德勒兹生成文学思想研究
发布时间：2018-07-22 11:06
【摘要】：本文旨在通过对德勒兹(和瓜塔里)论述文学的著作和材料的细读与梳理,以生成思想为核心,试图比较系统地绘制出德勒兹的文学思想和观念。本文对德勒兹文学理论的构建从两条线索展开,一是通过突破语言的界限,创造语言的新功能实现生成文学创作,二是通过瓦解主体的虚假统一性,不断生成他者进行生成文学创作。最后指出,生成文学创作的前提是明确生成的基础,其次是创造有效的生成通道。同时指明,生成文学没有自己的文学史,具有一定的实用价值和政治意义。 本文首先勾勒德勒兹的生平及学术思想轨迹,初步明晰生成思想在他哲学思想中的位置。继而围绕生成思想对国内外的相关研究资料进行梳理,廓清德勒兹文学研究现状,然后阐明本文选题的思路及研究内容,确立从生成角度研究德勒兹文学思想的合理性和可行性。德勒兹明确指出,生成文学的独特性在于文学可以通过创造感觉聚块进行创造,这样的感觉聚块必须是给予人们全新的体验,为人与人、社会和世界之间的思考方式提供新的桥梁。从德勒兹的论述生成文学的材料看,生成文学不是文学创作手法的创制,而是通过文学的方式对强势存在和权力系统不断弱化的结果。语言在具体的应用中,和社会权力形成同构,从而获得表达的合法性。生成文学在文学空间中通过创造新的语言形式和用法,在突破合法语言表达形式的同时,也动摇了与之同构的社会配置,这种新的语言表达形式,形成了弱势文学的独特文学现象,创造了去—物质性的符号世界,配置出一部多样体的文学机器,既构建了一个新的艺术空间,同时也指涉着尚未成形的社会权力形式。在对主体权威性地位的攻击中,生成文学通过生成—动物取消了人类自身的同一性,通过生成—女人动摇了男性中心秩序的合法性,通过不断生成—难以感知者,不断突破人类感知方式的阈限,为世界创造和增添全新的维度。 本文的结论是,生成文学是一种全新的文学现象,明确生成的基础是进行生成文学创作的前提,确定生成的通道和策略是生成文学创作的关键。生成文学没有自己的文学史,是一种不合时宜的实用主义文学,它具有潜在的革命性与社会价值。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to make a detailed reading and combing of the works and materials of Deleuze (and Guatari) on literature, taking the generative thought as the core, and trying to draw out Deleuze's literary thoughts and ideas in a more systematic way. In this paper, the construction of Deleuze's literary theory starts from two clues: one is to create literary creation by breaking through the boundary of language and to create new functions of language, and the other is to disintegrate the false unity of the subject. The generation of the other is the creation of literary creation. Finally, it is pointed out that the premise of generating literary creation is the basis of explicit generation, followed by the creation of effective generation channels. At the same time, it is pointed out that the generation of literature has certain practical value and political significance without its own literary history. This paper first outlines Deleuze's life and academic thoughts, and clarifies the position of generative thought in his philosophical thought. Then combing the relevant research materials at home and abroad around the generative thought, clarifying the current situation of Deleuze literature research, and then clarifying the ideas and research content of this topic. To establish the rationality and feasibility of the study of Deleuze's literary thought from the perspective of generation. Deleuz made it clear that the uniqueness of creating literature is that it can be created by creating sensory chunks, which must give people a new experience and be personal. The way of thinking between society and the world provides a new bridge. From the point of view of the materials from which Deleuze discusses the creation of literature, the generation of literature is not the creation of literary creation techniques, but the result of the strong existence and the weakening of power system through the way of literature. Language in concrete application, and social power form isomorphism, thus obtain the legitimacy of expression. By creating new forms of language and usage in literary space, the generation of literature breaks through the legal forms of language expression, and at the same time shakes the social configuration of its isomorphism, which is a new form of language expression. It has formed the unique literary phenomenon of weak literature, created the symbolic world of de- materiality, and configured a literary machine of various forms, which not only constructs a new artistic space, but also refers to the form of social power that has not yet taken shape at the same time. In the attack on the authoritative position of the subject, the generative literature removes the identity of the human being by generation-animal, by generation-woman shakes the legitimacy of the male-centered order, by constantly generating the unperceptible. Constantly breaking through the threshold of human perception, creating and adding new dimensions to the world. The conclusion of this paper is that the generation of literature is a new literary phenomenon, and the basis of creation is the premise of literary creation, and the key to the creation of literature is to determine the channel and strategy of generation. Generating literature without its own literary history is an anachronistic pragmatic literature with potential revolutionary and social value.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：I109
