欧盟“航空减排指令”及中国的应对之道——以共同但有区别责任原则为视角

发布时间：2018-04-21 07:30

本文选题：共同但有区别责任 + 航空减排指令　；参考：《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：在气候容量资源有限的的前提下,如何界定公约各方的权利和义务一直是气候国际公约的目标。对于《联合国气候变化框架公约》的缔约国来说,共同但有区别的责任原则具有法律拘束力。这一原则在最新的气候变化《巴黎公约》中得到坚持和强调。在减少温室气体排放这一问题上,中国有权按照共同但有区别的责任原则主张承担与自身能力相适应的减排责任。鉴于欧盟"航空减排指令"并不符合该原则,中国可通过国际民用航空组织提议修改该指令。新的指令应当尊重国际民航组织议定的效果标准。在效果等同的情况下,应赋予航空器飞离国以优先管辖权。与此同时,中国应建立总量控制和交易制度,以兼容欧盟的排放权交易体系。
[Abstract]:Under the premise of limited climate capacity, how to define the rights and obligations of the parties to the convention has always been the goal of the international climate convention. For parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change, the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities is legally binding. This principle was upheld and emphasized in the latest Paris Pact on Climate change. On the issue of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, China has the right to assume responsibility for reducing greenhouse gas emissions commensurate with its capabilities, in accordance with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. Since the EU's Air emissions reduction Directive is not in line with that principle, China could propose a change to the directive through the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The new directive should respect the standards of effectiveness agreed upon by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). In the case of equal effect, priority jurisdiction shall be given to aircraft departure from the country. At the same time, China should establish a cap-and-trade system to be compatible with the European Union's emissions trading system.
【作者单位】：澳门科技大学法学院;
【分类号】：X738

【参考文献】