卧位牵引联合音乐电疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效观察
本文关键词:卧位牵引联合音乐电疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效观察 出处:《黑龙江中医药大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:研究目的:神经根型颈椎病发病缓慢,发病率高且较常见,已经成为社会关注的问题,这种疾病给患者带来不可忽视且严重的身体上的巨大折磨和精神上的巨大痛苦,严重影响了人们生活质量和工作效率。本研究通过观察分析卧位牵引疗法联合音乐电疗法对神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效,旨在探索其临床疗效及规律,为临床治疗该病提供一定的参考依据。研究方法:本研究中所有神经根型颈椎病患者来源于2016年4月至2017年1月黑龙江中医药大学附属二院门诊就诊患者。严格按照纳入标准,将符合要求神经根型颈椎病患者,随机地分为治疗组(卧位牵引联合音乐电疗法)和对照组(单纯卧位牵引治疗),进行为期15天的临床治疗,参考《中医病证诊断疗效标准》所制定的颈椎病临床疗效标准,并参阅简化McGill疼痛量表(MPQ)、颈部残障功能指数量表(NDI)和日本田中靖久症状量表20分法进行临床疗效评估,上述量表的评估于入组第一天和疗程结束后分别进行评分,确保准确性、完整性、及时性。研究结果:治疗前,两组患者资料在性别、年龄、病程分布以及症状量表评分方面无显著性差异(P0.05),具有可比性。治疗后,治疗组有效率89.58%、对照组有效率77.08%,组间比较有显著性差异(P0.05)。治疗组McGill疼痛询问量表评分,治疗前为20.29 ± 6.47,治疗后为8.10 ± 5.55,组内前后统计比较有显著性差异(P0.05);对照组McGill疼痛询问量表评分,治疗前为20.10±6.33,治疗后为10.63±6.17,前后统计比较有显著性差异(P0.05),且治疗后组间比较,差异有显著性(P0.05)。治疗组颈部残障功能指数量表评分,治疗前为21.06± 6.16,治疗后为7.63 ±5.11,组内前后统计比较有显著性差异(P0.05);对照组颈部残障功能指数量表评分,治疗前为21.04±6.03,治疗后为10.02±6.01,组内前后统计比较有显著性差异(P0.05),且组间治疗后比较有显著性差异(P0.05)。治疗组日本田中靖久症状量化表评分,治疗前为10.25± 1.89,治疗后为16.04±2.29,组内前后统计比较有显著性差异(P0.05);对照组日本田中靖久症状量化表评分,治疗前为9.88 ±2.06,治疗后为14.40 土 2.71,组内前后统计比较有显著性差异(P0.05),且组间治疗后比较有显著性差异(P0.05)。结论:卧位牵引联合音乐电疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效显著,能明显地改善神经根型颈椎病的临床症状和体征,明显优于单纯卧位牵引疗法,操作简便,患者易于接受,值得临床上推广使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: To study the pathogenesis of cervical spondylosis of nerve root type slow, high incidence and more common, has become a social concern, the disease has brought great pain and suffering great spirit can not be ignored and serious in the body to the patients, and seriously affect the quality of life and work efficiency of people. The purpose of this study is to observe and analyze the clinical effect of decubitus traction therapy combined with music electrotherapy on cervical spondylotic radicular disease, so as to explore its clinical efficacy and regularity, so as to provide certain reference for clinical treatment of this disease. Methods: all patients with cervical spondylosis of the nerve root type were from the outpatient department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University Of Chinese Medicine from April 2016 to January 2017. In strict accordance with the inclusion criteria, will meet the requirements of patients with nerve root type cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into treatment group (supine traction combined with music therapy) and control group (simple supine traction), clinical treatment for a period of 15 days, cervical spondylosis clinical criteria established by reference to the "standard" of TCM syndrome diagnosis the curative effect, and refer to the simplified McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), neck disability index (NDI) and Japan Tanaka Yasushi long symptom scale 20 points method to evaluate the clinical curative effect, evaluation of the scale in the group and the first day after the end of treatment were scored, ensure the accuracy, completeness, timeliness. Results: before treatment, there was no significant difference in gender, age, course distribution and symptom scale score between the two groups (P0.05). After treatment, the effective rate of the treatment group was 89.58%, the effective rate of the control group was 77.08%, and there was a significant difference between