一体化理论视域下“一带一路”推进的路径研究
发布时间:2018-03-10 07:18
本文选题:中国 切入点:“一带一路” 出处:《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:当今的世界,国际金融危机的影响还在继续深入,国际格局和国际秩序也正蕴含着深刻变化,各国面临的发展问题依然严峻。具体来说,世界经济相对呈现低迷态势、国际力量对比不断进行调整、国际秩序也进入转型的关键时期,同时,国际上大小冲突不间断,地区热点问题不停歇,个别国家不安分,屡次挑起争端,使世界局势险陷战争边缘。从中国所处的亚太地区来看,随着国际金融危机的持续发酵,与之具有“连锁反应”的社会、宗教、文化、民族等问题也日渐凸显,加之中国的崛起和美国“重返亚太”和“亚太再平衡”战略的提出,这些因子都在某种程度上加剧了亚太地区的“集体无安全感”。目前,无论是国际社会、区域组织还是个体单元,最为关注的问题仍是经济发展和国际安全。面对共同的和平与发展问题,中国政府在国际国内双重背景下推出了“一带一路”,其在某种程度上为满足“一带一路”沿线国家对体系的结构性需求,同时为整个系统地有效运行和满足系统内部需要提供了一股延续的力量。“一带一路”作为新的时期中国对外开放升级版的“大战略”,已经基本完成顶层设计,正逐渐进入到了具体的实施阶段,并已经取得了一些阶段性成果,也表现出了良好的发展前景,有望成为中国处理与周边国家、地区和世界关系以及发展国际区域合作的典范。然而,中国的“一带一路”还处于“初级阶段”,目前国内学界对“一带一路”的研究主要集中在综述类研究、政策类研究、具体的实践性案例方面的研究,而且这几类问题的研究随着国际形势、合作进程和阻力的出现而不断扭转而无法专注。相比而言,关于“一带一路”的理论研究则凤毛麟角,缺乏支撑其向前发展的规范理论和分析框架。就此,本文尝试从一体化及相关理论的视角观察和分析中国的“一带一路”,为中国的“一带一路”提供借鉴并提出假设,即中国的“一带一路”是“冷战后一体化”的又一个表现形式,一体化理论在某种程度上可为中国“一带一路”的未来路径选择提供一个参考。本文写作框架如下:第一部分:系统地阐述了一体化理论的发展演变过程,主要是从理论研究和理论适用两个方面进行阐释。第二部分:试析中国的“一带一路”与一体化的关系。首先,对中国“一带一路”提出的背景进行分析,接下来阐述了“一带一路”的内涵和意义,以及此战略提出后国际社会的反应。其次,尝试在一体化理论框架内对其进行解释和分析。第三部分:按照一体化理论的发展脉络,对中国“一带一路”的未来建构进行了具体的设想,主要从命运共同体、经济共同体和文化认同感三方面展开。最后得出结论:理论的探索和研究作为实践的一部分,不可忽视。正如诸多专家学者所说那样,中国的“一带一路”具有多维尺度,从不同的角度进行分析往往会得出不同的结论。本文需要探知和阐明的是:一体化这一理论和它的实践经验也可为中国的“一带一路”建设提供某种思路。同时,从理论的角度思考,一体化这一理论也并非是一个解释问题的固有的和不变的框架,它是一个不断被建构的概念和理论,也可在中国“一带一路”的实践中不断地丰富和得到发展。
[Abstract]:In today's world, the international financial crisis is still deepening, international pattern and international order also implies a profound change, the development problem faced by all countries is still grim. Specifically, the world economy is relatively sluggish trend, the international balance of power to carry out the adjustment of the international order has entered a critical period of transformation at the same time, the size of continuous conflict, regional hot issues do not stop, individual countries restless, often provoke disputes, the situation of the world depression risk war. From the Asia Pacific region Chinese place, along with the continuous fermentation of the global financial crisis, has a "chain reaction" and the society, religion, culture, ethnic and other issues are also increasingly prominent in addition, Chinese and the rise of the United States to return to Asia and the Asia Pacific rebalancing strategy, these factors are to some extent exacerbated the collective in the Asia Pacific region " A sense of security. At present, both the international community and regional organizations or individual units, the most concern is the economic development and international security. Facing the issues of peace and common development, the government launched the "Chinese Belt and Road Initiative" in the international and domestic background, which is to meet the "The Belt and Road countries along structural the demand of the system to a certain extent, but also provides a continuation of the strength to meet the internal needs and system effective operation of the whole system." The Belt and Road "as the new period Chinese opening an upgraded version of the" grand strategy ", has been basically completed the top-level design, gradually entered into the implementation phase specific, and has made some achievements, also showed a good development prospects, is expected to become the Chinese deal with neighboring countries, regions and the world relations and the development of international regional cooperation model