北美士族研究传统的演变——以姜士彬和伊沛霞研究的异同为线索
发布时间：2018-07-26 15:05
【摘要】：北美学人关于中国中古贵族制研究传统的演变,是美国中国学研究在中古问题上的投影。英文世界的士族研究是不容忽视的重要组成部分。姜士彬和伊沛霞是其中影响最大的两位学者。北美学人研究中古精英阶层的流派,大致以伯克利大学和哥伦比亚大学为代表,当然也有哈佛大学、斯坦福大学等高校的学者参与其中。北美学人研究士族的优劣利弊,如从人类学视角研究士族的身份认同,以及试图回应中古大族和近世宗族的异同等方面,为中国学人研究士族问题提供极为有益的借鉴。他们关于中古政治社会底色、士族政治地位的基本认识,以及关于士族研究的基本路径和理论等方面,大致分化成两个截然对立的学术阵营:主张贵族制者和主张社会流动者,两者相互交叉,相互影响。北美学者研究士族的学术渊源,主要来自日本学界的唐宋变革论和个案研究方法,本土人类学和社会学的士绅精英和宗族研究理论,同时受到华裔汉学家的直接影响,进而融会贯通,形成与中日学者有所区别、独具特色的学术传统。
[Abstract]:The evolution of the tradition of the study of Chinese aristocracy by the North American Scholars is the projection of American Chinese studies on the issue of the Middle Ages. The study of the literati in the English world is an important part that can not be ignored. Jiang Shibin and Yi Peixia are the two most influential scholars. The schools of the North American scholars studying the middle ancient elite are mainly represented by Berkeley University and Columbia University. Of course, there are also scholars from Harvard University, Stanford University and other universities. The advantages and disadvantages of the North American Scholars' study on the advantages and disadvantages of the gentry, such as the anthropological study of their identity, and their attempts to respond to the similarities and differences between the middle ancient and the modern clans, provide a very useful reference for the Chinese scholars to study the problems of the literati. Their basic understanding of the political and social background of the Middle Ancient period, the political status of the literati, and the basic path and theory of the study of the literati were roughly divided into two opposing academic camps: those who advocated aristocracy and those who advocated social mobility. The two intersect and influence each other. The academic origins of the scholars in North America are mainly derived from the theory of change and case study in the Tang and Song dynasties of Japanese scholars, the gentry elite and clan research theories of native anthropology and sociology, and are directly influenced by Chinese Sinologists. Furthermore, the academic tradition is different from that of Chinese and Japanese scholars.
，
本文编号：2146398
[Abstract]:The evolution of the tradition of the study of Chinese aristocracy by the North American Scholars is the projection of American Chinese studies on the issue of the Middle Ages. The study of the literati in the English world is an important part that can not be ignored. Jiang Shibin and Yi Peixia are the two most influential scholars. The schools of the North American scholars studying the middle ancient elite are mainly represented by Berkeley University and Columbia University. Of course, there are also scholars from Harvard University, Stanford University and other universities. The advantages and disadvantages of the North American Scholars' study on the advantages and disadvantages of the gentry, such as the anthropological study of their identity, and their attempts to respond to the similarities and differences between the middle ancient and the modern clans, provide a very useful reference for the Chinese scholars to study the problems of the literati. Their basic understanding of the political and social background of the Middle Ancient period, the political status of the literati, and the basic path and theory of the study of the literati were roughly divided into two opposing academic camps: those who advocated aristocracy and those who advocated social mobility. The two intersect and influence each other. The academic origins of the scholars in North America are mainly derived from the theory of change and case study in the Tang and Song dynasties of Japanese scholars, the gentry elite and clan research theories of native anthropology and sociology, and are directly influenced by Chinese Sinologists. Furthermore, the academic tradition is different from that of Chinese and Japanese scholars.
，
本文编号：2146398
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2146398.html
