justice. This part of dialectical analysis of global justice is conducive to our better study and reference of global justice, which is the achievement of human common civilization, to remove its dross and absorb its theoretical essence. Fourth, it provides a fair and just thought for China in the period of social transformation. This part is the value and significance of this study. First of all, the author expounds the enlightenment of global justice to us, and on this basis, briefly discusses the countermeasures of our country to the global justice problem, such as actively participating in the formulation of global rules, fulfilling obligations, assuming state responsibility and strengthening international cooperation. The focus of this part is on the response of our country to the problem of domestic justice. The author studies from four aspects: adhering to the principle of legal rule and system priority, constructing a fair social security system shared by the whole people, perfecting the basic political rights of our citizens, standardizing the behavior of power, distinguishing the boundary between power and market, and strictly restricting the marketization of power.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D08;D61
本文编号：2498044
[Abstract]:Based on the position, viewpoint and principle of Marxism, this paper makes a critical analysis of a frontier and hot theoretical viewpoint in contemporary western academic circles. Due to the limitations of space and the author's ability, this paper can not exhaust all the problems and links of global justice, but to highlight the key issues as the principle. On the basis of mastering the relevant research resources at home and abroad, this paper focuses on the following issues: first, clarify the theoretical basis of the revival of global justice, and briefly analyze the practical reasons for the rise of global justice. This content is completed in the first chapter of this paper. First of all, the author expounds the theoretical basis of the revival of comprehensive justice from three aspects: the most basic concept of justice, Kant's theory of world citizens and Rawls' Theory of Justice. Then it points out the impact and challenge of globalization on the whole world, and then expounds that the global inequality caused by globalization is the realistic condition for the rise of global justice. Secondly, considering that "global justice" is not a very familiar theme for domestic academic circles, this paper examines the main perspective of global justice research in the second chapter; analyzes and explains the basic contents of global justice; and briefly discusses the possibility of realizing global justice. Although more descriptive or critical methods are used to complete this part of the writing, because most of the domestic academic research on global justice is mainly translation and introduction, the in-depth research is insufficient, so the systematic combing of global justice in this paper is of certain significance, which can provide a basis for the extended study of global justice in domestic academic circles. Of course, this work is also a necessary prerequisite for the completion of the topic of this paper. Third, in the third chapter, this paper makes a simple evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of global justice. In the process of induction and integration, this paper excavates three main contributions of global justice, that is, paying attention to human rights, asking "who will bear the responsibility of global justice", promoting the reform of global economic and political system and putting forward the idea of global distribution justice. At the same time, it also points out the limitations of global justice, that is, global justice has a strong utopian color; global justice ignores the fact of multiculturalism; global justice ignores the importance of local justice. This part of dialectical analysis of global justice is conducive to our better study and reference of global justice, which is the achievement of human common civilization, to remove its dross and absorb its theoretical essence. Fourth, it provides a fair and just thought for China in the period of social transformation. This part is the value and significance of this study. First of all, the author expounds the enlightenment of global justice to us, and on this basis, briefly discusses the countermeasures of our country to the global justice problem, such as actively participating in the formulation of global rules, fulfilling obligations, assuming state responsibility and strengthening international cooperation. The focus of this part is on the response of our country to the problem of domestic justice. The author studies from four aspects: adhering to the principle of legal rule and system priority, constructing a fair social security system shared by the whole people, perfecting the basic political rights of our citizens, standardizing the behavior of power, distinguishing the boundary between power and market, and strictly restricting the marketization of power.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D08;D61
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 丰晓丽;南诏大理国对唐宋王朝的政治认同及其现代意义[D];大理学院;2012年
，本文编号：2498044
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2498044.html
