植物源杀松材线虫活性成分的分离鉴定及杀线机理研究
本文选题:松材线虫 + 杀线活性 ; 参考:《青岛大学》2016年博士论文
【摘要】:松材线虫病,又称松萎蔫病(Pine wilt disease,PWD),是松树的一种极具毁灭性的病害,松树一经感染,蔓延迅速,涉及数十种松属植物,包括我国在内的世界多个国家存在疫情,该病已发展为世界性的严重森林病害。松材线虫(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)是松材线虫病主要的病原,松材线虫的防控对于控制松材线虫病至关重要。目前防控松材线虫最直接、有效的杀线虫剂主要是广谱性合成药剂,线虫易产生耐药性,且存在高毒、高残留、污染环境、对非靶标有益生物构成威胁等缺陷,这使得生态友好的天然杀线剂的开发显得尤为迫切。自然界植物资源丰富,植物源杀线剂近些年一直是松材线虫病研究的热点。本实验选择小茴香根、小茴香籽、无花果叶、无花果根、花椒、茼蒿根、独活、苍耳全草、槟榔、鹤虱、艾叶、使君子、石榴皮、百部、蒺藜籽等成本低廉或在开发利用时常被作为副产物的植物原料作为受试材料,采用药物浸渍法对15种原料的乙醇浸提物进行了杀松材线虫活性测试,结果表明无花果叶、无花果根、独活、石榴皮的乙醇提取物具有较强杀松材线虫活性。通过活性追踪,利用柱层析、制备高效液相色谱、重结晶等分离纯化手段从4种植物原料的粗提物中分离得到具有杀松材线虫活性的9种化合物,经质谱、核磁共振波谱等技术鉴定为:补骨脂素1、佛手柑内酯2、蛇床子素3、二氢欧山芹醇当归酸酯4、花椒毒素5、鞣花酸6、安石榴林7、安石榴苷8、柯里拉京9,化合物2-9的杀松材线虫活性均为首次报道。其中补骨脂素1、佛手柑内酯2、蛇床子素3、二氢欧山芹醇当归酸酯4、花椒毒素5和安石榴苷8具有强杀线活性,72 h的LC50值依次为463.32μM,430.08μM,489.17μM,406.74μM,435.66μM,307.08μM。结合强杀松材线虫化合物补骨脂素1、佛手柑内酯2、蛇床子素3、二氢欧山芹醇当归酸酯4、花椒毒素5和安石榴苷8的化学结构和杀线活性进行分析,推测香豆素母核结构苯骈α-吡喃酮为杀线活性的关键;安石榴苷8的强杀松材线虫活性可能是gallagyl基和六羟基联苯二酰基的协同效应所致;6种杀线化合物化学结构中均具有α,β-不饱和羰基,该基团可能对化合物的杀线活性有重要贡献。本实验对分离得到的强杀松材线虫活性化合物补骨脂素1、佛手柑内酯2、蛇床子素3、二氢欧山芹醇当归酸酯4、花椒毒素5和安石榴苷8进行了杀线机理研究。借助体视显微镜、扫描电镜和透射电镜技术,分析了以上6种强杀线活性化合物对松材线虫形态及生理结构的影响:(1)显微镜下观察,补骨脂素1、佛手柑内酯2、蛇床子素3、二氢欧山芹醇当归酸酯4、花椒毒素5对线虫的影响相似,最初活动趋于迟缓但身体严重蜷曲或扭曲,后随时间延长身体逐渐展开,最终趋于僵直,死亡线虫体内多出现异常泡状物或空腔;安石榴苷8处理的线虫,最初较对照身体扭摆加剧,而后活动逐渐迟缓并渐渐趋于僵直,体内多呈现一连串的水泡状结构;(2)扫描电镜结果显示,经6种杀线化合物处理的松材线虫较对照体壁均出现明显的皱缩,线虫虫体经过固定化处理后较对照容易断裂;(3)透射电镜结果表明,杀线化合物处理的线虫较对照出现体内组织与体壁分离现象或异常空腔,细胞不同程度的解体。通过体内、体外试验研究了补骨脂素1、佛手柑内酯2、蛇床子素3、二氢欧山芹醇当归酸酯4、花椒毒素5和安石榴苷8对松材线虫淀粉酶、纤维素酶、乙酰胆碱酯酶、谷胱甘肽S-转移酶等重要催化酶的影响:(1)体外实验表明,6种杀线化合物对线虫淀粉酶、纤维素酶、乙酰胆碱酯酶均有不同程度的抑制作用,安石榴苷8的抑制作用最强,IC50值分别为0.96 m M,1.24 m M,0.60 m M;对于谷胱甘肽S-转移酶,安石榴苷8具有明显的抑制作用,二氢欧山芹醇当归酸酯4具有弱抑制作用,其他4种杀线化合物无明显作用;(2)体内实验表明,受试化合物对于松材线虫体内乙酰胆碱酯酶及谷胱甘肽S-转移酶活性的影响较大。为了更深入了解本研究中最具杀线潜力的安石榴苷8的杀线机理,采用Illumina测序技术对由其处理的松材线虫及对照线虫的转录组进行高通量测序,经过分析,2575条unigenes表达出现显著差异,其中1428条表达上调,1147条表达下调。综合Nr,GO,KOG,KEGG注释结果,推测:松材线虫被安石榴苷8处理后主要通过细胞内噬路径、吞噬体路径、过氧化物酶体路径、MAPK信号通路等途径启动了应急反应;NADH脱氢酶、细胞色素c氧化酶、细胞色素b和电子转移黄素蛋白等呼吸电子传递链相关蛋白,ATP合成酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶等能量代谢相关酶,热休克蛋白,颤搐蛋白以及松材线虫的表皮角质层胶原蛋白等的编码基因是安石榴苷8的重要调控位点,这可能是其杀线的重要原因。采用实时荧光定量PCR(Quantitative real-time PCR,q RT-PCR)技术对通过转录组测序分析筛选出的部分与松材线虫生命活动相关的差异表达基因进行了表达验证,结果与测序数据一致,证实了转录组分析的可靠性。上述研究结果发现为植物源杀松材线虫剂的开发提供了物质基础和理论依据。
[Abstract]:Pine wood nematode disease, also known as Pine wilt disease (PWD), is a devastating disease of pine trees. The pine tree is infected and spread rapidly, involving dozens of species of pine plants, including a number of countries in the world, including our country. The disease has developed into a serious forest disease of the world. Pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophil). Us) is the main pathogen of pine wood nematode disease. The prevention and control of pine wood nematode is very important for controlling pine wood nematode disease. At present, the most direct control of pine wood nematode, effective nematode is broad-spectrum synthetic agent, nematode is susceptible to drug resistance, and there are high toxicity, high residue, pollution environment, and threat to non target organisms, such as threat, and so on. The development of ecological friendly