AECOPD相关生物标志物水平及意义
[Abstract]:Background: as the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is increasing year by year, according to WHO, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has become the third major cause of global death following ischemic heart disease, the third major cause of death after stroke. At the European annual conference on respiratory studies in London, London, Mr. Zhong Nanshan published a latest epidemiology. The survey data, the prevalence rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the population over 40 years old in our country seems to have risen to 14%. slow resistance lung is not only a major factor affecting the quality of life of the patients, but also the aggravation of the social medical resources, the acute exacerbation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease also aggravates this situation, and the occurrence of acute exacerbation may be also likely to be It is one of the factors to accelerate the progress of the disease, but the diagnosis of the acute exacerbation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is still dependent on the aggravation of the patient's cough, expectoration, and dyspnea. The original treatment can not effectively control the condition. It is necessary to change the treatment plan by relying on the subjective judgment of the patient or the doctor. There are some limitations, and it is easy to have missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the objective indicators that can help the diagnosis of acute exacerbation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods: 50 cases of AECOPD hospitalized patients in Liaoning people's Hospital from January 2016 to December 2016 were selected and 50 patients in the same period of remission period cOPD were selected as the control group. The clinical biomarkers, leukocyte count, neutrophils ratio, CRP, PCT, D-dime were detected respectively. R, FIB, evaluate the diagnostic significance of each index to AECOPD. Results: (1) the levels of leukocyte count, neutrophils ratio, CRP, PCT, D-dimer, FIB in group AECOPD were 9.84 + 4.482,80.18 + 10.880,59.40 + 58.655,0.72 + 0.818752.57 + 1.143, respectively, and 5.83 +. 203.943,3.21 + 0.878., neutrophils count, neutrophils ratio, CRP, PCT, D-dimer, FIB, the area under the R0C line is 0.835,0.832,0.842,0.799,0.684,0.768., respectively, 8.64,71.35,8.50,0.163726.22,3.55 as a truncation point, WBC sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values of 60%, 96%, 94%, 71%, neutrophils, respectively. The proportion of cells were 78%, 74%, 75%, 77%, and CRP were 86%, 72%, 75%, 84%, respectively 62%, 98%, 97%, 72%, respectively, D- two polymers, respectively, FIB respectively, 73%. neutrophils ratio and C- reactive protein, the area under the ROC curve of fibrinogen was 0.864,0.855, higher than the single index. Third, AE In group COPD, there are correlations between WBC and N%, CPR, PCT, D-dimer, FIB, N% and CRP, PCT, D-dimer, there are certain correlations. R=0.312,0.506, the correlation coefficient between D-dimer and FIB is in the 0.543. stable period patients, WBC and N%, CRP, PCT, D-dimer, FIB are correlated (respectively R=0.316,0.460,0.617,0.383,0.330). There was a correlation between PCT and D-dimer (R=0.366), and the correlation coefficient between D-dimer and FIB was 0.438. conclusion: the leukocyte count, the proportion of neutrophils, CRP, PCT, D-dimer, and the FIB level were significantly higher than those of the D-dimer group, which could provide the basis for the diagnosis of disease. The value of diagnosis was higher than that of other groups. The ratio of neutrophils and C- reactive protein were detected, and fibrinogen could effectively improve the diagnostic rate of AECOPD. There was a linear correlation between some biomarkers, among which the correlation between CRP and PCT was the most obvious.
【学位授予单位】:大连医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R563.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张超;姜珊;聂翠娟;李格;王春红;;降钙素原水平在指导AECOPD患者抗生素使用中的应用价值[J];国际呼吸杂志;2016年12期
2 陈晓娟;梅晓冬;;联合检测D-D和FIB对慢阻肺患者肺栓塞风险的预测作用[J];临床肺科杂志;2016年04期
3 徐兴婷;吴倩;段琼;汪伟民;;慢阻肺急性加重期肺功能与血气分析、炎症指标相关性研究[J];临床肺科杂志;2015年05期
4 Tie-Gang Jia;Jian-Qing Zhao;Jian-Hua Liu;;Serum inflammatory factor and cytokines in AECOPD[J];Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine;2014年12期
5 陈建强;;COPD急性加重期纤维蛋白原和D-二聚体水平与预后的关系研究[J];中国全科医学;2014年24期
6 董西华;阿布都外力·吐尼牙孜;杜毅鑫;;PCT和CRP联合检测在细菌性肺炎和支原体肺炎鉴别诊断中的价值[J];广东医学;2014年10期
7 顾洪忠;谢家政;张辉耀;;慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者诱导痰中α-防御素1-3含量与病情程度的相关性研究[J];国际呼吸杂志;2014年01期
8 张立新;叶军;陈亚宝;彭海林;陈秀;刘玲;江爱桂;黄俊星;;外周血粒细胞、单核细胞CD64表达在老年慢性阻塞性肺病急性发作期细菌感染的诊断价值[J];中华临床感染病杂志;2013年05期
9 郭璐;解郑良;刘跃建;;慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期血浆纤维蛋白原水平的变化及临床意义[J];实用医院临床杂志;2012年01期
10 高蔚;翁婷;孟文书;;慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者诱导痰中β-防御素2水平及其与NF-κB的相关性[J];实用医学杂志;2011年24期
,本文编号:2159064
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/mpalunwen/2159064.html