“三教融合”质疑

发布时间：2019-04-23 11:34

【摘要】："三教融合"或"三教合一"曾被认为是儒释道三教在初期的冲突、争斗之后的基本发展趋势,也被看作是中国文化交流与融合的显著特征。但细察儒释道三教的各自发展理路、国家的教化政策与普通民众对三教的认识,就会发现"三教融合"或"三教合一"对三教自身而言只是一种立足自身、互相渗透吸收、谋求发展的策略,对统治者来说仅仅是一种文化政策,对民间宗教与信仰而言,则是其功利性信仰特征的反映。所以,"三教合一"的实质是被三教内部人士、统治集团,以及谋求生存的民间宗教信仰共同"创造"出来的文化舆论氛围,它不仅未能如实地反映"三教"各自发展的真实情况,也不能直接反映"三教"之间的实际关系。无论是作为哲学思想还是宗教信仰,"三教"都各自保持着自己的独立性、稳定性和持续发展性。
[Abstract]:"the integration of the three religions" or "the integration of the three religions" was once considered to be the conflict between Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism and Taoism in the initial period, and the basic development trend after the struggle was also regarded as a remarkable feature of the exchange and integration of Chinese culture. But if we look closely at the respective development of Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism and the three religions, the country's educational policy and the common people's understanding of the three religions, we will find that "the integration of the three religions" or "the unity of the three religions" is just a kind of self-reliance and mutual infiltration and absorption for the three religions themselves. The strategy of seeking development is merely a cultural policy for the ruler and a reflection of the characteristics of utilitarian belief for the folk religion and belief. Therefore, the essence of "the unity of the three religions" is the atmosphere of cultural public opinion jointly "created" by the insiders of the three religions, the ruling groups, and the folk religious beliefs seeking to survive. It not only fails to reflect the true situation of the development of the "three religions", but also can not directly reflect the actual relationship between the "three religions". Both as philosophical thoughts and religious beliefs, the three religions maintain their own independence, stability and sustainable development.
【作者单位】：济南大学历史与文化产业学院;
【分类号】：B929

【参考文献】