论危险犯中的“自动排除危险状态行为”

发布时间：2018-06-21 04:27

本文选题：危险犯 + 危险状态　；参考：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：自动排除危险状态行为,是指犯罪行为人实施了刑法规定的危害行为,符合刑法分则中规定的危险犯的犯罪构成,但是在产生了足以造成严重的实害结果的法定危险状态之后,实害结果尚未发生之前,行为人又出于自身主观自由意志支配,积极采取的排除先前产生的法定危险状态并使得实害结果没有发生的有效措施。通说观点是只要法定危险状态已经出现,无论行为人是否有自动排除该危险状态行为,都不能阻却危险犯的既遂的认定。但是通说观点饱受诟病,有论者认为,有自动排除危险状态行为的认定为既遂有量刑过重之嫌。但是这这观点在理论上都难以成立。坚持刑法基本理论的通说的地位不容质疑,但是也存在一定的缺陷,坚持刑法的基本理论之下弥补这些缺陷才是解决这一问题的正确方向。具体来说,可以借鉴国内外立法例,参考这些立法中自动排除危险状态行为可以适用的减轻或免除处罚的规定,针对具体的刑法分则条文设置特殊的法定量刑情节,使自动排除危险状态的行为人获得宽大处理,以解决量刑过重的问题。
[Abstract]:The act of automatically excluding dangerous state means that the perpetrator has carried out the harmful act stipulated in the criminal law, which conforms to the constitution of the crime of dangerous crime stipulated in the special provisions of the criminal law, but after producing a legal dangerous state sufficient to cause serious actual harm, Before the actual harm result happened, the actor, out of his own subjective free will, took effective measures to eliminate the legal dangerous state that had been produced before and to make the actual harm result do not happen. The general view is that as long as the legal state of danger has already appeared, no matter whether the actor has the behavior of automatically excluding the dangerous state, it can not prevent the identification of the accomplished of the dangerous offender. But the general view has been criticized, some critics believe that the automatic exclusion of dangerous behavior is considered to be excessive sentencing. But this view is difficult to hold in theory. The position of upholding the general theory of the basic theory of criminal law cannot be questioned, but there are also some defects. The correct direction to solve this problem is to make up for these defects under the basic theory of criminal law. Specifically, we can draw lessons from domestic and foreign legislative examples, refer to the provisions in these legislations that can be applied to mitigate or exempt punishment from acts of automatic exclusion of dangerous state, and set up special statutory circumstances for sentencing in accordance with the specific provisions of the special provisions of the criminal law. Leniency is granted to those who automatically exclude danger to solve the problem of excessive sentencing.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】