文化史研究的省思
发布时间：2019-06-15 20:39
【摘要】：20世纪80年代以来,中国近代文化史研究虽取得长足进展,但对其理论问题尚乏充分讨论。这一状况,非常不利于研究的持久深入。为了推进中国近代文化史研究的理论思考,我们邀请六位教授,就相关问题发表各自的高见。郑师渠认为:要正确解读20世纪初年中国社会文化思潮的变动,必须进一步超越既有的定势思维,将之置于欧战前后现代思潮变动的大视野下考察,引入反省现代性思潮这一新的视角,把握现代性与反省现代性的搏击与统一,才能得出更合乎历史实际的认识。史革新认为:在近代中国新文化理论诸说中,近代文明观是形成较早的文化理论学说,它固然有对传统文化观念的继承,但更主要的是对输入于欧美、日本的文明观的吸收,实为中国近代思想文化的发展提供了一个新的起点。郑大华认为:加强社会变迁与文化转型之互动关系的研究,对于深化中国近代文化史的研究具有十分重要的意义,因为社会变迁引起文化转型,并决定着文化转型的性质和速率,而文化转型又对社会变迁有着重要影响,有时还为下一步的社会变迁制造或提供思想前提。黄兴涛认为:文化史研究由三个层面组成,一是文化人物、事件、各文化分支门类自身一般状况的研究;二是多种文化因素整合而成的"文化现象"的发现和阐释;三是文化与社会政治、经济等的互动关系的研究,尤其应注重"社会的文化史"与"文化的社会史"之间的互动关系。李帆认为:中国近代学术史研究有其自身的特色所在,分期方面不完全等同于政治史,研究对象、视角和思想史有所不同,不过没必要强分畛域,研究视野上则要有文化史的视野,文化史是其基本依托。张昭军认为:中国近代文化史研究对象的确定,一是要以新文化的生成、发展为主线,兼顾近代历史上的其他文化;二是要将文化史作为类文化的历史,而非专史的简单拼合;三是既把文化作为研究对象,又视为不断发展的理论方法;四是要处理好"外在取向"与"内在理路"的关系。以下刊出他们的精彩论述,希望能对关注这方面问题的读者有所帮助,也期望学界同仁参与讨论。
[Abstract]:Since 1980's, great progress has been made in the study of modern Chinese cultural history, but its theoretical problems have not been fully discussed. This situation is very detrimental to the lasting and in-depth study. In order to promote the theoretical thinking of the study of modern Chinese cultural history, we invited six professors to express their views on related issues. Zheng Shiqu believes that in order to correctly interpret the changes of Chinese social and cultural trend of thought in the early 20th century, we must further transcend the existing fixed thinking, put it in the perspective of the changes of modern thoughts before and after the European War, introduce the new perspective of introspect on the trend of thought of modernization, and grasp the struggle and unity of modernization and introspect in order to obtain a more realistic understanding of history. According to historical innovation, in the theory of modern Chinese new culture, the view of modern civilization is an early theory of cultural theory. Although it inherits the concept of traditional culture, it is more important to absorb the concept of civilization imported into Europe, the United States and Japan, which provides a new starting point for the development of modern Chinese ideology and culture. Zheng Dahua believes that strengthening the study of the interactive relationship between social change and cultural transformation is of great significance for deepening the study of modern Chinese cultural history, because social change leads to cultural transformation and determines the nature and rate of cultural transformation, and cultural transformation has an important impact on social change, sometimes creating or providing ideological premise for the next step of social change. Huang Xingtao believes that the study of cultural history consists of three levels, one is the study of cultural figures, events and the general situation of each cultural branch itself; the other is the discovery and interpretation of "cultural phenomena" formed by the integration of various cultural factors; the third is the study of the interactive relationship between culture, social politics, economy and so on, especially the interactive relationship between "social cultural history" and "cultural social history". Li Fan believes that the study of modern Chinese academic history has its own characteristics, and the stage is not exactly the same as political history, the object of study, the perspective of view and the history of thought are different, but there is no need to divide the scope strongly, but the research field of vision should have the vision of cultural history, and cultural history is its basic support. Zhang Zhaojun believes that the determination of the research object of modern Chinese cultural history is to take the formation and development of new culture as the main line, taking into account other cultures in modern history; second, to regard cultural history as the history of quasi-culture, rather than as a simple combination of special history; third, to regard culture as both the object of study and the theoretical method of continuous development; and fourth, to deal with the relationship between "external orientation" and "internal rational road". The following wonderful discussions are published in the hope of helping readers concerned with this issue, and colleagues in the academic community are also expected to participate in the discussion.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学清史研究所
