藏缅语族语言使动范畴研究
发布时间：2018-11-06 13:32
【摘要】：使动语法范畴是藏缅语族语言一个古老、普遍的语法范畴。由于语言历史的分化和演变,各藏缅语使动范畴的面貌呈现出了不平衡的特点:有的语言形态(前缀、屈折变化)还占有绝对优势,有的语言形态已经完全消失,有的语言则兼用形态和分析手段。本文以国内20多种藏缅语作为代表,以使动语法意义的三个类别作为线索,探讨了藏缅语使动语法范畴以及不同语法形式、语法手段的历史演变规律。本论文包括6章,第1章导言主要介绍了本文的选题意义、前人研究、语料来源及其研究方法。第2章对使动范畴的概念进行界定,第3章根据现掌握材料,选取几种语言,对比、考察原始藏缅语使动前缀*s-对词根的影响在各种藏缅语里的具体不同表现形式。第4章讨论各种语言的分析形式的发生机制以及它们之间的关系。第5章主要通过列举几种具有代表性的藏缅语,考察形态和分析手段在表达使动意义类别方面的关系,或者说是形态和分析形式在表达使动意义类别方面的倾向性。第6章结语归纳了藏缅语的使动语法范畴经过长期的历史演变、发展,形成了语法手段各异,语法形式多样化的一种范畴。
[Abstract]:The category of causative grammar is an ancient and universal grammatical category of Tibetan and Burmese languages. Due to the division and evolution of language history, the Tibetan and Burmese languages present an unbalanced feature: some language forms (prefixes, inflectional changes) still have an absolute advantage, and some language forms have completely disappeared. Some languages use both morphological and analytical means. Taking more than 20 kinds of Tibetan and Burmese languages as the representative and the three categories of the meaning of the verb grammar as the clue, this paper probes into the historical evolution of the grammatical categories and the different grammatical forms and grammatical means of the Tibetan and Burmese languages. This thesis consists of six chapters. The first chapter introduces the significance of the topic, the previous studies, the source of the corpus and its research methods. The second chapter defines the concept of the moving category. Chapter 3 selects several languages according to the available materials, and compares the influence of the original Tibetan and Burmese prefix * s- on the root in various Tibetan and Burmese languages. Chapter 4 discusses the mechanism of analytical forms of various languages and their relationships. The fifth chapter mainly through enumerates several kinds of representative Tibetan and Burmese languages, examines the relations between the form and the analysis means in the expression causes the dynamic meaning category aspect, or is the form and the analytical form in the expression causes the dynamic meaning category aspect tendency. In the sixth chapter, the author summarizes the category of the Tibetan and Burmese language, which has evolved through a long period of history and developed into a category with different grammatical means and various grammatical forms.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H42
本文编号：2314425
[Abstract]:The category of causative grammar is an ancient and universal grammatical category of Tibetan and Burmese languages. Due to the division and evolution of language history, the Tibetan and Burmese languages present an unbalanced feature: some language forms (prefixes, inflectional changes) still have an absolute advantage, and some language forms have completely disappeared. Some languages use both morphological and analytical means. Taking more than 20 kinds of Tibetan and Burmese languages as the representative and the three categories of the meaning of the verb grammar as the clue, this paper probes into the historical evolution of the grammatical categories and the different grammatical forms and grammatical means of the Tibetan and Burmese languages. This thesis consists of six chapters. The first chapter introduces the significance of the topic, the previous studies, the source of the corpus and its research methods. The second chapter defines the concept of the moving category. Chapter 3 selects several languages according to the available materials, and compares the influence of the original Tibetan and Burmese prefix * s- on the root in various Tibetan and Burmese languages. Chapter 4 discusses the mechanism of analytical forms of various languages and their relationships. The fifth chapter mainly through enumerates several kinds of representative Tibetan and Burmese languages, examines the relations between the form and the analysis means in the expression causes the dynamic meaning category aspect, or is the form and the analytical form in the expression causes the dynamic meaning category aspect tendency. In the sixth chapter, the author summarizes the category of the Tibetan and Burmese language, which has evolved through a long period of history and developed into a category with different grammatical means and various grammatical forms.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H42
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 戴庆厦;论景颇语在藏缅语中的地位[J];云南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年01期
2 江获;藏缅语言元音的上移和下移演化[J];民族语文;2001年05期
3 吴安其;;周代西部方言的藏缅语底层词[J];民族语文;2007年03期
4 李华平;;藏缅语人称标记的语法功能[J];康定民族师范高等专科学校学报;2009年05期
5 余成林;;藏缅语的话题标记——兼与汉语比较[J];中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年01期
6 黄布凡;藏缅语的“马”与古汉语的“欩”[J];中央民族学院学报;1989年02期
7 孙宏开;;论藏缅语语法结构类型的历史演变(续)[J];民族语文;1992年06期
8 黄树先;;汉文古籍中的藏缅语借词“吉量”[J];民族语文;1993年02期
9 朱艳华;;藏缅语工具格的类型及源流[J];民族语文;2010年01期
10 田静;;藏缅语名词性别意义的表达方式[J];中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年04期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 杨将领;藏缅语族语言使动范畴研究[D];上海师范大学;2017年
2 吴铮;藏缅语否定范畴研究[D];中央民族大学;2007年
3 田静;藏缅语宾语比较研究[D];中央民族大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 施维;藏缅语给予类双及物结构类型比较研究[D];上海师范大学;2014年
2 陈仕君;藏缅语的比较句研究[D];上海师范大学;2014年
，本文编号：2314425
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/2314425.html
