国际期刊论文的言据性分析：认知功能视角
发布时间：2021-09-05 13:37
语言不仅可以用来传递信息和表征客观世界,还可以表达情感、态度和立场等。言据性（evidentiality）指说话人利用语言编码对所述命题信息、知识来源以及对信息、知识可靠程度的说明,在语法层的体现称为“据素”或“据素标记”（房红梅,2005:vi）。作为一种重要的语言机制,言据性不仅涉及到发话人所提供信息的来源、信息获得的模式、信息的可靠性,还涉及到发话人在交际过程中对信息的来源及准确性所承担的责任。期刊论文是科研人员以书面语言的形式向学术共同体成员提出新问题、新观点、新理论,新趋势和新结论的一种媒介。一方面,期刊论文应客观严谨,作者应当客观地陈述事实;另一方面,作者在报告客观研究成果的同时需要阐明个人的立场、态度,竭尽全力说服读者认同论文的观点和结论。期刊论文中的学术观点“言之有据、言而有信”正是言据性所探讨的问题核心。因此,开展期刊论文中的言据性研究具有重要的理论和实际价值。由于言据性在语言交际中的普遍性和重要性,众多学者从多种视角、采用多种研究方法对其进行了描写和解释。本研究首先回顾了近几十年间不同理论视角下的言据性研究历程,总结了国内外多项有关期刊论文中言据性的实证研究。在此基...
【文章来源】：浙江大学浙江省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：402 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
摘要(Abstract in Chinese)
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Definitions of evidentiality
1.1.1 Evidentiality in narrow sense
1.1.2 Evidentiality in broad sense
1.1.3 Working definition of evidentiality in this study
1.2 Rationale of the study
1.2.1 Why study evidentiality?
1.2.2 Why study evidentiality in journal research articles?
1.2.2.1 Research articles
1.2.2.2 Previous empirical studies on evidentiality
1.2.2.3 Limitations of previous studies on evidentiality
1.2.3 Why from the cognitive functional perspective?
1.2.3.1 Previous approaches to evidentiality
1.2.3.2 Limitations of previous approaches on evidentility
1.3 Objectives and research questions
1.4 Methodology and data source
1.4.1 The corpora
1.4.2 Annotation method
1.4.3 Analytical procedure
1.5 Originality of this study
1.6 Organization of the dissertation
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Classification of evidentiality
2.1.1 Previous studies on classifications of evidentiality
2.1.2 Classification of evidentiality of this study
2.2 Lexico-grammatical realizations of evidentials
2.2.1 Direct evidentials
2.2.1.1 Visual evidentials
2.2.1.2 Non-visual evidentials
2.2.2 Indirect evidentials
2.2.2.1 Inferred evidentials
2.2.2.2 Reported evidentials
2.2.3 Evidential strategies
2.2.3.1 Irrealis moods
2.2.3.2 Perfect tenses
2.2.3.3 Passives
2.2.3.4 Complementation
2.2.3.5 Person-marking
2.2.3.6 Quotations
2.2.4 Evaluative evidentials
2.2.4.1 Good-bad parameters
2.2.4.2 Certainty parameters
2.2.4.3 Expectedness/obviousness parameters
2.2.4.4 Importance/relevance parameters
2.3 Evidentiality and other grammatical and semantic categories
2.3.1 Evidentiality and subjectivity
2.3.2 Evidentiality and affect
2.3.3 Evidentiality and stance
2.3.4 Evidentiality and hedge
2.3.5 Evidentiality and evaluation
2.3.6 Evidentiality and appraisal
2.3.7 Evidentiality and epistemic modality
2.4 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Cognitive functional linguistics
3.2 Relevance theory
3.2.1 Cognitive effects
3.2.1.1 Contextual strengthening
3.2.1.2 Contextual contradiction and elimination
3.2.1.3 Contextual implication
3.2.2 Cognitive principles of relevance
3.2.3 Communicative principle of relevance
3.3 Subjectivity
3.3.1 Perspective space
3.3.1.1 Direct mode
3.3.1.2 Indirect mode
3.3.1.3 Free indirect mode
3.3.1.4 Implicit perspectives
3.3.2 Epistemological stance
3.3.2.1 Personal experience epistemological stance
3.3.2.2 Inferential epistemological stance
3.3.2.3 Reportive epistemological stance
3.3.2.4 Factuality epistemological stance
3.3.2.5 Imaginative epistemological stance
3.4 Metadiscourse
3.4.1 Textual and interpersonal functions of metadiscourse
3.4.2 Metadiscourse and genre
3.5 Discourse community
3.5.1 Audience
3.5.2 Context
3.6 Conceptual blending theory
3.6.1 A basic diagram of conceptual blending
3.6.2 Online meaning construction based on conceptual blending theory
3.7 Analytical frameworks for the current study
3.7.1 A four-element model of functions of evidentiality in RAs
3.7.2 Cognitive mechanism of lexico-grammatical realizations of evidentiality
3.7.3 Cognitive mechanism of online meaning construction of evidentiality
3.8 Summary
Chapter 4 Frequency and Distribution of Evidentiality
4.1 Frequency of evidentiality
4.1.1 Frequencies of direct evidentials
4.1.2 Frequencies of indirect evidentials
4.1.3 Frequencies of evidential strategies
