里湖地下河N、S来源及其水-岩作用过程
[Abstract]:Groundwater is one of the main freshwater resources in the world. In karst areas, especially in the karst areas of Southwest China, groundwater has become a good source of water supply because of its relatively abundant reserves and excellent water quality. However, in recent years, reports of pollution of karst groundwater have only increased, including groundwater pollution caused by excessive nitrate and sulfate. It is urgent to control the deterioration of groundwater quality caused by excessive nitrate and sulfate. Therefore, it is very important to clarify the source of urban pollutants and reduce sulfate from the source. Rapid transformation, nitrate and sulfate pollution occur randomly, the mechanism process is complex, the way of dispersal and emission is uncertain, and also has the characteristics of long-distance migration, it is very difficult to trace the source, using a single index to identify its pollution source is often lack of pertinence and scientific, need to combine a variety of isotopes separately. At the same time, anthropogenic discharge of sulfuric acid and nitric acid into the underground river system participates in the process of water-rock interaction, resulting in spatio-temporal differences in the intensity of water-rock interaction, changing the composition of groundwater and its geochemical cycle, interfering with the carbon sink effect produced by carbonate dissolution carbonate rocks. In the study area, sulfur isotopes, nitrogen and oxygen isotopes were combined with traditional hydrochemical methods to analyze the composition of groundwater and its influencing factors, reveal the sources of sulfate and nitrate in the underground rivers of Lihu Lake, and estimate the intensity of water-rock interaction under the participation of sulfuric acid and nitric acid by hydrochemical methods. The hydrochemical type of the basin is HCO_3~-Ca. The geochemical composition of groundwater is controlled by the natural weathering and dissolution of carbonate rocks. Under the combined influence of artificial input, precipitation dilution and river self-purification, the ion concentrations in the dry season are higher than those in the rainy season. The spatial fluctuation of the groundwater is decreasing from upstream to downstream. It is inferred that SO_4~ (2-) in underground rivers is affected by urban sewage, chemical fertilizer and acid rain by the ratio of - 4.12 ~ - 0.93, and the value of 34 S is slightly higher in agricultural season than that in dry season, and the fluctuation is larger. It is possible that the groundwater is mixed with chemical fertilizers with relatively higher value of (34) S-SO_4 (2-); and the value of (15) N-HCO_3 82 Between, the average is 8.20, between - 6.71 ~77.04, the average is 12.58. Combined with the analysis of nitrate nitrogen and oxygen isotope composition, the source of HCO_3 - in underground rivers has obvious seasonal differences. The sources of HCO_3 - in January 2015 are complex. In May and October 2014, the groundwater HCO_3 - is mainly subject to synthetic fertilizers, human and animal manure, sewage and soil. In July 2015, the main source of nitrogen mixing was synthetic fertilizer and was affected by the high precipitation of (18)O-HCO_3~-. The groundwater (13)C-DIC