中国“封建社会”再认识

发布时间：2018-03-02 10:10

本文关键词： 封建社会封建制度五种社会形态西欧中世纪马克思主义秦汉概念泛化封建主义中国社会史　出处：《史学月刊》2008年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中日译者以中国故有的"封建"概念,对译西语中表述西欧中世纪社会制度的feudalismus一词,后来在中国将秦汉以后至明清时期的历史称为"封建社会"。此说在中国近代社会及学术界形成主流认识。然而,中国秦汉以后至明清时期的历史是不是类似西欧中世纪的社会形态,中国的这段历史应该不应该有自己的特殊性表达,长期以来一直是学界有所关注的问题。冯天瑜教授《"封建"考论》一书的出版,再次将这个问题的讨论推向了高潮。两年来,关于封建译名以及如何认识马克思主义封建观的讨论,不断见诸报端,并形成了尖锐对立的不同意见。本刊认为,这场讨论,从"封建"译名引申到学术概念的界定,更进一步深入到中国封建社会的再认识,不仅关系到如何以科学的态度对待马克思主义理论的指导问题,更关系着我们对中国秦汉以后社会性质的判断,关系重大,意义深远。所以,本刊决定以笔谈的形式参与这场讨论,并欢迎学界同仁热情赐稿。
[Abstract]:The Chinese and Japanese translators use the concept of "feudalism", which is old in China, to translate the word feudalismus, which describes the medieval social system of Western Europe, in the Spanish language. Later in China, the history from the Qin and Han dynasties to the Ming and Qing dynasties was called "feudal society". This theory formed a mainstream understanding in modern Chinese society and academic circles. However, Is the history of China from the Qin and Han dynasties to the Ming and Qing dynasties similar to the social formation of the Middle Ages in Western Europe? the history of China should not have its own special expression. For a long time, it has been a matter of concern to academic circles. The publication of Professor Feng Tianyu's book "A study on feudalism" has once again pushed the discussion of this issue to a climax. In the past two years, The discussion on the translation of feudal names and how to understand Marxist feudal views has been published in the newspapers and has formed sharply opposed opinions. The Journal believes that this discussion has been extended from the translation of the "feudal" name to the definition of academic concepts. Further deeper understanding of the feudal society in China is not only related to how to treat the guidance of Marxist theory in a scientific manner, but also related to our judgment of the social nature after the Qin and Han dynasties in China, which is of great importance. Therefore, the journal decided to participate in the discussion in written form, and welcomed the enthusiastic contributions of academic colleagues.
【作者单位】：武汉大学历史学院
【分类号】：K207

【相似文献】