natural wire killing agents is particularly urgent. The natural plant resources are rich in nature. Plant source nematode has been a hot spot in the study of pine wood nematode disease in recent years. This experiment selected fennel root, fennel seed, fig leaf, fig root, pepper, chrysanthemum root, single live, whole grass of Xanthium, areca, crane plant, AI leaf, Artemisia, stone. Pomegranate, 100, Tribulus seeds, and other plant raw materials which are often used as by-products in development and utilization, were used as tested materials. The ethanol extracts of 15 raw materials were tested by drug impregnation. The results showed that the ethanol extracts from the leaves of the fig, fig root, single live and pomegranate skin had strong pine wood. By tracing the nematode, using column chromatography, preparation of high performance liquid chromatography and recrystallization, 9 compounds with the activity of Nematicidal nematode were isolated from the crude extracts of 4 plant materials, and were identified by mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as: bonalin 1, bergamot 2, osthole 3, two Ooe. Apigenic acid Angelica 4, zanthoxylin 5, tannin 6, pomegranate 7, pomegranate 8, korralin 9, and compound 2-9 of pine wood nematode were all reported for the first time. Among them, psoralen 1, citrus actone 2, osthole 3, two parsley Angelica 4, zanthoxylin 5 and pomegranate 8 have strong line activity, and the LC50 value of H is in turn. 463.32 mu M, 430.08 mu, 489.17 mu M, 406.74 mu M, 435.66 mu M, 307.08 mu M. combined with pinewood nematode compound of psoralen 1, bergamot lactone 2, osthole 3, two hydrogen ozonoside 4, zanthoxinin 5 and anoroside 8, the chemical structure and nematide activity were analyzed. The key of sex is that the activity of pinewood nematode 8 in pomegranate glycoside 8 may be caused by the synergistic effect of the two acyl group and six hydroxyl biphenyl group. The chemical structures of the 6 kinds of nemicidal compounds have alpha, beta unsaturated carbonyl groups, and this group may have important contribution to the activity of the compounds. Combination of psoralen 1, citrus analactone 2, osthole 3, two hydrogen ozonoside 4, zanthoxylin 5 and pomegranate 8 were used to study the line killing mechanism. The effects of the above 6 strong nematode compounds on the morphological and physiological structure of pine wood nematode were analyzed with the stereomicograph, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. (1) microscopes Under observation, psoralen 1, bergamot lactone 2, osthole 3, two diosorcicin 4, the effect of zanthoxylin 5 on the nematode is similar, the initial activity tends to slow but the body is seriously curled up or twisted, and then the body gradually expands, eventually tends to be stiff, and the death nematode has abnormal bubbles or cavity in the body of the nematode; pomegranate The nematode treated by glucoside 8 was initially stronger than the control body torsion pendulum, and then the activity gradually slowed down and gradually became rigid, and the body showed a series of vesicular structures. (2) the scanning electron