the groups (P0.05). The treatment group McGill pain questionnaire score before treatment was 20.29 + 6.47, 8.10 + 5.55 after treatment, treatment and statistical difference (P0.05); control group McGill pain questionnaire score before treatment was 20.10 + 6.33, 10.63 + 6.17 after treatment, there was statistical comparison before and after (P0.05), and the difference between two groups after treatment, there were significant differences (P0.05). The treatment group the neck disability index score before treatment was 21.06 + 6.16, 7.63 + 5.11 after treatment, treatment and statistical significant difference (P0.05); control group, neck disability index score before treatment was 21.04 + 6.03, 10.02 + 6.01 after treatment, group before and after statistical significant difference (P0.05), and between group difference after treatment (P0.05). The treatment group of Japan Tanaka Yasushi long symptom scale, before treatment was 10.25 + 1.89, 16.04 + 2.29 after treatment, treatment and statistical difference (P0.05); the control group of Japan Tanaka Yasushi long symptom scale, before treatment was 9.88 + 2.06, after treatment was 14.40 + 2.71, group in the statistics before and after significant difference (P0.05), and between group difference after treatment (P0.05). Conclusion: lying position traction combined with music electrotherapy is effective in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radicular disease. It can significantly improve the clinical symptoms and signs of cervical spondylotic radicular disease, which is superior to the simple position traction therapy. It is easy to operate and easy to accept, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R681.55
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王丽;许凤娟;张新恒;范文祥;刘孟;倪朝民;;颈项肌肌力训练联合综合物理因子治疗在颈椎病康复治疗的临床观察[J];颈腰痛杂志;2016年05期
2 孙昱玮;姜虹旭;唐继贵;岳小强;;牵引联合中频治疗神经根型颈椎病临床观察[J];临床军医杂志;2016年06期
3 毛桂华;马轩;姬伟强;张伟;杨伟庆;;曲度牵引结合中频治疗仪治疗颈型颈椎病50例[J];河南中医;2016年02期
4 李艳;吴耀持;范兴良;孙懿君;;基于腋神经分布针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病肩臂痛临床研究[J];中国针灸;2016年02期
5 王一;蔚浩;周睿;;多方法评价仰卧位屈颈牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的随机对照研究[J];华西医学;2016年01期
6 符积勤;周利民;;加味羌活汤内服和离子导入治疗风寒湿痹证神经根型颈椎病67例临床分析[J];中国实验方剂学杂志;2015年20期
7 景海龙;王喜祥;;颈椎牵引配合手法整复治疗神经根型颈椎病320例临床观察[J];中医临床研究;2015年23期
8 麻国尧;汪芳俊;魏威;叶杨;;不同角度牵引治疗颈椎病的生物力学研究[J];中华全科医学;2015年08期
9 李冠豪;曹淑;;热敏灸治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J];四川中医;2015年07期
10 吕雪城;;颈舒颗粒联合电脑中频治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效分析[J];中国实用神经疾病杂志;2015年10期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张苓;中医综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[D];南京中医药大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李超;卧位牵引针灸治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床观察[D];黑龙江中医药大学;2016年
2 修宇;手三针配合颈夹脊穴针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病临床研究[D];辽宁中医药大学;2016年
3 黄维俊;CAJ热灸治疗仪治疗颈椎病颈痛的临床研究[D];广州中医药大学;2015年
4 黄娟;曲度牵引治疗青年颈型颈椎病的临床对照研究[D];安徽医科大学;2016年
5 汪宏宽;养血活血汤治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床观察[D];湖北中医药大学;2014年
6 李元鑫;音乐电针文献研究[D];黑龙江省中医药科学院;2014年
7 李书纳;拔伸旋转手法对神经根型颈椎病肌电图变化的影响[D];河南中医学院;2014年
8 鄂远;神经根型颈椎病的证候分型及中医治疗方案构建的研究[D];南京中医药大学;2014年
9 罗丽红;热敏灸结合针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床观察[D];广州中医药大学;2012年
10 鞠晓军;卧位整脊推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[D];山东中医药大学;2012年
,本文编号:1342252
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/mpalunwen/1342252.html