再谈敦煌写卷P.2001号:学术史与《大唐西域求法高僧传》的书名

发布时间：2018-05-07 21:51

  本文选题：法藏敦煌文献 + 伯希和　； 参考：《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：巴黎法国国家图书馆收藏的伯希和敦煌汉文写卷P.2001号,是唐义净《南海寄归内法传》的一份残钞。在伯希和汉文写卷目录中,它是第一号。伯希和把它编为第一号,是随意之举,还是出于一定的原因?本文根据伯希和当年在敦煌藏经洞"觅宝"时所做的日记和笔记,结合其学术经历和背景,对此进行讨论,认为伯希和此举并非偶然。这个问题看似无足轻重,此前也没有人提出过,但细究起来,却与当时英国、法国乃至欧洲的东方学学术研究和学术史密切相关。问题虽小,但以小而见大,对于我们今天了解敦煌研究最初的情况和敦煌学学术史不无意义,也有助于准确认识敦煌写卷的三个最主要的目录,即英国目录、法国目录和北京目录各自的特点以及相互间的差异。本文同时根据这份写卷中提到的义净另一部重要著作《大唐西域求法高僧传》的一个不一样的书名,分析《大唐西域求法高僧传》最早流传时的一些细节,原书的写作过程和结构,并对其中的变化及其与初唐时期政治文化变化的关系加以说明。
[Abstract]:The Paul Pelliot Dunhuang Chinese volume P.2001, collected by the French National Library in Paris, is a remnant of Tang Yijing's Legal Biography of the South China Sea. It was the number one in Paul Pelliot's Chinese volume directory. Did Paul Pelliot make it number one at random, or for some reason? On the basis of the diary and notes Paul Pelliot made in the Dunhuang Sutra Cave in search of Treasure, combined with his academic experience and background, this paper discusses this, and concludes that Paul Pelliot's action is not accidental. The question seems trivial and has not been raised before, but a closer look is tied to the academic research and history of Orientalism in Britain, France and Europe at the time. Although the problem is small, it is of great significance for us to understand the initial situation of Dunhuang research and the academic history of Dunhuang studies today, and also contribute to an accurate understanding of the three most important catalogs of Dunhuang volumes, that is, the British catalogue. The characteristics of French catalogue and Beijing catalogue and the differences between them. At the same time, according to the title of another important book Yijing mentioned in this volume, Biography of Senior monks in the Great Tang and Western regions, this paper analyzes some details of the earliest circulation of the Biography of Senior monks of the Great Tang and the Western regions of the Great Tang Dynasty. The writing process and structure of the original book as well as its changes and its relationship with the political and cultural changes in the early Tang Dynasty were explained.
【作者单位】： 北京大学东方文学研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“中国东方学学术史研究”(14ZDB084)
【分类号】：K207.8;K870.6
，

本文编号：1858573