microscope showed that the pine wood nematode treated by 6 kinds of nematidal compounds showed obvious shrinkage compared with the control body wall, and the nematode body was compared to the control after immobilization. (3) the transmission electron microscope showed that the nematode treated nematodes were separated from the body and the body wall or the abnormal cavity, and the cells were disintegrated in different degrees. Through the body, the psoralen 1, the citrus lactones 2, the osthole 3, the two parsley angelicol 4, the zanthoxylin 5 and the pomegranate were studied in vitro. The effect of glucoside 8 on amylase, cellulase, acetylcholinesterase, glutathione S- transferase, and other important catalytic enzymes in pine wood nematode: (1) in vitro experiments showed that 6 kinds of nematidal compounds have different inhibitory effects on nematode amylase, cellulase and acetylcholinesterase. The inhibitory effect of pomegranate 8 is the strongest, and the value of IC50 is 0.96 m M, 1. 24 m M and 0.60 m M; for glutathione S- transferase, pomegranate 8 had obvious inhibitory effect, two HMP 4 had weak inhibitory effect, and the other 4 kinds of line killing compounds had no obvious effect. (2) in vivo experiments showed the effects of the tested compounds on the activity of acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S- transferase in pine wood nematode. In order to understand the mechanism of the killing line of pomegranin 8, which has the most potential to kill line in this study, Illumina sequencing technology was used to sequence the high flux sequence of the transcriptional group of the pine wood nematode and the control nematode. After analysis, there were significant differences in the expression of 2575 unigenes, of which 1428 were up and 1147 were downregulated. Integrated Nr, GO, KOG, KEGG annotation results, we speculated that pine wood nematode was treated mainly by intracellular phagocytosis, phagocytic pathway, peroxisome pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, and other respiratory electron transport chains, such as NADH dehydrogenase, cytochrome c oxidase, cytochrome b and electron transfer flavin protein, after treatment with pomegranate 8. Related protein, ATP synthetase and beta glucosidase, energy metabolism related enzymes, heat shock protein, twitching protein, and collagen of epidermal cuticle of pine wood nematode are important regulatory sites of pomegranate 8. This may be an important reason for its line killing. Real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (Quantitative real-time PCR, Q RT) is used. -PCR) verifying the differentially expressed genes related to the life activity of pine wood nematode through the sequence analysis of the transcriptional sequence analysis. The results were consistent with the sequencing data and confirmed the reliability of the transcriptional analysis. The results of the study found the material basis and theoretical basis for the development of plant source pine wood nematode.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S763.18
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王明祖,肖炎农,谢帮志;湖北省发现松材线虫[J];湖北植保;2000年01期
