刘向、刘歆父子的五行灾异说和新德运观

发布时间：2018-04-18 18:54

本文选题：刘向 + 刘歆　；参考：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2013年06期

【摘要】：刘向所传《洪范五行传》虽然与夏侯始昌所传之文字相同,但他可能按照五行相生之序对传文次序作了调整;刘歆更进一步,对传文作了多方面的改变:一者,他对《五行传》作了结构性的划分,并分别称名之;二者,他有意改作传文,有许多地方确实与乃父所传不同;三者,其《洪范五行传论》前有一个类似《序》的导言,用以说明《洪范》"九畴"及《五行传》所由作的理论原由,并对传统的《河图》、《洛书》提出了具体的解释。在解说上,刘向、刘歆的《洪范五行传论》差异很大,不过二人援《易》以作解释则是共同的。而刘向刘歆父子为何采用五行相生顺序的新德运观,原因有多个方面,从总体上来看,乃是西汉经学、哲学、史学和文化多重因素综合作用的一种结果;此种德运观虽然一方面承认了秦得水德的既往看法,但是另一方并不承认其在德运历史中的合法性。
[Abstract]:Although Liu Xiang's biography of the five elements of Hong Fan is the same as that of Hou Shi-chang, he may have adjusted the order of transmission according to the sequence of the five elements; Liu Xin went further and made many changes in the transmission: one,He made a structural division of the Biography of the five elements and named it by name; he intended to change the text, and there were many places which were really different from those of the Father; and there was a similar introduction to the introduction of the preface before his book "Hong Fan's Biography of the five Lines".It is used to explain the theoretical reasons of "Nine domains" and "five elements Biography" in "Hong Fan" and "five elements Biography", and to give a concrete explanation to the traditional "River Chart" and "Luo Shu".In explanation, Liu Xiang and Liu Xin's "Hong Fan's five elements Biography" are very different, but the two people's aid to explain is the same.The reason why Liu Xiang Liu Xin's father and son adopt the concept of "New German Movement" in the order of "five elements living together" has many aspects. On the whole, it is the result of the comprehensive action of many factors such as Confucian classics, philosophy, historiography and culture in the Western Han Dynasty.On the one hand, this view of German movement acknowledges the former view of Qin de Shui de, but on the other hand, it does not recognize its legitimacy in the history of German shipping.
【作者单位】：武汉大学哲学学院;武汉大学国学院;
【分类号】：B992.1;K234

【参考文献】