近代中日史学者对中国古代疆域的考辨——以白鸟库吉与顾颉刚为中心
发布时间：2019-04-19 23:16
【摘要】：作为"东洋学派"与"古史辨派"的创始人,白鸟库吉与顾颉刚都对中国古代疆域范围、形状,上古时代汉民族与周边民族之间的关系,中国传统华夷体系的形成等问题做了论述。白鸟库吉仅关注《禹贡》中出现的汉民族疆域范围,描绘出汉民族古代国家在亚欧大陆上的地位,这是对古代中国疆域形态的横向描绘。顾颉刚系统梳理出中国古代疆域变迁的过程,是对古代中国地理疆域的纵向考证。关于中国古代疆域的形状,白鸟库吉认为"南北长、东西短",顾颉认为"窄于南北而宽于东西"。白鸟库吉和顾颉刚都反对西方学界的"汉民族西来说",主张黄河流域是孕育中国古代文明的摇篮。白鸟库吉主张严峻区分汉民族和周边少数民族,顾颉刚重视民族融合在中华民族早期形成中的作用,主张华夷一体。
[Abstract]:As the founders of "Oriental School" and "Ancient History Dialectics", White Bird Kuji and Gu Jiegang both had an understanding of the scope and shape of ancient Chinese territory and the relationship between the Han nationality and the surrounding nationalities in the ancient times. The formation of Chinese traditional Huayi system is discussed. White Bird Kuji only pays attention to the boundaries of Han nationality in Yugong, and describes the status of ancient Han nation on Eurasia, which is a horizontal description of ancient Chinese territory. Gu Jiegang systematically combed out the process of the evolution of ancient Chinese territory, which is a longitudinal textual study of ancient Chinese geographical territory. Regarding the shape of ancient Chinese territory, the white bird Kuji believed that "the north-south is long and the east is short" and Gu Jie believes that "it is narrower than the north-south and wider than the east-west". Both Bai-bird Kuji and Gu Jie-gang oppose the western speaking of Han nationality and hold that the Yellow River basin is the cradle of Chinese ancient civilization. White Bird Kuji advocated a severe distinction between Han nationality and surrounding minorities, Gu Jiegang attached importance to the role of national integration in the early formation of the Chinese nation, and advocated the integration of Huayi and Yi.
【作者单位】： 北京语言大学东方语言文化学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(15YJC770047)
【分类号】：K22
本文编号：2461382
[Abstract]:As the founders of "Oriental School" and "Ancient History Dialectics", White Bird Kuji and Gu Jiegang both had an understanding of the scope and shape of ancient Chinese territory and the relationship between the Han nationality and the surrounding nationalities in the ancient times. The formation of Chinese traditional Huayi system is discussed. White Bird Kuji only pays attention to the boundaries of Han nationality in Yugong, and describes the status of ancient Han nation on Eurasia, which is a horizontal description of ancient Chinese territory. Gu Jiegang systematically combed out the process of the evolution of ancient Chinese territory, which is a longitudinal textual study of ancient Chinese geographical territory. Regarding the shape of ancient Chinese territory, the white bird Kuji believed that "the north-south is long and the east is short" and Gu Jie believes that "it is narrower than the north-south and wider than the east-west". Both Bai-bird Kuji and Gu Jie-gang oppose the western speaking of Han nationality and hold that the Yellow River basin is the cradle of Chinese ancient civilization. White Bird Kuji advocated a severe distinction between Han nationality and surrounding minorities, Gu Jiegang attached importance to the role of national integration in the early formation of the Chinese nation, and advocated the integration of Huayi and Yi.
【作者单位】： 北京语言大学东方语言文化学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(15YJC770047)
【分类号】：K22
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 赵薇;;“满鲜历史地理调查部”与白鸟库吉东洋史学研究[J];历史教学(下半月刊);2011年03期
2 杨镰;;内陆亚洲的变局与均衡[J];读书;2007年03期
3 王夏刚;曹德良;;抗战时期金毓黼东北史研究述论[J];大连近代史研究;2009年00期
4 李婷;;19世纪末20世纪初传入东方的实证主义史学[J];商业文化(学术版);2008年04期
5 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 章陆频;白鸟库吉中国古史观的形成及其影响[D];华东师范大学;2016年
2 倪平英;相似外表下的不同内核[D];华东师范大学;2006年
，本文编号：2461382
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2461382.html
