苏辙《春秋集解》研究

发布时间：2018-02-15 08:38

本文关键词： 苏辙《春秋集解》《春秋》义例大义　出处：《山东师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：苏辙是北宋时期的文学家、经学家，也是“唐宋八大家”之一。在经学方面，他对北宋《春秋》学盛行“经传并荒”之风作了深刻的反思。苏辙治《春秋》，“集诸家之义而裁之”，主采《左传》，兼采《公》《谷》、啖、赵诸家，采取较为开放的态度；强调以史为据，重申《左传》的解经价值，肯定《春秋》是经而非史，对后世《春秋》学的发展产生了一定的影响。本文以苏辙的《春秋集解》为研究对象，在综合前人研究的基础上，从经学文献的角度进行更为深入的研究。本文内容共分为四个部分：第一章，苏辙生平及其著述简介。苏辙与其父兄并称“三苏”。他历经北宋仁宗、英宗、神宗、哲宗、徽宗五朝，宦海沉浮，一生命运坎坷；后退隐龙川十三年，潜心著述，著作颇丰，分为文学著作和经学著作两部分。第二章，《春秋集解》的成书背景。本章分三节探讨苏辙著此书的背景情况。第一节，北宋的经学变革。北宋时期，经学进入变古时代，汉唐建立的经学体系遭到了前所未有的质疑与挑战。第二节，北宋的《春秋》学概况。宋代统治者为政治需求，极力提倡士人治经，《春秋》学在此经学变革中较为凸显，也得到一定程度的发展。第三节，家学影响。苏洵、苏轼对苏辙《春秋集解》写作都有一定的影响。苏辙提到自己受业于父，也曾在诗文中多次提到自己“学于兄”，并称苏轼既是其兄，亦是其师友。第三章，《春秋集解》内容概述。本章共分为六节。第一节，对《春秋》性质的认定。苏辙认为《春秋》是孔子“遗言”，用以垂教后世的典范之作。第二节，对《春秋》功用的认识。苏辙认为《春秋》有垂教后世的功用，孔子作《春秋》就是为了张礼义，讥不正，，教化人们尊礼义，守王法。第三节，研究《春秋》的方法。苏辙在以事解《春秋》时，主采《左传》；以义例解《春秋》时，多取《公羊传》和《谷梁传》。苏辙治《春秋》虽重《左传》，自称当以事解《春秋》，但在《春秋集解》一书中单纯以事解《春秋》之处并不多，反而多以例解《春秋》。第四节，对《春秋》大义的具体阐释；第五节，对三传的批评；第六节，对《春秋》义例的新见解。第四章，苏辙《春秋集解》对后世的影响及后人评说。本章分两个方面论述：一是苏辙后代及其弟子对其《春秋》学的继承，苏辙晚年，以闭门著书，教导诸孙为乐。宋代以来的学者治《春秋》，多有转引苏辙《春秋集解》的内容。二是诸家对《春秋集解》的评价。叶梦得、陈弘绪等人对《春秋集解》多有批评，而张萱较为认可此书，《四库全书总目提要》也在一定程度上对此书给与了肯定。
[Abstract]:Su Zhe was a litterateur, economist, and one of the "eight great schools of the Tang and Song dynasties" in the Northern Song Dynasty. He made a profound reflection on the prevailing trend of "the classics passing on and the desolation" in the Northern Song Dynasty. Su rut governed the "Spring and Autumn period", "collected the meaning of all the families and cut it out", and adopted the "Zuo Zhuan" as well as the "Gong > < Gu], eating and Zhao's family, taking a more open attitude;" Emphasizing on the history as the basis, reiterating the value of Zuo Zhuan's interpretation of the classics, affirming that the Spring and Autumn period is the classics rather than the history, and exerting a certain influence on the development of the study of the Spring and Autumn period in later generations. This paper takes Su Ruo's "Spring and Autumn Collection solution" as the research object, on the basis of synthesizing the previous studies, carries on a more in-depth research from the angle of the Confucian classics literature. The content of this paper is divided into four parts altogether:. The first chapter is a brief introduction to Su Zhe's life and his writings. Su Zhe and his father and brother are also called "three Su". He has lived through the five dynasties of Northern Song Dynasty, Renzong, Yingzong, Shenzong, Zhe Zong, Huizong, and the ups and downs of the sea of officials, and the fate of his life has been bumpy. After 13 years of his retirement from Long Chuan, he wrote painstakingly. The works are abundant and are divided into two parts: literary works and classics works. Chapter two, the background of the book of the Spring and Autumn Chronicles. This chapter discusses the background of Su Zhe's book in three sections. The first section is the change of the Confucian classics in the Northern Song Dynasty. In the Northern Song Dynasty, the study of the classics entered the period of changing the ancient times. The Confucian classics system established in the Han and Tang dynasties was questioned and challenged unprecedented. Section two, the "Spring and Autumn period" of the Northern Song Dynasty. The rulers of the Song Dynasty urged the scholars to govern the classics for the sake of political needs, and the "Spring and Autumn period" learning became more prominent in the reform of the Confucian classics. The third section is the influence of family science. Su Xun and Su Shi have a certain influence on the writing of Su Zhe's Chun Qiu Ji. Su Zhe mentions that he was educated by his father. In his poems, Sushi has repeatedly mentioned that he "learned from his brother" and said that Su Shi is both his brother and his teacher. The first section is about the nature of the Spring and Autumn period. Su Zhe thinks that the Spring and Autumn period is Confucius'"last words", which is used to teach the model of later generations. The understanding of the function of "Spring and Autumn". Su Zhe believes that "Spring and Autumn" has the function of teaching later generations. Confucius wrote "Spring and Autumn" for the sake of Zhang Liyi, ridiculed, and educated people to respect the propriety and observe the law of the king. The method of studying "Spring and Autumn". When Su rut took the "Zuo Zhuan" in the interpretation of "Spring and Autumn", he took "Zuo Zhuan" as an example, and "Spring and Autumn" as an example. Su Ruozhi [Spring and Autumn], although he stressed "Zuo Zhuan" and claimed to be the cause of "Spring and Autumn", there are not many places in the book "Spring and Autumn" simply to explain "Spring and Autumn", but many examples of "Spring and Autumn > 4th," The concrete explanation of the meaning of the Spring and Autumn period; the criticism of the three legends in verse 5th; the new opinion on the example of the meaning of the Spring and Autumn period in verse 6th. In chapter 4th, the influence of Su Zhe's "Spring and Autumn Collection" on later generations and his comments on later generations are discussed. This chapter is divided into two aspects: one is the inheritance of the study of "Spring and Autumn" by Su Zhe's descendants and his disciples, and Su Zhe wrote books behind closed doors in his later years. Teaching Sun Wei-le. Since the Song Dynasty, scholars who have governed the Spring and Autumn period have often cited the contents of Su Rut's interpretation of the Spring and Autumn Collection. Second, they have commented on the "Spring and Autumn Collection solution." Ye Mengde, Chen Hongxu, and others have criticized the "Spring and Autumn Collection solution". Zhang Xuan is more approbated to this book, the outline of the book also to a certain extent to the book.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：K225.04

【参考文献】