论《开元礼》对郑玄和王肃礼学的择从

发布时间：2018-08-22 14:53

【摘要】：中国古代礼学中的两大主要流派———郑学和王学之争 ,是历代制礼作乐时都无法回避的焦点问题。若选取《开元礼》中庙数、郊祀、丧服、婚龄等几个侧面 ,分别按照郑义和王义加以检视 ,则可发现郑玄礼学在《开元礼》中并没有占据绝对的主导地位 ,相反王学却略占优势。这与唐初以郑学为主统一礼经的现实不符 ,与经学史之传统说法也稍有差距。唐人的礼制统一过程极其复杂 ,并非简单的南北选择或郑王选择 ;其原则是“稽周、汉之旧仪”、“考图史于前典”和“因时制范”三点。经过从唐初至唐中期 80年间的几次“考取王、郑” ,兼采南、北 ,《开元礼》已是一个南、北综汇 ,郑、王杂糅的产物 ,郑学自然不再居于主导地位 ,王学反而略占优势。
[Abstract]:The contention between Zheng and Wang, two major schools in ancient Chinese ritual study, is the focus problem that can not be evaded when making ritual music in the past dynasties. If the number of temples in Kaiyuan ceremony, suburban rites, mourning clothes, marriage age and other aspects are selected and examined according to Zheng Yi and Wang Yi respectively, it can be found that Zheng Xuanli did not occupy an absolute dominant position in Kaiyuan ceremony. On the contrary, Wang Xue has a slight advantage. This is not in accordance with the reality of the unification of ritual classics by Zheng Xue in the early Tang Dynasty and the traditional view of the history of Confucian classics. The process of the unification of the etiquette system of the Tang people is extremely complicated, not a simple North-South choice or Zheng Wang's choice, but its principles are "Jizhouzhou, the Han Dynasty's old instrument", "the examination of the history of drawing in the former canon" and "because of the time system" three points. After 80 times from the beginning of the Tang Dynasty to the middle of the Tang Dynasty, "taking the king, Zheng" and taking the southern, northern, and "Kaiyuan rites" has been the product of a mixture of the south and the north, Zheng and Wang. Naturally, Zheng no longer occupies a dominant position. On the contrary, Wang Xue has a slight advantage.
【作者单位】：武汉大学历史系
【分类号】：K207

【参考文献】