4.1.4 Frequencies of evaluative evidentials
4.1.5 Frequencies of evidentiality in RAs
4.2 Distribution of evidentiality across generic structures
4.2.1 Generic structures of RAs
4.2.1.1 Abstract section
4.2.1.2 Introduction section
4.2.1.3 Discussion section (conclusion included)
4.2.2 Distribution of evidential types across generic structures
4.2.2.1 Direct evidentials and generic structures of RAs
4.2.2.2 Indirect evidentials and generic structures of RAs
4.2.2.3 Evidential strategies and generic structures of RAs
4.2.2.4 Evaluative evidentials and generic structures of RAs
4.2.2.5 Evidentiality and generic structures of RAs
4.3 Summary
Chapter 5 Interpersonal Functions of Evidentiality
5.1 Evidentiality as a promotion strategy
5.1.1 Evidentiality and promotional nature of RAs
5.1.2 Promotional function of direct evidentials
5.1.3 Promotional function of indirect evidentials
5.1.4 Promotional function of evidential strategies
5.1.5 Promotional function of evaluative evidentials
5.2 Evidentiality as metadiscourse
5.2.1 Evidentiality as interpersonal metadiscourse
5.2.2 Evidentiality as textual metadiscourse
5.3 Evidentiality 沒s author identity ;ndexing strategy
5.3.1 Evidentiality and author's credibility
5.3.2 Evidentiality and balance between author's authority and solidarity
5.3.3 Evidentiality and author's responsibility
5.4 Evidentiality as the stimulus of relevance
5.4.1 Direct evidentials as the stimulus of relevance
5.4.2 Indirect evidentials as the stimulus of relevance
5.4.3 Evidential strategies as the stimulus of relevance
5.4.4 Evaluative evidentials as the stimulus of relevance
5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Cognitive mechanism of lexico-grammatical realizations of evidentiality
6.1 Evidentiality and epistemological stance
6.1.1 Evidentiality and personal experience epistemological stance
6.1.2 Evidentiality and inferential epistemological stance
6.1.3 Evidentiality and reportive epistemological stance
6.1.4 Evidentiality and factuality epistemological stance
6.2 Evidentiality and perspectives
6.2.1 Evidentiality and direct mode
6.2.2 Evidentiality and indirect mode
6.2.3 Evidentiality and implicit perspective
6.3 Evidentiality and discourse community
6.4 Evidentiality and genre
6.5 Lexico-grammatical realizations of evidentiality
6.6 Summary
Chapter 7 Cognitive Mechanism of the Online Meaning Construction of Interpersonal Meanings of Evidentiality
7.1 Online meaning construction of interpersonal meanings of evidentiality
7.2 Online meaning construction of evidentiality as promotion strategy
7.3 Online meaning construction of evidentiality as metadiscourse
7.4 Online meaning construction of evidentiality as author identity indexing strategy
7.5 Online meaning construction of evidentiality as the stimulus of relevance
7.6 Summary
Chapter 8 Conclusions and implications
8.1 Summary of major findings
8.2 Significance of current study
8.3 Pedagogical and research implications
8.4 Limitations and suggestions for future research
References
Appendices
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]中美硕士学位论文的言据性研究[J]. 王淑雯. 当代外语研究. 2016(02)
[2]跨学科博士学位论文摘要的言据性及其人际意义[J]. 俞碧芳. 当代外语研究. 2015(04)
[3]英文学术论文中的作者身份构建:言据性视角[J]. 杨林秀. 外语教学. 2015(02)
[4]英汉语言学学术语篇言据性对比研究[J]. 水无砥,纪永娟. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版). 2015(01)
[5]二语学术写作言据性资源使用的实证研究[J]. 徐昉,龚晶. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2014(04)
[6]大学生英语论文写作的言据性研究[J]. 孙自挥,陈渝. 西南交通大学学报(社会科学版). 2010(05)
[7]理性主义、经验主义与语料库语言学[J]. 梁茂成. 中国外语. 2010(04)
[8]言据性·主观性·主观化[J]. 房红梅,马玉蕾. 外语学刊. 2008(04)
[9]论实据性策略对英语学术书评动态建构的制约作用[J]. 李健雪. 山东外语教学. 2007(05)
[10]英语研究论文的及物性结构与论文交际目标的实现[J]. 庞继贤,陈明瑶. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2007(05)
博士论文
[1]英语科研论文中的言据性[D]. 杨林秀.厦门大学 2009
硕士论文
[1]视角空间理论框架中的言据性现象研究[D]. 徐婷.南京师范大学 2008
本文编号：3385447
【文章来源】：浙江大学浙江省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：402 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
摘要(Abstract in Chinese)
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Definitions of evidentiality
