当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 医学硕士论文 >

三种镍钛器械对下颌后牙行一次法根管治疗的近期效果评价

发布时间:2018-07-31 09:06
【摘要】:目的:评价三种不同运动模式的镍钛器械联合热牙胶充填技术用于下颌后牙一次法根管治疗的近期疗效观察。方法:将375名于我院就诊年龄为19~68岁且被诊断为慢性根尖周炎的汉族患者纳为研究对象,共375颗下颌后牙(包括第一、二前磨牙及第一、二磨牙),随机分为3组:WaveOne往复运动组,ProTaper Universal连续旋转运动组和Twisted File Adaptive自适应运动组,每组125例研究对象。所有研究对象均采用冠根向法进行根管预备,3%次氯酸钠超声荡洗根管,干燥根管,热牙胶垂直加压技术进行根管恰填。比较三组镍钛器械根管预备平均操作时间;分析一次法根管治疗术后24h、72h及7d的疼痛情况;评价三组患者术后3个月的近期效果。结果:WaveOne组根管预备平均操作时间为(2.14±1.07)min,Twisted File Adaptive组根管预备平均操作时间为(3.08±1.19)min,ProTaper Universal组根管预备平均操作时间为(4.03±1.73)min,三组镍钛器械根管预备平均操作时间差异有统计学意义(P0.001);术后24h及72h三组行一次法根管治疗术后疼痛率差异有统计学意义(P0.05),术后7d三组术后疼痛率无统计学差异(P0.05);比较三组一次法根管治疗术后3个月的有效率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:WaveOne组进行根管预备时间最短,能够提高预备效率;Twisted File Adaptive组进行根管预备,可明显降低术后疼痛反应;WaveOne组和Twisted File Adaptive组术后3个月进行疗效评价,近期临床效果显著。新型镍钛器械进行根管预备,对于感染根管而言可实现一次法根管治疗,对临床推广具有一定意义。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the short-term curative effect of three different movement-mode nickel-titanium instruments combined with hot gum filling technique in the treatment of mandibular posterior teeth with one-time root canal. Methods: a total of 375 mandibular posterior teeth (including first, second premolar and first premolar) were selected from 375 Han nationality patients aged 1968 and diagnosed as chronic periapical periodontitis. Two molars were randomly divided into three groups: ProTaper Universal continuous rotation group and Twisted File Adaptive adaptive motion group. All the subjects were used to prepare the root canal by the method of crown and root direction. The root canal was washed by ultrasonic with 3% sodium hypochlorite, the root canal was dried and the root canal was filled with hot gum vertical pressure technique. The mean operating time of root canal preparation was compared among the three groups, the pain at 24 hours and 7 days after root canal treatment was analyzed, and the short-term effect of 3 months after operation was evaluated in the three groups. Results the mean operating time of root canal preparation was (2.14 卤1.07) min Twisted File Adaptive group (3.08 卤1.19) min ProTaper Universal group was (4.03 卤1.73) min, there was significant difference among the three groups (P0.001). There was significant difference in postoperative pain rate between the three groups at 24 hours and 72 hours after treatment (P0.05), but there was no significant difference in postoperative pain rate in the three groups on the 7th day after operation (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the effective rate between the three groups after 3 months of once root canal therapy (P0.05). Conclusion the root canal preparation time of the 1: WaveOne group is the shortest, which can improve the preparation efficiency. The root canal preparation in the Twisted File Adaptive group can significantly reduce the postoperative pain response and evaluate the curative effect 3 months after operation in both the WaveOne group and the Twisted File Adaptive group. The short-term clinical effect is remarkable. A new type of Nickel-titanium instrument for root canal preparation can be used for the treatment of root canal infection, which is of significance for clinical application.
【学位授予单位】:新疆医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R781.05

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王燕;郭嘉;王茜;潘文婷;余炜伟;;比较两种镍钛器械在不同运动模式下预备根管后牙根裂纹的发生率[J];牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志;2015年09期

2 杨雨虹;唐倩;;往复式运动镍钛器械的研究进展[J];中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版);2015年04期

3 沙琳;;根管治疗中一次法与多次法术后疼痛的临床观察[J];中国实用医药;2015年13期

4 杨俊;魏欣;孙世尧;;Pathfile和Protaper联合预备磨牙弯曲根管的临床评价[J];临床口腔医学杂志;2015年01期

5 唐震宇;蒋士勇;王辉;蓝碧峰;;镍钛机动器械联合不同超声冲洗液对慢性根尖周炎进行一次性根管治疗的临床研究[J];中国组织工程研究;2014年43期

6 梁学萍;孙玉亮;赵今;;AH plus与碧兰两种根充糊剂在根管治疗中的临床疗效评价[J];新疆医科大学学报;2014年09期

7 黄香;陈俊敏;何升腾;;老年人死髓牙一次性根管治疗的临床疗效评价[J];中华老年口腔医学杂志;2014年04期

8 王安阳;史春;宋其义;韩文利;牛卫东;;TF镍钛器械根管成形效果的锥束CT研究[J];牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志;2014年04期

9 黄玉球;;热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压的根管充填效果比较[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2014年09期

10 步江;尼娜;聂彬;包旭英;郭静;侯军衡;;热牙胶根管充填技术对下颌第二磨牙C形根管充填效果的研究[J];中华临床医师杂志(电子版);2013年24期



本文编号:2155100

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/mpalunwen/2155100.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c3dce***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com