汉语家庭交流中建议会话分析
[Abstract]:This paper uses conversational analysis to describe the conversational structure of family advice. Study how people give advice, ask for advice, and respond to it in family communication. Based on the description of the proposed conversational structure, this paper interprets the proposed conversational structure from the perspective of concern. The introduction mainly introduces the research object, the research question, the research value, the research thought, the conversational analysis research method, the corpus situation. Chapter 1 is a review of research. Most of the achievements of foreign research on constructive conversation come from institutional conversation. The research focuses on the asymmetry of the information between the two parties in the organizational conversation, and the constraints of the organizational operation director on the suggested conversational structure. Chapter 2 is the nature and structure of the session. The content of this chapter is the basis of this paper. Based on the definition of Searl (1969), three behavioral characteristics of instruction, information and benefit are proposed. Based on the communicative intention model of Lu Mingchen (2005), this paper proposes a suggested intention model. The unit of conversation analysis in this paper is the suggested sequence cluster-suggested sequence-recommended adjacent pair. Suggestions are intended to be used as persuasion, reminder, and instruction in family communication. Chapter 3 is persuasion. Persuasion sequence cluster is an important feature of persuasive conversation structure. Projection of subsequent root persuasion sequence based on predictive persuasion sequence. Instruction foreshadowing persuasion sequence is the most common sequence, the sequence is prior to information prediction persuasion sequence and beneficial predictive persuasion sequence. The study of persuading adjoining pairs found that locational persuasion is the most common problem, both express persuasion and implicit persuasion. Responsive location persuasion is often used as a response to an inquiry or a question statement. Persuasion responses include bare pole acceptance, bare pole rejection, self-explanation refusal, third party interpretive rejection, inter-turn silence, and informed and independent response. Chapter 4 is a reminder. The cluster of reminder sequences is composed of problem emergence sequences and reminder sequences. Both problem emergence sequences and reminder sequences are root sequences, which form a trigger relationship. Multiple reminders, multi-step reminders, and multi-person reminders together constitute complex reminder sequences. The study of adjoining pairs of reminders found that the alerting behavior only appeared in the position of origin language, which was divided into newspaper reminders and worried reminders. Responses to reminders include bare pole acceptance, bare bar rejection, interpretive rejection, and informed state independent response. Chapter 5 is an instruction. The triggered end sequence cluster is composed of an order sequence and an end sequence, and the order cluster category reflects the greeting characteristics of the order sequence. The study of ordering adjoining pairs found that instruction was more flexible in the middle of adjacent pairs. Not only can it appear in the position of the origin language, but also it can be used as a response to the behavior of farewell. Responses include smooth acceptance, informed and independent responses, topic-shifting responses, perfunctory responses. Chapter 6 is the Chinese family suggestion conversation structure. Persuasive conversational structure tends to solve problems, reminding conversational structure tends to prompt information, and instructing conversational structure tends to regulate interpersonal relationships. Subject to the care principle of the family, it suggests that the conversational structure presents the structural characteristics of being sensitive to problems, giving advice and seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages. The conclusion summarizes the research conclusions, points out the limitations of the research, and puts forward further research ideas.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:H136
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 毛延生;黄倩倩;;网络语境下建议行为的语用机制研究[J];语言教学与研究;2016年03期
2 于国栋;石昊;;作为回应的第二评价与知识优先[J];科学技术哲学研究;2016年01期
3 徐默凡;;“重要的事情说三遍”有用吗——网络语言中的极致用法[J];咬文嚼字;2015年09期
4 吴亚欣;周晓丽;;语用学与会话分析之比较[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年04期
5 王立军;吕明臣;;信息传递中“说服”类交际意图及其实现条件研究[J];图书馆学研究;2015年07期
6 任育新;;学术互动中权势关系建构的语用分析[J];现代外语;2015年02期
7 王立军;吕明臣;;信息传递中交际主体显性角色对“说服”效果的影响[J];图书馆学研究;2015年06期
8 任育新;;国外建议行为研究述评[J];外语教学理论与实践;2014年04期
9 姜望琪;;语用推理之我见[J];现代外语;2014年03期
10 权彤;于国栋;;中日“知识优先”评价比较研究——以话语标记“我跟你讲”和“よ”为例[J];科学技术哲学研究;2014年03期
相关博士学位论文 前7条
1 王立军;说服类言语交际研究[D];吉林大学;2015年
2 刘娅琼;汉语会话中的否定反问句和特指反问句研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
3 李梅;半机构性话语中的他人修正[D];上海外国语大学;2008年
4 刘兴兵;中国医患门诊会话的语用研究[D];华中师范大学;2008年
5 赵微;指令行为与汉语祈使句研究[D];复旦大学;2005年
6 马文;汉语会话中的照应修正研究[D];上海外国语大学;2004年
7 廖美珍;问答:法庭话语互动研究[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2002年
,本文编号:2360606
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/2360606.html