2 朱宏斌,安榆林,沈培垠;采用新技术提高松材线虫检出率[J];中国检验检疫;2000年11期
3 张志辉;陈艳;;“森林纵火犯”凯觎中国万里青山——中国开始对美、日松材线虫说不[J];大经贸;2000年01期
4 郁银华,蒋晓鲁;外高桥口岸截获松材线虫的情况分析[J];植物检疫;2001年04期
5 莫明和,周薇,赵明莲,张克勤;节丛孢属丝孢菌对松材线虫和拟松材线虫的捕食[J];微生物学通报;2002年03期
6 爱农;;松材线虫快鉴难关攻克[J];农药市场信息;2002年18期
7 蒋立琴,郑经武;区分松材线虫和拟松材线虫的生化及分子鉴别方法[J];植物检疫;2003年02期
8 张明明 ,王忠金;黄山如何持续预防松材线虫[J];安徽林业;2003年03期
9 谈家金,冯志新;2个细菌菌株对松材线虫存活与繁殖的影响[J];植物病理学报;2003年06期
10 王明旭;松材线虫分子生物学检测技术研究进展[J];湖南林业科技;2004年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 刘会香;申卫星;郭慧玲;迟元凯;谭亚军;周长忠;;松材线虫入侵泰山的可能性分析[A];第二届中国林业学术大会——S5 森林病害及其防治论文集[C];2009年
2 陈凤毛;叶建仁;吴小芹;;松材线虫两种实用分子检测技术[A];全国生物多样性保护及外来有害物种防治交流研讨会论文集[C];2008年
3 徐培方;;口岸松材线虫传播特点及检疫对策[A];江苏省植病、昆虫学会通讯2——江苏省松材线虫病研讨会论文集[C];2003年
4 曹爱新;刘杏忠;路炳声;;松材线虫实时荧光PCR检测技术的研究[A];中国植物病理学会2004年学术年会论文集[C];2004年
5 张永宏;李凯兵;;口岸快速检疫松材线虫技术初探[A];外来有害生物检疫及防除技术学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2005年
6 马海宾;梁军;吕全;张星耀;康丽华;;松材线虫与拟松材线虫迁移扩散能力研究[A];第二届中国林业学术大会——S5 森林病害及其防治论文集[C];2009年
7 戴素明;肖启明;谢丙炎;;松材线虫(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)对温度胁迫适应的分子生态机制[A];生物入侵与生态安全——“第一届全国生物入侵学术研讨会”论文摘要集[C];2007年
8 黄启星;成新跃;茆振川;王运生;赵莉蔺;闫霞;Virginia R.Ferris;徐汝梅;谢丙炎;;松材线虫(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)microRNA组研究[A];第三届全国生物入侵大会论文摘要集——“全球变化与生物入侵”[C];2010年
9 贲爱玲;戚建光;张宏娟;陈玲;韩正敏;;松材线虫与其携带细菌关系[A];第三届全国生物入侵大会论文摘要集——“全球变化与生物入侵”[C];2010年
10 齐文静;闫凡峰;张宗侠;曹阳;刘振宇;;松材线虫乙酰胆碱酯酶的活力测定及基因克隆[A];第三届全国生物入侵大会论文摘要集——“全球变化与生物入侵”[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 祝日耀 刘达富 刘允义;江山连续30年无松材线虫疫情发生[N];中国绿色时报;2013年
2 张恺邋广一;南京入境板材中首次发现松材线虫[N];中国国门时报;2007年
3 记者 甘勇 通讯员 周卫平;松材线虫快速取样技术试验成功[N];湖北日报;2007年
4 张健康;浙江松材线虫防治实现双下降[N];中国绿色时报;2006年
5 林森;浙江加强松材线虫病疫木源头管理[N];中国绿色时报;2007年
6 记者 齐联;检疫不严放跑松材线虫[N];中国绿色时报;2007年
7 于飞;惠州口岸发现活体拟松材线虫[N];中国国门时报;2008年
8 本报记者 马文生;都是松材线虫惹的祸[N];中国国门时报(中国出入境检验疫报);2002年
9 记者 杨怀周 通讯员 刘长实;综合防治松材线虫[N];连云港日报;2009年
10 通讯员陈向 姚丽 记者汤晓峰;国检严防松材线虫“偷渡”[N];南通日报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 戴素明;松材线虫(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)对温度胁迫适应的分子生态机制研究[D];湖南农业大学;2007年
2 程功;Docker生物云计算平台分析松材线虫高通量测序数据的应用研究[D];东北林业大学;2015年
3 王璇;松材线虫CYP450基因致病机理研究[D];中国林业科学研究院;2016年
4 丁晓磊;基于高通量测序的松材线虫致病机理与毒力差异研究[D];南京林业大学;2016年
5 郭群群;植物源杀松材线虫活性成分的分离鉴定及杀线机理研究[D];青岛大学;2016年
6 潘红伟;松材线虫(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)在我国的潜在分布区研究[D];中国林业科学研究院;2009年
7 贲爱玲;松材线虫体表优势细菌的分离及定殖能力研究[D];南京林业大学;2010年
8 张锴;受松材线虫侵染的马尾松抑制消减文库构建与表达谱分析[D];中国林业科学研究院;2010年
9 田雪亮;松材线虫和拟松材线虫伴生细菌多样性及生态功能研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2010年
10 刘宝军;松材线虫择偶对策及择偶偏向的转录组分析[D];中国林业科学研究院;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 林静雯;松材线虫的早期诊断、快速检测技术及松材线虫与拟松材线虫的差异蛋白质组研究[D];厦门大学;2008年
2 刘颖;松材线虫和拟松材线虫的差异蛋白质组学研究[D];厦门大学;2007年
3 齐文静;松材线虫运动行为及其神经递质乙酰胆碱的相关研究[D];山东农业大学;2012年
4 黄瑞芬;中国不同地理种群松材线虫的耐寒性研究[D];北京林业大学;2015年
5 周勇;苏云金芽胞杆菌BRC-XQ12菌株挥发性物质对松材线虫的作用[D];福建农林大学;2012年
6 林璐璐;松材线虫的形态学观察及细菌对松材线虫表达的影响[D];青岛大学;2015年
7 李子;杀松材线虫海洋真菌H-21的分离鉴定、培养条件及其活性物质研究[D];青岛大学;2015年
8 王德朋;氧硫化碳及其混剂熏杀松材线虫效果研究[D];北京林业大学;2016年
9 陈聪聪;杀松材线虫海洋放线菌HT-8的分离鉴定、培养条件及其活性物质分析[D];青岛大学;2016年
10 王林松;松材线虫山梨醇脱氢酶基因的克隆与功能性研究[D];青岛大学;2016年
,本文编号:1931410
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/nykjbs/1931410.html