浅谈释量论之礼赞
发布时间：2018-08-27 08:21
【摘要】：礼赞是趣入经典三门之一,通过三门或三门之一撰写文化,不但是古印度和藏族先辈作家们与众不同的传统写作格式,并且是识别作者和其著作归属内外何道的重要标志。释量论的礼赞作为一种特殊而富有深意的礼赞,具有其他经典没有的三门集一体之特点。笔者拟将礼赞概述和《释量论》礼赞详解两部分来完论述。目前我所见到的关于礼赞方面的文章只少之又少,而且这些文章不完善和不具深度的弊端。所以本文将分礼赞分为最初形成原因,礼赞名之寓意,礼赞的对象,礼赞的分类及必要性等五部分进行详细论述。释量论的礼赞在《释量论》释疏中只有少许论述外,没有进行专题研究。而释文的作者也只以自己的理解字面解释,而没有深入探讨和详尽的研究。为了了解主要释文之间的不同之处,及其释义是否是否相驳作了探讨,提出自己的看法。本文属驳论文章,驳论文不外乎反驳他人的观点,树立自己的观点。这两者不管是哪一个,都需要正确的论据。论据分理论论据和类推论据两种。这里依靠理论和类推两种论据阐述了自己的新观点。更是通过现代学术论文的写作方法,运用提出问题,分析问题,解决问题的方法,多方角度去解释和辨析礼赞的寓意。这便是这篇论文的新颖和开创之处。关于论文创新之处:(1)在论述礼赞产生和发展问题时提出礼赞最初出现于何种论典。在论述“礼赞”名表示何义和礼赞对象时,提出“礼赞”的不同对象,即何可礼赞、何不可礼赞。(2)礼赞的分类,虽在一般释文来曾提到,可实际释文中,可分为三种,一是按文章文体分类、二是按礼赞文体分类、三是按文章与礼赞是否统一方面分类。(3)作礼赞的必要性方面,此非物力比量此认识的对象,只有从三量洞察清净之圣言去认识。(4)在分析《释量论》礼赞时,主要对不同释文的解说进行比较,分析它们之间是否相度还是相违,提出了自己的看法。(5)在探讨自宗的诠释法时,分析了从实际礼赞诠释、从皈依声语门诠释、从文章体裁诠释、从《释量论》四品次第诠释、从讲释经论五分支法诠释等方法,对《释量论》礼赞作了力所能及的探讨,提出来自己的看法。请各位教授专家批评指正。
[Abstract]:Praise is one of the three branches of the classics. Writing culture through one of the three or one of the three is not only the unique traditional writing format of the ancient Indian and Tibetan writers, but also an important symbol to identify the author and his works belonging to the inside and outside. As a kind of special and profound praise, the praise of the interpretation of quantity theory has the characteristics of the integration of the three gates which are not found in other classics. The author intends to complete the discussion in two parts: the outline of Raizhuan and the detailed explanation of Raizan. There are very few articles I have seen about praise, and they are imperfect and flawed. Therefore, this paper divides into five parts: the initial formation reason, the moral of praise name, the object of praise, the classification and necessity of praise. There are only a few expositions in the explanation of quantity theory, and no special research is carried out. However, the author of the interpretation only interprets it literally, without further exploration and detailed study. In order to understand the differences between the main interpretations and whether the interpretation is contradictory, the author puts forward his own views. This article is a refutation of articles, refuting the views of others, to establish their own views. Either of these two needs the right argument. There are two kinds of arguments: theoretical arguments and analogies. Here rely on theory and analogies two kinds of argument to expound own new viewpoint. Through the writing method of modern academic papers, it uses the methods of asking questions, analyzing problems, solving problems, explaining and discriminating the moral of praise from various angles. This is the novelty and creation of this paper. The innovations of the thesis are as follows: (1) when discussing the emergence and development of praise, the author puts forward the initial exposition of praise. In discussing the meaning and object of "praise", it is proposed that the different objects of "praise", that is, what can be praised and what cannot be praised. (2) although the classification of praise has been mentioned in the general interpretation, it can be divided into three types in the actual interpretation. First, according to the style of the article, second, according to the style of praise, third, according to whether the article and praise are unified or not. (3) the necessity of being complimentary, this is not the material resources to measure the object of this understanding, Only from three insights into the pure holy words to understand. (4) in the analysis of the "release of quantity" praise, mainly on the interpretation of different interpretations to compare, to analyze whether they are degree or not, The author puts forward his own views. (5) in discussing the hermeneutics of self-hermeneutics, this paper analyzes the interpretation from the actual praise, from the door of conversion, from the genre of the article, from the interpretation of the four articles, from the interpretation of the Sutra, from the interpretation of the five branches, etc. In this paper, the author discusses how much he can and puts forward his own views. Professors and experts are invited to criticize and correct.