本文编号：2137240
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to make a detailed reading and combing of the works and materials of Deleuze (and Guatari) on literature, taking the generative thought as the core, and trying to draw out Deleuze's literary thoughts and ideas in a more systematic way. In this paper, the construction of Deleuze's literary theory starts from two clues: one is to create literary creation by breaking through the boundary of language and to create new functions of language, and the other is to disintegrate the false unity of the subject. The generation of the other is the creation of literary creation. Finally, it is pointed out that the premise of generating literary creation is the basis of explicit generation, followed by the creation of effective generation channels. At the same time, it is pointed out that the generation of literature has certain practical value and political significance without its own literary history. This paper first outlines Deleuze's life and academic thoughts, and clarifies the position of generative thought in his philosophical thought. Then combing the relevant research materials at home and abroad around the generative thought, clarifying the current situation of Deleuze literature research, and then clarifying the ideas and research content of this topic. To establish the rationality and feasibility of the study of Deleuze's literary thought from the perspective of generation. Deleuz made it clear that the uniqueness of creating literature is that it can be created by creating sensory chunks, which must give people a new experience and be personal. The way of thinking between society and the world provides a new bridge. From the point of view of the materials from which Deleuze discusses the creation of literature, the generation of literature is not the creation of literary creation techniques, but the result of the strong existence and the weakening of power system through the way of literature. Language in concrete application, and social power form isomorphism, thus obtain the legitimacy of expression. By creating new forms of language and usage in literary space, the generation of literature breaks through the legal forms of language expression, and at the same time shakes the social configuration of its isomorphism, which is a new form of language expression. It has formed the unique literary phenomenon of weak literature, created the symbolic world of de- materiality, and configured a literary machine of various forms, which not only constructs a new artistic space, but also refers to the form of social power that has not yet taken shape at the same time. In the attack on the authoritative position of the subject, the generative literature removes the identity of the human being by generation-animal, by generation-woman shakes the legitimacy of the male-centered order, by constantly generating the unperceptible. Constantly breaking through the threshold of human perception, creating and adding new dimensions to the world. The conclusion of this paper is that the generation of literature is a new literary phenomenon, and the basis of creation is the premise of literary creation, and the key to the creation of literature is to determine the channel and strategy of generation. Generating literature without its own literary history is an anachronistic pragmatic literature with potential revolutionary and social value.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：I109
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 莫言;文学创作的民间资源——在苏州大学“小说家讲坛”上的讲演[J];当代作家评论;2002年01期
2 陈永国;德勒兹思想要略[J];外国文学;2004年04期
3 黄文前;;德勒兹和加塔利精神分裂分析的基本概念及其特点[J];国外理论动态;2007年10期
4 于奇智;后现代思想家G．德勒兹[J];国外社会科学;1996年05期
5 吕翔;德勒兹与经验主义形而上学[J];兰州学刊;2004年03期
6 莫言,杨扬;小说是越来越难写了[J];南方文坛;2004年01期
7 程党根;异域中的异样主体之维——德勒兹视域中的后现代主体模式[J];南京社会科学;2003年06期
8 伊莎贝拉·伽霍尔;夏莹;;德勒兹、马克思与革命:如何理解“仍是马克思主义者”的内涵[J];江海学刊;2010年05期
9 邹广文;;如何进入哲学的思考[J];理论视野;2012年11期
10 潘于旭;;德勒兹的差异与文本革命[J];青海社会科学;2006年03期
，本文编号：2137240
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/2137240.html
