公民自愿主义、大众传媒与公共环保行为——基于中国CGSS2013数据的实证分析

发布时间：2018-04-04 08:05

本文选题：政治参与　切入点：资源　出处：《公共行政评论》2017年05期

【摘要】：为什么有些公众不参与而有些公众参与公共环保活动?论文从公民自愿主义、大众传媒视角,利用中国综合社会调查2013年数据,分析了客观资源条件、主观心理愿意、社会网络动员、大众传媒等因素对公共环保行为的影响。研究结果表明,公民自愿主义、大众传媒对公共环保行为具有更强的解释力。客观资源条件中的受教育年限,主观心理愿意中的环境关心、环保责任感,社会网络动员中的就业状况、政治身份、社会互动显著正向影响公共环保行为。相反,语言表达能力、环境污染关注显著负向影响公共环保行为。大众传媒需区分为电视传媒和非电视传媒,电视传媒显著负向影响公共环保行为,非电视传媒显著正向影响公共环保行为。上述研究发现有利于拓展公众环保行为理论,为政府提升公众公共环保行为提供政策参考。
[Abstract]:Why is it that some members of the public are not involved in public environmental protection activities while others are involved in public environmental protection activities?From the perspective of citizen voluntarism and mass media, the paper analyzes the influence of objective resource conditions, subjective psychological willingness, social network mobilization, mass media and other factors on public environmental protection behavior by using the data of Chinese comprehensive social survey in 2013.The results show that the citizen voluntary, mass media has a stronger explanation for public environmental protection behavior.The years of education in the objective resource condition, the environmental concern in subjective psychology, the sense of responsibility for environmental protection, the employment situation in the mobilization of social network, the political identity and the social interaction have a significant positive effect on the public environmental protection behavior.On the contrary, language expression and environmental pollution concern have a significant negative effect on public environmental behavior.The mass media should be divided into TV media and non-TV media. The TV media has a negative influence on public environmental protection behavior, while the non-TV media has a significant positive impact on public environmental protection behavior.The findings are helpful to expand the theory of public environmental behavior and provide policy reference for the government to promote public environmental behavior.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院;
【分类号】：C912.6;X321

【相似文献】