浅谈萨迦派和格鲁派对现量和已决智的不同论述

发布时间：2018-03-22 19:21

本文选题：量学　切入点：现量　出处：《青海民族大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：因明学在一千多年前传入藏区,经过无数藏族学者的研习吸收、消化改造、提高发展,现在已经成为藏学中最重要的组成部分之一纵观藏传佛教因明学的发展历史,自11世纪桑普寺建立起,尤其是从恰巴论师创立了藏传因明学独特的学习方法——辩经,在藏地开始出现了大量的因明学著作。由于恰巴论师对因明学的重视,以及他在桑普寺的威信,很快在藏地兴起了“恰巴派”这一派别,也就是在后期被萨迦班智达等称为的“早期因明学派”。在整个藏传因明学的发展过程中影响很大。直到13世纪,萨迦班智达著了藏传因明史上最著名的著作《量理宝藏论》,萨迦班智达根据法称的《释量论》等因明学重要典籍对恰巴论师等早期的藏地因明派系的观点进行了进一步的提升。因此,这本著作对藏传因明学的发展起到了很重要的作用。特别是萨迦班智达传承和发扬了法称的《释量论》,在融通陈那和法称的因明思想的基础上,总结因明七论主要内容撰写了《量理宝藏论》,从而形成了萨迦派自己的因明体系。之后到15世纪,宗喀巴大师建立了甘丹寺,从此格鲁派迅速崛起,宗喀巴师徒非常重视对因明学的学习,通过对陈那和法称的因明学典籍详细的学习,同时又借鉴了萨迦派的《量理宝藏论》,从而发展了格鲁派自己独到的因明学思想理论体系。以上这三个时期可以被认为是藏传因明史上大三非常重要的时期。因此,在这篇论文当中本人将对萨迦派和格鲁派在关于量学当中现识和已决智的解释和论述进行比较,意在通过比较的方法,进一步分析其各自对现量和已决智的不同观点和论述方式,从而分析出其共同点,并且适当的对不同的观点划清界限。本论文总共分为三章,第一章里简要地介绍了萨迦派和格鲁派的因明学的起源和特点,以及萨迦因明形成之前的藏传因明的讲学情况做为铺垫。第二章里主要比较和分析了萨迦派和格鲁派在关于量的不同解释和论述方式。第三章主要对萨迦派和格鲁派在关于现量和已决智是否有共性进行比较分析,总结性地列出其不同的特点及部分理论观点上的特点。
[Abstract]:In-Ming was introduced into Tibetan areas more than 1,000 years ago, absorbed by numerous Tibetan scholars, digested and reformed, and improved. Now it has become one of the most important components of Tibetan studies and has become one of the most important parts of Tibetan Buddhism. Since the establishment of the Sanpu Temple in the 11th century, especially from the Chiapa theorists, who founded the unique learning method of Tibetan Invincialism-the Dian Jing, there began to appear a large number of works on Inmics in Tibet, which was due to the importance attached by Chaba theorists to the study of imminence. And his prestige in the Temple of Samp, which soon rose in the Tibetan area, "the Chaba faction," That is, the "early InMing School", which was called the "early InMing School" by Sakya Banzhida and so on in the later period. It had a great influence on the development of the whole Tibetan Invincialism until the 13th century. Sakah Banzhida has written the most famous book in the history of Tibetan history, "the Theory of quantitative Treasures". Sakah Banzhida, according to what he called "the Theory of interpretation and quantity", has carried out the views of the early Yiming faction of Tibet, such as the Chiba theorists, and so on. Further ascension. Therefore, This work has played a very important role in the development of Tibetan imminence. In particular, Sakya Banzhida inherited and carried forward what he called the "interpretation of quantity", which was based on the integration of Chen Na's and Dharma's InMing thoughts. Summing up the main contents of the seventh theory of Yiming, he wrote "the Theory of quantitative Treasures", thus forming the InMing system of the Sakya School. Later, in the 15th century, Master Zongkaba established the Gandan Temple, and since then the Gruff faction rose rapidly. Zongkaba teachers and disciples attach great importance to the study of InMing, through the detailed study of Chen Na's and the Dharma's classic books of InMing study. At the same time, it draws lessons from Sakya's Theory of Treasures of Metrology, thus developing the unique theoretical system of Ingenialism of the Gru School. These three periods can be considered as the most important period in the history of Tibetan immortality. Therefore, the three periods can be regarded as the most important period in the history of Tibetan immortality. In this paper, I will compare the explanations and expositions of the Sakya School and the Gru School on the present and determined wisdom in quantitative science, with a view to comparing them with the method of comparison. This thesis is divided into three chapters: further analysis of their different viewpoints and approaches to present quantity and determined wisdom, and analysis of their common points, and proper demarcation of different viewpoints. The first chapter briefly introduces the origin and characteristics of the InMing School of Sakya and Gruglism. The second chapter mainly compares and analyzes the different interpretation and argumentation of the quantity between the Sakya and the Gruki. Chapter three mainly focuses on the Sakya and GE. Lu's comparative analysis on whether there are commonalities between the present quantity and the determined wisdom, A summary of its different characteristics and some of the theoretical point of view of the characteristics.
【学位授予单位】：青海民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B948

【相似文献】