1.1.1 Evidentiality in narrow sense
1.1.2 Evidentiality in broad sense
1.1.3 Working definition of evidentiality in this study
1.2 Rationale of the study
1.2.1 Why study evidentiality?
1.2.2 Why study evidentiality in journal research articles?
1.2.2.1 Research articles
1.2.2.2 Previous empirical studies on evidentiality
1.2.2.3 Limitations of previous studies on evidentiality
1.2.3 Why from the cognitive functional perspective?
1.2.3.1 Previous approaches to evidentiality
1.2.3.2 Limitations of previous approaches on evidentility
1.3 Objectives and research questions
1.4 Methodology and data source
1.4.1 The corpora
1.4.2 Annotation method
1.4.3 Analytical procedure
1.5 Originality of this study
1.6 Organization of the dissertation
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Classification of evidentiality
2.1.1 Previous studies on classifications of evidentiality
2.1.2 Classification of evidentiality of this study
2.2 Lexico-grammatical realizations of evidentials
2.2.1 Direct evidentials
2.2.1.1 Visual evidentials
2.2.1.2 Non-visual evidentials
2.2.2 Indirect evidentials
2.2.2.1 Inferred evidentials
2.2.2.2 Reported evidentials
2.2.3 Evidential strategies
2.2.3.1 Irrealis moods
2.2.3.2 Perfect tenses
2.2.3.3 Passives
2.2.3.4 Complementation
2.2.3.5 Person-marking
2.2.3.6 Quotations
2.2.4 Evaluative evidentials
2.2.4.1 Good-bad parameters
2.2.4.2 Certainty parameters
2.2.4.3 Expectedness/obviousness parameters
2.2.4.4 Importance/relevance parameters
2.3 Evidentiality and other grammatical and semantic categories
2.3.1 Evidentiality and subjectivity
2.3.2 Evidentiality and affect
2.3.3 Evidentiality and stance
2.3.4 Evidentiality and hedge
2.3.5 Evidentiality and evaluation
2.3.6 Evidentiality and appraisal
2.3.7 Evidentiality and epistemic modality
2.4 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
3.1 Cognitive functional linguistics
3.2 Relevance theory
3.2.1 Cognitive effects
3.2.1.1 Contextual strengthening
3.2.1.2 Contextual contradiction and elimination
3.2.1.3 Contextual implication
3.2.2 Cognitive principles of relevance
3.2.3 Communicative principle of relevance
3.3 Subjectivity
3.3.1 Perspective space
3.3.1.1 Direct mode
3.3.1.2 Indirect mode
3.3.1.3 Free indirect mode
3.3.1.4 Implicit perspectives
3.3.2 Epistemological stance
3.3.2.1 Personal experience epistemological stance
3.3.2.2 Inferential epistemological stance
3.3.2.3 Reportive epistemological stance
3.3.2.4 Factuality epistemological stance
3.3.2.5 Imaginative epistemological stance
3.4 Metadiscourse
3.4.1 Textual and interpersonal functions of metadiscourse
3.4.2 Metadiscourse and genre
3.5 Discourse community
3.5.1 Audience
3.5.2 Context
3.6 Conceptual blending theory
3.6.1 A basic diagram of conceptual blending
3.6.2 Online meaning construction based on conceptual blending theory
3.7 Analytical frameworks for the current study
3.7.1 A four-element model of functions of evidentiality in RAs
3.7.2 Cognitive mechanism of lexico-grammatical realizations of evidentiality
3.7.3 Cognitive mechanism of online meaning construction of evidentiality
3.8 Summary
Chapter 4 Frequency and Distribution of Evidentiality
4.1 Frequency of evidentiality
4.1.1 Frequencies of direct evidentials
4.1.2 Frequencies of indirect evidentials
4.1.3 Frequencies of evidential strategies
4.1.4 Frequencies of evaluative evidentials
4.1.5 Frequencies of evidentiality in RAs
4.2 Distribution of evidentiality across generic structures
4.2.1 Generic structures of RAs
4.2.1.1 Abstract section
4.2.1.2 Introduction section
4.2.1.3 Discussion section (conclusion included)