Fan. However, Chinese "The Belt and Road" is still in the primary stage, the research reviews the current domestic academic research mainly focused on "The Belt and Road", policy research, research practice case, and study these problems with the international situation, cooperation process and the resistance and continuous torsion to attention. In contrast, theoretical research on "The Belt and Road" is very rare, the lack of support standard theory and analysis framework for their development. In this connection, this paper attempts to observe from the integration and related theory visual angle and analysis Chinese "The Belt and Road", and put forward the reference assuming China "The Belt and Road", namely "Chinese Belt and Road Initiative" is the "Post Cold War" integration of another form of integration theory to a certain extent can be The Belt and Road China "in the future" The path selection provides a reference. This thesis consists of the following contents: the first part systematically expounds the evolution process of the development of the integration of theory, mainly from the theoretical research and theory for two aspects. The second part: an analysis of the relationship between Chinese "Belt and Road Initiative" and integration. First, the "Chinese Belt and Road Initiative" the background analysis, then expound the meaning and significance of "The Belt and Road", and this strategy after the reaction of the international community. Secondly, try in integration theory within the framework of the interpretation and analysis. The third part: according to the development of the integration of theory, the specific ideas of Belt and Road Initiative Chinese "future construction, mainly from the fate of the community, economic community and cultural identity in three aspects. The final conclusion: theoretical exploration and research as part of the practice, not Can be ignored. As many experts and scholars said, "Chinese Belt and Road Initiative with multidimensional scaling analysis, often draw different conclusions from different angles. This paper need to ascertain and clarify is: the integration of this theory and its practical experience can also provide some ideas for the China" Belt and Road Initiative "construction. At the same time, thinking from the perspective of theory, the integration of this theory is not a natural interpretation of the questions and the same framework, it is a continuous construction of theory and concepts, but also in the" Chinese Belt and Road Initiative "practice and constantly enrich and develop.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F125;D820
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 敖怀;“欧盟制宪与一体化理论”研讨会召开[J];欧洲;2002年04期
2 王重方;评西方“一体化理论”[J];世界经济与政治;1988年07期
3 段胜武;;西方一体化理论巡礼[J];西欧研究;1990年01期
4 郇庆治;欧洲早期一体化理论:社会与文化向度[J];欧洲;2000年03期
5 房乐宪;地区一体化理论的交流主义视角[J];国际论坛;2002年03期
6 王展鹏;;理性选择还是社会建构?——欧洲一体化理论范式之争评析[J];世界经济与政治论坛;2009年02期
7 王展鹏;;理性选择还是社会建构——欧洲一体化理论范式之争评析[J];国际关系学院学报;2009年05期
8 郭韬杰;战后欧洲一体化理论[J];现代国际关系;1999年10期
9 刘俊祥;;国家一体化理论及其对中国边疆稳定机制建设的启示[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年05期
10 房乐宪;欧洲一体化理论中的功能主义[J];教学与研究;2000年10期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 张曙光;;反思一体化理论中的欧洲中心主义[A];中国国际关系理论的建设:借鉴与创新——2011年博士论坛[C];2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 蔡文娟;一体化理论视域下“一带一路”推进的路径研究[D];吉林大学;2017年
,本文编号:1592304
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1592304.html