【学位授予单位】：青海民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B948
本文编号：2206666
[Abstract]:Praise is one of the three branches of the classics. Writing culture through one of the three or one of the three is not only the unique traditional writing format of the ancient Indian and Tibetan writers, but also an important symbol to identify the author and his works belonging to the inside and outside. As a kind of special and profound praise, the praise of the interpretation of quantity theory has the characteristics of the integration of the three gates which are not found in other classics. The author intends to complete the discussion in two parts: the outline of Raizhuan and the detailed explanation of Raizan. There are very few articles I have seen about praise, and they are imperfect and flawed. Therefore, this paper divides into five parts: the initial formation reason, the moral of praise name, the object of praise, the classification and necessity of praise. There are only a few expositions in the explanation of quantity theory, and no special research is carried out. However, the author of the interpretation only interprets it literally, without further exploration and detailed study. In order to understand the differences between the main interpretations and whether the interpretation is contradictory, the author puts forward his own views. This article is a refutation of articles, refuting the views of others, to establish their own views. Either of these two needs the right argument. There are two kinds of arguments: theoretical arguments and analogies. Here rely on theory and analogies two kinds of argument to expound own new viewpoint. Through the writing method of modern academic papers, it uses the methods of asking questions, analyzing problems, solving problems, explaining and discriminating the moral of praise from various angles. This is the novelty and creation of this paper. The innovations of the thesis are as follows: (1) when discussing the emergence and development of praise, the author puts forward the initial exposition of praise. In discussing the meaning and object of "praise", it is proposed that the different objects of "praise", that is, what can be praised and what cannot be praised. (2) although the classification of praise has been mentioned in the general interpretation, it can be divided into three types in the actual interpretation. First, according to the style of the article, second, according to the style of praise, third, according to whether the article and praise are unified or not. (3) the necessity of being complimentary, this is not the material resources to measure the object of this understanding, Only from three insights into the pure holy words to understand. (4) in the analysis of the "release of quantity" praise, mainly on the interpretation of different interpretations to compare, to analyze whether they are degree or not, The author puts forward his own views. (5) in discussing the hermeneutics of self-hermeneutics, this paper analyzes the interpretation from the actual praise, from the door of conversion, from the genre of the article, from the interpretation of the four articles, from the interpretation of the Sutra, from the interpretation of the five branches, etc. In this paper, the author discusses how much he can and puts forward his own views. Professors and experts are invited to criticize and correct.
【学位授予单位】：青海民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B948
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 日进;;《释量论》已经出版[J];法音;1982年03期
2 胡继欧;;缅怀恩师尊公上人[J];法音;1991年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 西藏自治区古籍保护中心 白张 萨仁高娃;西藏博物馆藏《释量论》元至元间第三帝师达玛巴拉大都刻本[N];光明日报;2013年
2 柯志雄;林清渠：饮水思佛源[N];21世纪经济报道;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 才让当知;浅谈释量论之礼赞[D];青海民族大学;2017年
2 彭毛卡先;“量识”是否必为“新知”探析[D];青海民族大学;2012年
，本文编号：2206666
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zjlw/2206666.html
