PTBD和ERCP治疗泡型肝包虫病合并梗阻性黄疸的疗效对比
本文选题:泡型肝包虫病 切入点:PTBD 出处:《青海大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:通过对比PTBD和ERCP治疗HAE合并梗阻性黄疸患者的疗效,为临床选择一种更优的方法来缓解晚期HAE患者的黄疸情况提供参考。方法:收集青海大学附属医院2012年1月至2016年9月就诊的初步诊断为肝包虫病患者的病例资料,按纳入排除标准筛选符合条件的HAE合并梗阻性黄疸患者,分为PTBD组和ERCP组,比较两组患者的术后疗效、住院费用及预后情况。结果:1.共收集病例治疗资料1189例,其中符合纳入排除标准41例,行PTBD治疗23例,行ERCP治疗18例。两组患者的年龄、性别、民族、包虫抗体、HBV感染、病灶位置、病灶大小、梗阻部位、病灶坏死、N分期、M分期、术前手术史、术前肝功能分级等指标差别均无统计学意义(P0.05);PTBD组术前重度以上黄疸的患者较ERCP组多,ERCP组病灶钙化和处于P1、P2期的患者较PTBD组多(P0.05)。2.PTBD组和ERCP组患者术后一般状况较前好转,术后不同时期两组TBIL、DBIL、TBA、γ-GT、ALP等黄疸指标较术前均明显下降(P0.05);术后TBIL下降程度,PTBD组较ERCP组更明显(P0.05)。3.术后两组间ALT、AST、CHE、ALB、PT、APTT、PLT等其它肝功能指标差别无统计学意义(P0.05)。4.在入院时和出院时患者黄疸比较,PTBD组和ERCP组患者TBIL水平均下降,差别有统计学意义(P0.01);在入院时和出院时肝功能Child分级比较上,PTBD组差别有统计学意义(P0.05),ERCP组差别无统计学意义(P0.05)。5.术前ALB水平是影响HAE患者术前黄疸程度的保护性因素(P0.05,OR1)。6.胆囊炎、术前ALB、术前PLT是影响HAE患者术后是否发生并发症的保护性因素(P0.05,OR1),病灶M分期是影响HAE患者预后的保护性因素(P0.05,HR1)。7.PTBD组治疗费用低于ERCP组(P0.05),但两组间住院总费用差别无统计学意义(P0.05)。8.两组间在术后并发症发生率和预后生存率方面差别无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:PTBD和ERCP均有效降低HAE患者胆红素及梗阻性黄疸相关肝功能指标水平,改善患者一般情况,但两者均未明显改善非黄疸直接相关肝功能指标。PTBD和ERCP在术后并发症发生率和预后生存率方面可能没有差异。PTBD相比于ERCP操作简单,治疗费用更低,但两者住院总费用无差别。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the efficacy of PTBD and ERCP in the treatment of HAE with obstructive jaundice. To provide a reference for clinical selection of a better method to alleviate jaundice in patients with advanced HAE. Methods: data of patients with hepatic hydatidosis diagnosed in the affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University from January 2012 to September 2016 were collected. According to the exclusion criteria, HAE patients with obstructive jaundice were selected and divided into two groups: PTBD group and ERCP group. The curative effect, hospitalization cost and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Among them, 41 cases were included in the exclusion criteria, 23 cases were treated with PTBD and 18 cases were treated with ERCP. The age, sex, nationality, hydatid antibody infection, location, size, site of obstruction and N stage M stage of lesion necrosis were observed in the two groups. History of preoperative surgery, There was no significant difference in preoperative liver function grading between patients with severe jaundice before operation and patients with severe jaundice before operation in ERCP group than those in PTBD group with more calcification and P1P _ 2 stage than those in PTBD group. 2. The general postoperative status of patients in PTBD group and ERCP group was better than that in PTBD group. The jaundice indexes such as TBILD DBILP TBA, 纬 -GTT ALP in two groups were significantly lower than those before operation (P 0.05), and the degree of TBIL decrease after operation in PTBD group was significantly higher than that in ERCP group (P 0.05. 3). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other liver function indexes such as ALB PTTTPLT and so on. The level of TBIL in patients with jaundice was lower than that in patients with ERCP and PTBD. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.01), and there was no significant difference in Child grade of liver function between admission and discharge. Preoperative ALB level was a protective factor affecting the degree of preoperative jaundice in HAE patients (P 0.05 OR1. 6). Preoperative ALB, preoperative PLT is a protective factor influencing the occurrence of postoperative complications in patients with HAE (P0.05 OR1). The M stage of lesion is a protective factor affecting the prognosis of HAE patients. The cost of treatment in the PLT group is lower than that in the ERCP group, but there is no difference in total hospitalization cost between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications and the survival rate of prognosis. Conclusion both ERCP and ERCP can effectively reduce the level of bilirubin and liver function related to obstructive jaundice in patients with HAE. There may be no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and survival rate between PTBD and ERCP. Compared with ERCP, the operation of PTBD is simpler and the cost of treatment is lower than that of ERCP. But there was no difference in the total cost of hospitalization between the two groups.