was distributed between - 10.74 - 4.34, with an average value of - 7.36. The carbon isotope composition was affected by both natural carbonation and human input of sulfuric acid and nitric acid. In Nanshan, Wujiang and other places, the ratio of Ca~ (2+) + Mg~ (2+) / [HCO_3~-] equivalent in groundwater is between 1.12 and 1.56, [SO_4~ (2-) + HCO_3~-] / [HCO_3~-] ratio is between 0.11 and 0.50, indicating that sulfuric acid and nitric acid are involved in water-rock interaction. According to hydrochemical calculation, the proportion of carbonate dissolution carbonate rocks ranges from 28.04% to 78.55%, with an average of 50.01%. Affected by the time of water-rock interaction, the ratio of dissolution in dry season is larger than that in rainy season, and the spatial dissolution capacity is the strongest in the Xiaolong cave downstream; the ratio of sulfuric acid and nitric acid dissolution carbonate rocks ranges from 21.45% to 71.96%, with an average of 49.71%. Under the influence of agricultural activities, the strongest dissolution capacity appeared in May 2014, which was affected by the intensity of human activities and the self-purification of water. The dissolution intensity was generally shown in the upper reaches of agricultural activities and the lower reaches of industrial sewage discharge areas with less disturbance of human activities.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:X523;P641.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 裴建国,章程,谢运球,翁金桃;云霄洞地下河开发利用及洪涝灾害治理[J];中国岩溶;2000年02期
2 郭纯青;中国岩溶地下河系及其水资源[J];水文地质工程地质;2001年05期
3 谢运球,袁道先;地下河系统水土资源关系[J];水土保持学报;2002年06期
4 谢运球,裴建国;板文地下河系统内涝[J];地质灾害与环境保护;2002年04期
5 郭芳,姜光辉,裴建国,章程;广西主要地下河水质评价及其变化趋势[J];中国岩溶;2002年03期
6 杨群兴;;广东黎水地下河开发利用研究[J];水文地质工程地质;2006年03期
7 覃小群;蒋忠诚;李庆松;易连兴;;广西岩溶区地下河分布特征与开发利用[J];水文地质工程地质;2007年06期
8 蒲俊兵;袁道先;蒋勇军;;重庆市地下河的空间分布及水资源[J];水文地质工程地质;2009年02期
9 邹胜章;于晓英;卢海平;;基于自动监测的柳州鸡喇地下河水质变化特征[J];中国岩溶;2011年01期
10 熊康宁;王恒松;李贵云;陈东升;;奔流在贵州地下的河[J];森林与人类;2013年07期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 ;世界级地下河待开发[A];广州市老工程师协会论文集(第四辑)[C];2008年
2 刘景兰;郭纯青;;广西岩溶地下河系初步研究[A];第三届广西青年学术年会论文集(自然科学篇)[C];2004年
3 卢庆林;;郴州万华岩地下河—溶洞群形成背景及形成阶段初探[A];飞天山丹霞地貌与生态旅游学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 刘维;大西南:地下河的隐忧[N];地质勘查导报;2007年
2 本报记者 张孔生;地下河连接市区3河道[N];扬州日报;2010年
3 苏橹萱;我国西南岩溶地下河有污染趋势[N];中国国土资源报;2011年
4 特约记者 苏橹萱;地下河硝酸盐超标主因系农家肥施用[N];中国国土资源报;2011年
5 张孔生;地上景观路 地下活水流[N];扬州日报;2010年
6 陆汉魁;广西发现串珠式岩溶地下河天窗群[N];中国国土资源报;2008年
7 本报通讯员 黄强;把水留住[N];中国国土资源报;2011年
8 赵应繁;鄂西南岩溶地区首次找到地下河[N];中国国土资源报;2008年
9 本报记者 蓝锋 本报通讯员 李雪松;都安有条“世界级”地下河[N];广西日报;2013年
10 王琴;贵州地矿局大做“水”文章[N];中国矿业报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 裴建国;寨底地下河系统水质演化趋势及碳汇通量分析[D];中国地质大学(北京);2012年
2 蒲俊兵;重庆市地下河发育、分布的控制机制及水文地球化学区域特征研究[D];西南大学;2011年
3 蓝家程;岩溶地下河系统中多环芳烃的迁移、分配及生态风险研究[D];西南大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 梁作兵;基于脂肪酸示踪岩溶地下河中DOM来源及迁移、变化特征[D];西南大学;2016年
2 李瑞;里湖地下河N、S来源及其水-岩作用过程[D];西南大学;2016年
3 袁文昊;土壤微生物活动下的氮、磷变化及对地下河水质的影响研究[D];西南大学;2009年
4 郭芳;官村地下河流域氮流失及其影响因素研究[D];西南大学;2008年
5 颜赫;岩溶槽谷区地下河的水质特征对比研究[D];西南大学;2014年
6 韦丽丽;岩溶地下河系统持久性有机污染物分布与迁移研究[D];西南大学;2011年
7 曹嘉一弘;四川盆地盆周山地地下河发育分布规律统计分析[D];成都理工大学;2013年
8 杨光照;岩溶山区高位地下河成库条件研究[D];贵州大学;2008年
9 胡大超;岩溶地下河雨季~(15)N同位素及微常量元素特征研究[D];西南大学;2011年
10 薛倩倩;岩溶槽谷地下河系统动态变化及含水介质各向异性对比研究[D];西南大学;2014年
,本文编号:2179764
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/2179764.html