“四库总目学”史研究

发布时间：2018-07-05 07:28

本文选题：四库总目学 + 史研究　；参考：《北京师范大学》2004年博士论文

【摘要】： “四库总目学”(简称“总目学”)是对《四库全书总目》(简称《总目》)进行研究的学问。“四库总目学史”(简称“总目学史”)是对“总目学”的发展历程、研究成果、研究方法、研究思想等进行的归纳总结和规律性探讨的学问。 “总目学史”研究对于总结两百多年来《总目》研究的基本成就,深入研讨“总目学”各类代表性成果,揭示其学术价值,归纳其研究方法,具有重要的理论价值和实践意义。本文在导言以下,从六个方面对“总目学史”进行考察和论述。第一章论述《总目》的编撰及其流传。从政治、经济、文化以及清朝对思想统一的要求分析《总目》的产生背景。其次考察《总目》编撰分工及编撰过程,讨论分纂提要、书前提要与《总目》提要之间的关系、内容差异及差异原因。最后总结《总目》的学术价值和意义。第二章研究各类对《总目》进行补撰的书目。首先指出《总目》编撰因文网与禁书毁书、馆臣学术眼光的不足及疏怠、清廷的民族政策等原因,造成《总目》缺漏甚多,引起各种补撰书目的产生。本章从禁书书目和未收书目两个方面考察了补撰书目的发展源流和基本成就。重点评述了姚觐元的《禁书总目四种》、孙殿起的《清代禁书知见录》、阮元的《四库未收书目提要》三种代表性书目的学术价值,指出补撰书目在揭示我国古籍发展状况,反映康乾社会政治面貌、文化政策及在书目编撰手法等方面的学术价值。第三章讨论续编《总目》的学术成就。《总目》之后,因各类学术著述不断涌现,因此产生《郑堂读书记》、《续修四库全书总目提要》为代表的一批续编书目。本章对以上两部代表性书目进行研究,指出《郑堂读书记》在内容、体例、考证方法等方面续接了《总目》,并有所发展;在增录图书方面作出了贡献。考察《续修提要》的编撰过程,指出其以续编为主,大大扩充了图书的著录范围,续写了乾隆朝及其以后中华文化发展史。第四章论述了对《总目》进行辨证补订的研究成果。指出《总目》因校勘不精、选本不良、馆臣粗疏及囿于门户之见等原因造成的种种错误。考察民国期间完成的余嘉锡《四库提要辨证》、胡玉缙《四库全书总目提要补正》两部代表性学术著作对《总目》纠谬补正的贡献及学术价值。比较二书的特点,指出余书以考证功力见长,胡书以补正总数取胜,二书各有侧重,有互补作用。此外,总结自民国到20世纪末,海峡两岸对《总目》纠谬补正的学术成果,分析其辨证方法及学术意义。第五章从文献学史和学术批评史的角度归纳“总目学”研究的成果,论述了以往“总目学”论著从文献学史的角度对《总目》在目录版本学、考据学上的价值进行总结,从学术批评的角度对《总目》的经学观、史学观、文学观等进行研究的成果,尤其突出评论了陈垣、周积明、黄爱平、季野等人的贡献。第六章总结有关学者对《总目》思想文化的研究,指出这种研究把目录学、思想史和文化史相结合的特色,强调其开辟“总目学”研究新领域与新思路的意义。本文结语从纵向概述了“总目学史”四个历史阶段的发展进程,归纳了“总目学”研究的流派及方法,并对“总目学”发展提出了前瞻性设想。
[Abstract]:The study of the "four libraries" ("total catalogue") is a study of the study of the total catalogue of the four library books. The history of the four libraries ("the history of the general catalogue") is a summary of the development process of the "general catalogue", the research results, the research methods and the research ideas.
The study of "history of the general catalogue" is of great theoretical and practical significance for the summary of the basic achievements of the "general catalogue" for more than two hundred years. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the representative achievements of the "general catalogue", to reveal its academic value and to sum up its research methods.
The first chapter discusses the compilation and spread of the general catalogue. From the political, economic, cultural, and the Qing Dynasty's requirements for the unification of thought, the background of the "general catalogue" is analyzed. Secondly, it examines the process of the compilation and compilation of the general catalogue, and discusses the relationship between the compilation of the summary, the relationship between the summary of the book and the general catalogue, the difference in content and the reasons for the difference. Finally, the summary of the general catalogue is summarized. Academic value and significance.
The second chapter studies the bibliography of all kinds of supplement to the general catalogue. First, it points out that the "general catalogue", the compilation of the network and the forbidden books, the lack of academic vision, the national policy of the courtiers, and so on, cause a lot of missing and missing books, which cause the creation of various supplement bibliographies. This chapter reviews and writes from the two aspects of the bibliography and the uncollected bibliography. The origin and basic achievements of the bibliography are discussed, and the academic value of Yao Jinyuan's four kinds of forbidden books, Sun Dianqi's "forbidden books in the Qing Dynasty", Ruan Yuan's "four libraries uncollected bibliographies", and the academic value of the three representative bibliographies are discussed. The academic value of the compilation techniques.
The third chapter discusses the academic achievement of the sequel to the general catalogue. After the general catalogue, there is a continuous emergence of various academic writings, resulting in a series of renewal bibliographies represented by "Zheng Tang reading Secretary" and "renewal of the summary of the total catalogue of four libraries." this chapter studies the above two representative bibliographies, and points out that "Zheng Tang reading Secretary >" in content, style, textual research methods and so on. Continue to follow the "general catalogue" and develop; make a contribution to the book of the added book. Study the compilation process of the renewal of the summary, and point out that it has extended the book's Cataloguing scope greatly, and has renewed the history of the Chinese culture in the Qianlong Dynasty and the future of the Chinese culture.
The fourth chapter expounds the research results of the dialectical supplement to the general catalogue. It points out that the mistakes caused by the unproofreading, the bad selection, the careless of the library and the limited view of the door are caused by the general catalogue, and the analysis of the syndrome differentiation of Yu Jia Xi's "four library summary" completed during the period of the Republic of China, and the two representative academic works of the general catalogue of the four library books of Hu Yujin. To compare the contribution and academic value of correction and correction, compare the characteristics of the two books, point out that Yu Shu has a long history of textual research, Hu Book wins the total number of complements, each of the two books has its own emphasis and complementarity. In addition, it summarizes the academic achievements of the two sides of the two sides of the Republic to the end of the twentieth Century, and analyzes the dialectical methods and academic significance on the two sides of the two sides of the Taiwan Straits.
The fifth chapter sums up the achievements of the study of the "general catalogue" from the perspective of the history of philology and the history of academic criticism, and discusses the summary of the value of the general catalogue of the previous "general catalogue" from the perspective of the history of philology, and the value of the study on the catalogue edition and the textual research, and the study view, the historical view, the literary view and so on from the angle of academic criticism. The achievements, especially the contribution of Chen Yuan, Zhou Ji Ming, Huang Aiping, Ji ye, et al.
The sixth chapter summarizes the scholars' research on the thought and culture of the general catalogue, and points out that this kind of research combines the characteristics of bibliography, ideological history and cultural history, and emphasizes the significance of opening up new fields and new ideas in the study of "general catalogue".
The conclusion of this paper is a longitudinal overview of the development process of the four historical stages of the "history of the general catalogue", and sums up the schools and methods of the study of the "general catalogue", and puts forward a forward-looking vision for the development of the "general catalogue".
【学位授予单位】：北京师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：K206

【引证文献】