【学位授予单位】:青海大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R657.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 毛建生;刘华;陈永明;何雪云;占路娟;;急诊ERCP治疗在老年人急性胆源性胰腺炎中的应用[J];中国农村卫生事业管理;2011年10期
2 周寨文;苏小康;钟崇;罗琦;韩伟强;;通腑法联合ERCP治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎临床研究[J];新中医;2011年10期
3 国向东;朱洪春;王淑英;;急诊ERCP治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎54例临床分析[J];医学综述;2012年16期
4 张瑞云;;ERCP治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的临床疗效观察[J];药物与人;2014年07期
5 李友珠;;急诊ERCP治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的护理配合[J];中国误诊学杂志;2008年02期
6 杨少英;;ERCP治疗急性梗阻化脓性胆管炎48例临床护理[J];齐鲁护理杂志;2012年25期
7 江堤;张莉;苏剑东;刘玉杰;廖秀敏;麦海珠;杨巧玲;;急诊ERCP治疗老年人急性化脓性胆管炎48例临床分析[J];中国医药指南;2012年18期
8 徐姝嫣;孙源源;;ERCP治疗急性化脓性梗阻性胆管炎42例分析[J];南通大学学报(医学版);2013年06期
9 张亚飞;吴兵;周景丽;武阿丽;;ERCP治疗急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎38例[J];吉林医学;2011年11期
10 黄勤;林敏华;何赛琴;周贤斌;张金顺;;ERCP治疗毕Ⅱ式胃空肠吻合术后合并胆管结石[J];现代实用医学;2010年09期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 吴裕文;;早期治疗性ERCP治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎50例分析[A];江西省第四次中西医结合消化系统疾病学术交流会论文汇编[C];2011年
2 李宝莲;;胆管癌、壶腹癌ERCP治疗的护理[A];全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2006年
3 盛建文;范惠珍;吴裕文;;早期经胃管给予中药“清胰汤”联合ERCP治疗急性胆源性重症胰腺炎的临床研究[A];第二十五届全国中西医结合消化系统疾病学术会议论文集[C];2013年
4 郑丰平;陶力;;胆道术后良性胆道狭窄ERCP治疗效果[A];中华医学会第七次全国消化病学术会议论文汇编(下册)[C];2007年
5 李勇;秦明放;王庆;李宁;;急诊ERCP治疗胆道胰腺疾病的临床探讨(附1236例报告)[A];第九届全国中西医结合普通外科学术交流大会暨胆道胰腺疾病新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 席宇晶;ERCP治疗胆总管结石合并十二指肠乳头旁憩室的临床研究[D];广西医科大学;2016年
2 郭晓艳;ERCP治疗老年人胆总管结石的临床分析[D];广西医科大学;2017年
3 刘志胜;PTBD和ERCP治疗泡型肝包虫病合并梗阻性黄疸的疗效对比[D];青海大学;2017年
4 李弋飞;ERCP治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎50例病例分析[D];吉林大学;2011年
5 徐超;ERCP治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎随机对照试验的Meta分析[D];河北医科大学;2009年
,本文编号:1677050
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/mpalunwen/1677050.html