知识社会史视野下的朱熹《资治通鉴纲目》新探
发布时间：2018-10-09 19:52
【摘要】：朱子《资治通鉴纲目》历来被学界视为传统史学义理转向过程中的圭臬之作,影响深远。现有的研究往往注重对其体例与思想的阐发,而忽略了其典范地位的建构性质。换言之,印刷、阅读等文本的传播、接受过程,不是单纯的知识消费,也是一种再生产和建构的过程。南宋时,《纲目》刊布后,其定位尚处于游移状态。一方面,《纲目》被纳入"通鉴学"体系,以羽翼《通鉴》而存在。这种形象的塑造,并没有触动时人观念中《通鉴》因中兴编年而尊享仅次于《春秋》的地位。另一方面,《纲目》又被认为回归《春秋》劝惩之法,几与《春秋》争辉。此类认知建构,已隐然有《纲目》取代《通鉴》原有地位之势。这两种并存的认知,经历宋末元初正统论的讨论,被进一步选择,其中《纲目》归于"通鉴学"的认知逐渐被过滤。史学系谱内的秩序也得到一次较大的变动。《通鉴》被视为"鲁国旧史",《纲目》则贵为拟《春秋》的"史中经",此后仿从、阐释《纲目》,蔚然成风。
[Abstract]:Zhu Zi's "Zizhi Tong Jian Gang" has always been regarded by scholars as a model in the process of the turning of traditional historiography, which has far-reaching influence. The existing research often pays attention to the analysis of its style and thought, and neglects the constructive nature of its exemplary position. In other words, the transmission and acceptance of text, such as printing and reading, is not a mere consumption of knowledge, but also a process of reproduction and construction. In the Southern Song Dynasty, after the publication, its position was still in a wandering state. On the one hand, Compendium was brought into the system of "Tongjian" and existed as wing "Tongjian". The creation of this image did not touch the concept of "Tongjian" because of ZTE Chronicle and enjoy the second only position of "Spring and Autumn". On the other hand, Compendium is also considered to return to the "Spring and Autumn" advice and punishment, several with the "Spring and Autumn". This kind of cognitive construction already has the tendency of replacing the original position of "General Jian". After the discussion of orthodoxy in the late Song Dynasty and the early Yuan Dynasty, these two kinds of cognition were further selected. The order in the historiographic pedigree was also changed greatly. "General Jian" was regarded as "the Old History of the State of Lu", and the "Chronicles" was highly regarded as the "Book of History" of the "Spring and Autumn period". After that, it became a trend to imitate and interpret the "Compendium".
【作者单位】： 南开大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K204.3
，
本文编号：2260572
[Abstract]:Zhu Zi's "Zizhi Tong Jian Gang" has always been regarded by scholars as a model in the process of the turning of traditional historiography, which has far-reaching influence. The existing research often pays attention to the analysis of its style and thought, and neglects the constructive nature of its exemplary position. In other words, the transmission and acceptance of text, such as printing and reading, is not a mere consumption of knowledge, but also a process of reproduction and construction. In the Southern Song Dynasty, after the publication, its position was still in a wandering state. On the one hand, Compendium was brought into the system of "Tongjian" and existed as wing "Tongjian". The creation of this image did not touch the concept of "Tongjian" because of ZTE Chronicle and enjoy the second only position of "Spring and Autumn". On the other hand, Compendium is also considered to return to the "Spring and Autumn" advice and punishment, several with the "Spring and Autumn". This kind of cognitive construction already has the tendency of replacing the original position of "General Jian". After the discussion of orthodoxy in the late Song Dynasty and the early Yuan Dynasty, these two kinds of cognition were further selected. The order in the historiographic pedigree was also changed greatly. "General Jian" was regarded as "the Old History of the State of Lu", and the "Chronicles" was highly regarded as the "Book of History" of the "Spring and Autumn period". After that, it became a trend to imitate and interpret the "Compendium".
【作者单位】： 南开大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K204.3
，
本文编号：2260572
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2260572.html
