行贿罪“为谋取不正当利益”要件去留问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-03 11:00

本文选题：行贿罪 + 谋取不正当利益　；参考：《安徽财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：众所周知,“为谋取不正当利益”要件是我国现行刑法规定的行贿罪之必备犯罪构成要件。所谓利益,是在一定的生产基础上获得的社会内容和特性的需要。不正当利益包括非法利益、非法手段获取利益以及通过不正当手段获取的不确定利益。从发展历程看,该“为谋取不正当利益”要件经历了从无到有,从确立到不断发展的过程。但该要件自确立以来其去留问题,即该要件是否应当成为行贿罪必备要件便成了争论焦点,主要包括“取消说”与“保留说”二元争议观点。通过全面考察域外代表国家、地区以及《联合国反腐败公约》有关行贿罪构成要件规定,发现域外国家地区法律基本没有规定“为谋取不正当利益”为行贿罪犯罪构成要件,且域外对行贿容忍度低,严打收买职务的权钱交易行为的价值理念值得我们借鉴。行贿罪“为谋取不正当利益”要件去留的应然选择是基于对积极行贿行为与消极行贿行为的区分,积极行贿采“取消说”,消极行贿采“保留说”,即在入罪评价积极行贿行为时摆脱“为谋取不正当利益”要件束缚,在评价消极行贿行为时保留“为谋取不正当利益”要件限制,最终实现有效规制行贿行为之目的。
[Abstract]:As we all know, "to seek improper interests" is the essential element of the crime of bribery in the present criminal law of our country. The so-called interest is the need of social content and characteristics obtained on the basis of certain production. Improper interests include illegal interests, illegal means to obtain benefits and uncertain interests obtained through improper means. From the point of view of the development process, the element of "seeking improper interests" has experienced the process from nothing to existence, from establishment to continuous development. However, since its establishment, the issue of whether the element should become the essential element of bribery crime has become the focus of controversy, mainly including the dualistic dispute between "cancellation theory" and "reservation theory". Through a comprehensive investigation of the constitutive requirements of the crime of bribery on behalf of foreign countries, regions and the UN Convention against Corruption, it is found that there is basically no provision in the laws of extraterritorial countries for "seeking improper interests" as the constitutive elements of the crime of bribery. Moreover, the value concept of the right-money trading behavior is worth our reference because of its low tolerance to bribery. The essential choice of the crime of offering bribes is based on the distinction between active bribery and passive bribery. Active bribery adopts "cancellation theory" and passive bribery adopts "reservation theory". That is to say, to get rid of the restraint of "seeking improper interests" in the evaluation of active bribery, and to retain the restriction of "for seeking improper interests" when evaluating passive bribery, so as to achieve the purpose of effective regulation of bribery.
【学位授予单位】：安徽财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】