当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 医学硕士论文 >

新疆地区维、汉民族PCI术后血栓弹力图检测下抗血小板药物抵抗差异性研究

发布时间:2018-07-26 17:25
【摘要】:目的:探讨通过血栓弹力图对接受PCI术的维、汉民族冠心病患者的抗血小板药物的血小板抑制率检测,分析不同民族间对抗血小板药物抵抗率是否存在差异,探讨抗血小板药物抵抗是否影响患者预后。方法:选取2015年8月至2016年10月在新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院心内科择期接受PCI治疗的冠心病患者128例,按照民族差异分为维吾尔族组68例和汉族组60例,所有患者于PCI术后抽血化验血栓弹力图,检测其AA诱导的血小板抑制率,ADP诱导的血小板抑制率,ADP诱导的凝血块强度(MAADP).分析不同民族间血小板抑制率是否存在差异。对所有患者出院后进行3个月的随访,记录其主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生情况。分析抗血小板药物抵抗与预后关系。结果:两组患者年龄、性别、个人史、相关疾病史无统计学意义(P0.05)。总共有22例(17.19%)患者发生氯吡格雷抵抗,其中汉族患者6例(10.00%),维族患者16例(23.53%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。共有13例(10.16%)患者发生阿司匹林抵抗,其中汉族患者6例(10.00%),维患者7例(10.29%),差异无统计学意义(P=0.956)。MAADP异常(≥50mm)的共有16人(12.50%),其中汉族患者中3人(5.00%)MAADP异常,维吾尔族患者中13人异常(19.12%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。3个月随访当中共有14位患者发生主要心血管不良事件(MACE),其中氯吡格雷反应正常的患者中发生MACE事件有8人,发生率为7.55%,而氯吡格雷抵抗的患者中发生MACE事件的有6人,发生率为27.27%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。阿司匹林反应正常的患者中发生MACE事件的有11人,MACE事件发生率为9.57%,阿司匹林抵抗的13例患者中有3人发生MACE事件,发生率为23.08%,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。MAADP正常的患者中发生MACE事件的有9人,发生率为8.04%,MAADP异常的患者中发生MACE事件的有5人,发生率为31.25%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:PCI术后维、汉民族患者之间阿司匹林抵抗无差异,而氯吡格雷抵抗存在差异,且维吾尔族患者氯吡格雷抵抗发生率较汉族患者高。PCI术后阿司匹林抵抗不增加MACE事件的发生率,而氯吡格雷抵抗增加MACE事件的发生率。PCI术后MAADP≥50mm时增加MACE事件的发生率。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the platelet inhibition rate of antiplatelet drugs in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in Han nationality by thromboelastography, and to analyze whether there are differences in anti-platelet drug resistance rate among different nationalities. To investigate whether anti-platelet drug resistance affects the prognosis of patients. Methods: from August 2015 to October 2016, 128 patients with coronary heart disease received PCI treatment in cardiology department, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region people's Hospital, and were divided into Uygur group (68 cases) and Han nationality group (60 cases) according to their ethnic differences. Thromboelastograms were taken from all patients after PCI. The platelet inhibition rate induced by AA was measured. The platelet inhibition rate induced by ADP and clot strength (MAADP). Induced by ADP were measured. To analyze whether there are differences in platelet inhibition rate among different nationalities. All patients were followed up for 3 months after discharge to record the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). To analyze the relationship between antiplatelet drug resistance and prognosis. Results: there was no significant difference in age, sex, personal history and related disease history between the two groups (P0.05). Clopidogrel resistance was found in 22 patients (17.19%), including 6 Han patients (10.00%) and 16 Uygur patients (23.53%). The difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Aspirin resistance was found in 13 patients (10.16%), including 6 patients (10.00%) in Han nationality and 7 cases (10.29%) in patients with Uygur. There was no significant difference (P < 0.956). There were 16 cases (12.50%) with abnormal MAADP and 3 cases (5.00%) with abnormal MAADP in Han nationality. 13 (19.12%) of Uygur patients were abnormal, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). During the 3-month follow-up, there were 14 patients with major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE),) and 8 patients with normal clopidogrel reaction (clopidogrel). The incidence of clopidogrel resistance was 7.55 and 6 patients with clopidogrel resistance had MACE events, the incidence was 27.27, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The incidence of MACE events in 11 patients with normal aspirin reaction was 9.57, and that in 13 patients with aspirin resistance was 3. The incidence rate was 23.08, the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). There were 9 cases of MACE events in the patients with normal MAADP, and 5 cases had the incidence of MACE events in the patients with abnormal MAADP of 8.04%, the incidence rate was 31.25%, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion there is no difference in aspirin resistance between Han nationality patients and clopidogrel resistance. The incidence of clopidogrel resistance in Uygur patients was higher than that in Han patients. Aspirin resistance after PCI did not increase the incidence of MACE events, while clopidogrel resistance increased the incidence of MACE events.
【学位授予单位】:新疆医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R541.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张兵兵;唐海沁;张勇;周铭;刘铭;钟涛;;血栓弹力图评价冠心病患者抗血小板药物治疗的临床疗效[J];中国临床保健杂志;2015年04期

2 顾梅秀;孙林;王蓓丽;任孝慈;姚珂;郭玮;潘柏申;;血栓弹力图对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者预后的预测作用[J];检验医学;2015年06期

3 龚艳君;屈晨雪;邱林;杨帆;王智;龚岩;袁家颖;李建平;刘兆平;洪涛;;应用血栓弹力图评价经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者抗血小板药物的治疗效果[J];中国介入心脏病学杂志;2015年01期

4 张涌;聂小燕;刘健;史录文;王伟民;;血栓弹力图法与光学比浊法评价急性冠状动脉综合征患者氯吡格雷反应性的临床研究[J];中国介入心脏病学杂志;2015年01期

5 杨雅薇;李攀;陈韬;刘宇;陈启;柳俊梅;马丽萍;;CYP2C19基因型检测对PCI术后氯吡格雷应用的指导作用[J];国际心血管病杂志;2015年01期

6 张龙;钱海燕;武德巍;郑磊;张丽;俞梦越;;稳定性心绞痛合并糖尿病患者的血栓弹力图检测结果分析[J];中国循环杂志;2014年11期

7 刘欣;秦明照;史旭波;刘谦;;TEG评价AMI患者接受抗血小板治疗风险的研究[J];中国医药导刊;2014年11期

8 黄媛;张伟;杨倩琳;张婷;谢之华;;血栓弹力图法与光学比浊法监测氯吡格雷疗效的对比研究[J];现代检验医学杂志;2014年06期

9 陈伟翔;郭素峡;羊镇宇;吴雄波;曹华明;;血小板功能检测与个体化抗血小板治疗[J];中国介入心脏病学杂志;2014年10期

10 王丽丽;李群;康林;李馨;郭晓宁;张涛;;应用血栓弹力图评估ACS患者替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷抗血小板的疗效[J];中国循证心血管医学杂志;2014年03期



本文编号:2146741

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/mpalunwen/2146741.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6c855***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com