《史记》断限与缺补疑案之梳理

发布时间：2018-07-08 15:32

本文选题：《史记》 + 断限　；参考：《西南民族大学学报(人文社科版)》2005年06期

【摘要】：《史记》的断限与缺补是《史记》研究史上重大疑案中最为突出的两个问题,两千多年来学者们多有争论。关于《史记》的上限有两说,下限有四说。从目前研究来看,上限基本定论,下限虽有多种说法,但“太初说”占主导地位。《史记》的缺补问题是与《史记》断限紧密相联的。由于断限本身的不明确,也造成了缺补问题的许多疑点。这一疑案有两大关键问题,一是《史记》的残缺,二是《史记》的补窜,本文对这些问题进行了梳理辨析。
[Abstract]:The limitation and lack of compensation of the Records of the historian are the two most prominent problems in the history of the study of the Historical Records, which have been debated by scholars for more than two thousand years. There are two theories on the upper limit and four on the lower limit. According to the present research, the upper limit is a basic conclusion, although the lower limit has a variety of theories, but "too early theory" is dominant. The problem of missing and filling in the Book of History is closely related to the limit of the Book of Records of History. Because of the uncertainty of the limit itself, it also causes many doubts about the problem of missing compensation. There are two key problems in this doubtful case, one is the defect of the Records of the History, the other is the supplement and channeling of the Records of the History.
【作者单位】：海南师范大学中文系
【分类号】：K204.2

【相似文献】