【分类号】：K203
[Abstract]:Since 1980's, great progress has been made in the study of modern Chinese cultural history, but its theoretical problems have not been fully discussed. This situation is very detrimental to the lasting and in-depth study. In order to promote the theoretical thinking of the study of modern Chinese cultural history, we invited six professors to express their views on related issues. Zheng Shiqu believes that in order to correctly interpret the changes of Chinese social and cultural trend of thought in the early 20th century, we must further transcend the existing fixed thinking, put it in the perspective of the changes of modern thoughts before and after the European War, introduce the new perspective of introspect on the trend of thought of modernization, and grasp the struggle and unity of modernization and introspect in order to obtain a more realistic understanding of history. According to historical innovation, in the theory of modern Chinese new culture, the view of modern civilization is an early theory of cultural theory. Although it inherits the concept of traditional culture, it is more important to absorb the concept of civilization imported into Europe, the United States and Japan, which provides a new starting point for the development of modern Chinese ideology and culture. Zheng Dahua believes that strengthening the study of the interactive relationship between social change and cultural transformation is of great significance for deepening the study of modern Chinese cultural history, because social change leads to cultural transformation and determines the nature and rate of cultural transformation, and cultural transformation has an important impact on social change, sometimes creating or providing ideological premise for the next step of social change. Huang Xingtao believes that the study of cultural history consists of three levels, one is the study of cultural figures, events and the general situation of each cultural branch itself; the other is the discovery and interpretation of "cultural phenomena" formed by the integration of various cultural factors; the third is the study of the interactive relationship between culture, social politics, economy and so on, especially the interactive relationship between "social cultural history" and "cultural social history". Li Fan believes that the study of modern Chinese academic history has its own characteristics, and the stage is not exactly the same as political history, the object of study, the perspective of view and the history of thought are different, but there is no need to divide the scope strongly, but the research field of vision should have the vision of cultural history, and cultural history is its basic support. Zhang Zhaojun believes that the determination of the research object of modern Chinese cultural history is to take the formation and development of new culture as the main line, taking into account other cultures in modern history; second, to regard cultural history as the history of quasi-culture, rather than as a simple combination of special history; third, to regard culture as both the object of study and the theoretical method of continuous development; and fourth, to deal with the relationship between "external orientation" and "internal rational road". The following wonderful discussions are published in the hope of helping readers concerned with this issue, and colleagues in the academic community are also expected to participate in the discussion.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学清史研究所
【分类号】：K203
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 粟冠昌;;宋代的广西社会经济[J];广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1981年04期
2 米华;;人以群分——学生工作中的社会心理问题初探[J];学校党建与思想教育;1985年04期
3 童致和;;“岁名”溯源——语言与文化密切相关之一例[J];杭州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1987年01期
4 克里格;陈海宏;;近代心智史的各个学派和研究方法[J];国外社会科学文摘;1988年07期
5 严志君;;郝懿行《尔雅义疏·释诂》的术语体系[J];西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);1988年S1期
6 龙尚学;;清代贵州官署楹联丛谈[J];贵州文史丛刊;1989年02期
7 林耀德;;台湾新世代小说家[J];文学自由谈;1989年06期
8 华泉;牛河梁的“庙、坛、、冢”——红山文化文明起源的象征[J];w，
本文编号：2500497
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2500497.html
