论行政决策的司法监督

发布时间：2018-04-14 09:04

本文选题：行政决策 + 司法监督　；参考：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：行政决策作为一种普遍存在的行政行为,其涉及的群体之广,处置的利益之大,对社会发展的影响之长远,都决定了其不能处于法律规范监督的灰色地带。如何有效规范行政决策已受到党和国家的高度关注。当前各地政府相继以立法的形式建立起各自的行政决策合法性审查制度,在一定程度上起到了规范行政决策的作用。但应该看到,此类审查制度强调审查的内部性,忽视了行政权力自我规制的弊端。在外部监督上,现有监督制度没有考虑我国国家权力结构设计和权力运作在实践中的特点,在无形之中弱化了外部监督对行政决策的制约。并且,现有行政决策外部监督制度大多将司法机关排除在外,或者仅仅作了简单强调。天然具有监督性质的司法机关被排除在行政决策的监督主体范围之外,不仅不利于全面有效的监督行政决策,也忽视了宪法对司法机关职责的规定,与我国当前重视加强司法机关地位和作用的形势和政策相违背。本文从行政决策实施中存在的问题以及现有监督体系的不足出发,通过分析宪法和法律的规定,结合司法机关在监督行政决策中的优势,得出司法机关监督行政决策的法律依据。在以上法律依据的基础上,本文着重对司法机关如何监督行政决策作出制度设计,以期为行政决策的司法监督提供新的路径和参考。
[Abstract]:As a common administrative behavior, administrative decision-making involves a wide range of groups, the large interests of disposal, and the long-term impact on social development, all of which determine that administrative decision-making cannot be in the gray area where legal norms can not be supervised.How to effectively standardize the administrative decision has been highly concerned by the Party and the state.At present, local governments have established their own legitimacy examination system in the form of legislation, which to a certain extent has played a role in standardizing administrative decision-making.However, it should be seen that this kind of review system emphasizes the internality of review and ignores the malpractice of self-regulation of administrative power.In terms of external supervision, the existing supervision system does not take into account the characteristics of the design of national power structure and the operation of power in practice, and weakens the restriction of external supervision on administrative decision-making.Moreover, the existing administrative decision-making external supervision system mostly excludes the judicial organs, or only makes a simple emphasis.Naturally, the judicial organs with the nature of supervision are excluded from the scope of supervision of administrative decision-making, which is not only unfavorable to the comprehensive and effective supervision of administrative decisions, but also ignores the provisions of the Constitution on the duties of the judicial organs.Contrary to the current situation and policy of strengthening the position and role of the judiciary in our country.Starting from the problems existing in the implementation of administrative decision-making and the deficiencies of the existing supervisory system, this paper analyzes the provisions of the Constitution and the law, and combines the advantages of the judicial organs in the supervision of administrative decisions.The legal basis for judicial supervision of administrative decisions is obtained.On the basis of the above legal basis, this paper focuses on how the judicial organs supervise the administrative decision making system design, in order to provide a new path and reference for the judicial supervision of administrative decision-making.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】