科学理性主义与超自然经验叙事

发布时间：2018-03-08 15:36

  本文选题：超自然信仰　切入点：超自然经验叙事　出处：《文化遗产》2015年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：学术理性主义传统认为超自然信仰起因于各种各样的谬误,是缺乏批判力的思维对奇异的自然现象所作的非科学解释,因而必将随着教育和科技的日趋进步而衰亡消逝。本文主要论述围绕着现代理性主义和民间信仰而进行的学术讨论中所产生的观点,认为是文化进化论等社会科学中的唯物主义思想强制性地把现代思维和超自然信仰对立起来,事实上超自然信仰在当代社会中广泛存在。应用现象学方法对当代的超自然信仰和经验叙事进行分析,发现可以归纳并描述出其中属于逻辑的成分,在此基础上进一步考察逻辑推理在这类信仰和叙事建构过程中的作用。此外,这类叙事还十分重视对于证据的收集和嵌入,并采用重复等叙事策略来突显其合乎逻辑性。所以,超自然信仰和经验叙事虽看似与现代思维格格不入,其建构却是因着现代思维而存在的。
[Abstract]:The tradition of academic rationalism holds that the supernatural belief originates from all kinds of fallacies and is an unscientific explanation of strange natural phenomena by a lack of critical thinking. Therefore, it is bound to decline and die with the progress of education and science and technology. This paper mainly discusses the viewpoints of academic discussion around modern rationalism and folk belief. It is the materialism in the social sciences, such as cultural evolution, that opposites modern thinking with supernatural beliefs. In fact, the supernatural belief exists widely in the contemporary society. By analyzing the contemporary supernatural belief and empirical narration by using phenomenological methods, it is found that it can be summarized and described as a logical component. On the basis of this, we further investigate the role of logical reasoning in the process of constructing such beliefs and narratives. In addition, this kind of narrative also attaches great importance to the collection and embedding of evidence, and adopts narrative strategies such as repetition to highlight its logic. Although supernatural beliefs and empirical narratives seem to be incompatible with modern thinking, their construction is based on modern thinking.
【作者单位】： 美国印第安纳大学民俗学与音乐人类学系;中山大学中文系;
【分类号】：B933
，

本文编号：1584491