论两宋时期禁谶与应谶的矛盾性
发布时间:2019-04-19 17:08
【摘要】:谶纬杂说兴盛于两汉时期,经过南北朝与隋唐时期多次禁毁,却收效甚微,直至两宋时期仍非常盛行。两宋时期的禁谶诏令与朝臣禁谶奏章,史不绝书,从而与两宋君主的信谶行为与国家事务中的应谶举措形成鲜明对比。分析两宋时期禁谶与应谶的矛盾现象,揭示这种矛盾性的实质与影响,显然可以从一个非常关键的角度具体阐释中国古代谶纬之说的兴盛与屡禁不止的一大原因,进而有助于引发对中国古代舆论控制的进一步思考。
[Abstract]:The divination theory flourished in the Han Dynasty, after many times banned destruction in the Southern and Northern dynasties and Sui and Tang dynasties, but achieved little effect, until the Song Dynasty is still very popular. The prophecy decrees of the two Song dynasties and the prophecy of the courtiers are in constant history, which is in sharp contrast with the prophecy behavior of the monarchs in the Song Dynasty and the corresponding prophecy measures in the affairs of the state. By analyzing the contradiction between prophecy and prophecy in the Song Dynasty and revealing the essence and influence of this contradiction, it is obvious that one of the major reasons for the prosperity and repeated prohibition of the theory of prophecy in ancient China can be explained in detail from a very crucial point of view. Therefore, it is helpful to arouse further thinking on the control of public opinion in ancient China.
【作者单位】: 浙江师范大学人文学院;浙江师范大学人文学院一级学科博士后流动站;
【基金】:浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地江南文化研究中心研究成果
【分类号】:K244
[Abstract]:The divination theory flourished in the Han Dynasty, after many times banned destruction in the Southern and Northern dynasties and Sui and Tang dynasties, but achieved little effect, until the Song Dynasty is still very popular. The prophecy decrees of the two Song dynasties and the prophecy of the courtiers are in constant history, which is in sharp contrast with the prophecy behavior of the monarchs in the Song Dynasty and the corresponding prophecy measures in the affairs of the state. By analyzing the contradiction between prophecy and prophecy in the Song Dynasty and revealing the essence and influence of this contradiction, it is obvious that one of the major reasons for the prosperity and repeated prohibition of the theory of prophecy in ancient China can be explained in detail from a very crucial point of view. Therefore, it is helpful to arouse further thinking on the control of public opinion in ancient China.
【作者单位】: 浙江师范大学人文学院;浙江师范大学人文学院一级学科博士后流动站;
【基金】:浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地江南文化研究中心研究成果
【分类号】:K244
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑琪;浅议两宋时期中越之间的战事[J];河南社会科学;2005年03期
2 吴鸿丽;;两宋时期泉州地区造桥热潮的原因探析[J];泉州师范学院学报;2006年01期
3 崔明德;;对两宋时期和亲理念的初步考察[J];烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年03期
4 王祥春;赵双全;;两宋时期的中越贸易[J];东南亚纵横;2007年04期
5 郭友亮;;两宋时期林业政策述论[J];农业考古;2009年04期
6 刘雅萍;;乡土情结与神灵的扩张——关于两宋时期区域神灵的思考[J];河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年05期
7 李华;;试析两宋时期盟约的制定与履行[J];西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年05期
8 申利丽;申健强;;两宋时期的书画装裱[J];兰台世界;2011年28期
9 张俊飞;;两宋时期的人地矛盾及解决方式探讨[J];江苏教育学院学报(社会科学);2012年03期
10 杜品;;两宋时期四川私学的发展[J];兰台世界;2013年09期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 郭黛Y,
本文编号:2461127
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2461127.html