4.2.2 Distribution of evidential types across generic structures
4.2.2.1 Direct evidentials and generic structures of RAs
4.2.2.2 Indirect evidentials and generic structures of RAs
4.2.2.3 Evidential strategies and generic structures of RAs
4.2.2.4 Evaluative evidentials and generic structures of RAs
4.2.2.5 Evidentiality and generic structures of RAs
4.3 Summary
Chapter 5 Interpersonal Functions of Evidentiality
5.1 Evidentiality as a promotion strategy
5.1.1 Evidentiality and promotional nature of RAs
5.1.2 Promotional function of direct evidentials
5.1.3 Promotional function of indirect evidentials
5.1.4 Promotional function of evidential strategies
5.1.5 Promotional function of evaluative evidentials
5.2 Evidentiality as metadiscourse
5.2.1 Evidentiality as interpersonal metadiscourse
5.2.2 Evidentiality as textual metadiscourse
5.3 Evidentiality 沒s author identity ;ndexing strategy
5.3.1 Evidentiality and author's credibility
5.3.2 Evidentiality and balance between author's authority and solidarity
5.3.3 Evidentiality and author's responsibility
5.4 Evidentiality as the stimulus of relevance
5.4.1 Direct evidentials as the stimulus of relevance
5.4.2 Indirect evidentials as the stimulus of relevance
5.4.3 Evidential strategies as the stimulus of relevance
5.4.4 Evaluative evidentials as the stimulus of relevance
5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Cognitive mechanism of lexico-grammatical realizations of evidentiality
6.1 Evidentiality and epistemological stance
6.1.1 Evidentiality and personal experience epistemological stance
6.1.2 Evidentiality and inferential epistemological stance
6.1.3 Evidentiality and reportive epistemological stance
6.1.4 Evidentiality and factuality epistemological stance
6.2 Evidentiality and perspectives
6.2.1 Evidentiality and direct mode
6.2.2 Evidentiality and indirect mode
6.2.3 Evidentiality and implicit perspective
6.3 Evidentiality and discourse community
6.4 Evidentiality and genre
6.5 Lexico-grammatical realizations of evidentiality
6.6 Summary
Chapter 7 Cognitive Mechanism of the Online Meaning Construction of Interpersonal Meanings of Evidentiality
7.1 Online meaning construction of interpersonal meanings of evidentiality
7.2 Online meaning construction of evidentiality as promotion strategy
7.3 Online meaning construction of evidentiality as metadiscourse
7.4 Online meaning construction of evidentiality as author identity indexing strategy
7.5 Online meaning construction of evidentiality as the stimulus of relevance
7.6 Summary
Chapter 8 Conclusions and implications
8.1 Summary of major findings
8.2 Significance of current study
8.3 Pedagogical and research implications
8.4 Limitations and suggestions for future research
References
Appendices
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]中美硕士学位论文的言据性研究[J]. 王淑雯. 当代外语研究. 2016(02)
[2]跨学科博士学位论文摘要的言据性及其人际意义[J]. 俞碧芳. 当代外语研究. 2015(04)
[3]英文学术论文中的作者身份构建:言据性视角[J]. 杨林秀. 外语教学. 2015(02)
[4]英汉语言学学术语篇言据性对比研究[J]. 水无砥,纪永娟. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版). 2015(01)
[5]二语学术写作言据性资源使用的实证研究[J]. 徐昉,龚晶. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2014(04)
[6]大学生英语论文写作的言据性研究[J]. 孙自挥,陈渝. 西南交通大学学报(社会科学版). 2010(05)
[7]理性主义、经验主义与语料库语言学[J]. 梁茂成. 中国外语. 2010(04)
[8]言据性·主观性·主观化[J]. 房红梅,马玉蕾. 外语学刊. 2008(04)
[9]论实据性策略对英语学术书评动态建构的制约作用[J]. 李健雪. 山东外语教学. 2007(05)
[10]英语研究论文的及物性结构与论文交际目标的实现[J]. 庞继贤,陈明瑶. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2007(05)
博士论文
[1]英语科研论文中的言据性[D]. 杨林秀.厦门大学 2009
硕士论文
[1]视角空间理论框架中的言据性现象研究[D]. 徐婷.南京师范大学 2008
本文编号：3385447
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/3385447.html
