自由贸易协定保障措施制度研究
发布时间：2018-07-17 01:00
【摘要】：以自由贸易区为主要代表的区域贸易安排近年来逐渐兴起,各国都在积极谈判建立自由贸易区。在自由贸易区迅速发展的同时,贸易救济措施中的保障措施制度尤为各国所重视。在界定自由贸易协定中保障措施概念的基础上,明确其实施条件和类型,分析保障措施制度存在的必要性。NAFTA作为自由贸易区的典范,其中关于保障措施制度的规定较为成熟;《欧盟-加拿大自由贸易协定》和TPP中关于保障措施制度的规定也具有一定的代表性。借鉴上述自由贸易协定中保障措施制度的有益经验,对完善我国自由贸易协定中的保障措施制度具有重要意义。通过分析我国已签订的自由贸易协定中保障措施制度的现状,归结出以下主要问题:全球保障措施的适用缺乏灵活性、实施条件和实施程序不细致;双边保障措施过渡期限和实施期限偏长;争端解决机制有待完善。对此,应当灵活运用全球保障措施,如规定双重贸易救济,适当排除全球保障措施的适用,完善其实施条件和程序;细化双边保障措施的实施条件,适当缩短其过渡期和实施期限;建立预警机制,完善争端解决机制和救济手段。
[Abstract]:The regional trade arrangement, mainly represented by the free trade area, is rising gradually in recent years, and all countries are negotiating actively to establish the free trade area. With the rapid development of free trade zone, the system of safeguard measures in trade relief measures is paid more attention by many countries. On the basis of defining the concept of safeguard measures in free trade agreements, this paper clarifies its implementation conditions and types, and analyzes the necessity of the existence of safeguard measures. NAFTA is the model of free trade area. The provisions of the safeguards system are mature, and the provisions of the EU-Canada Free Trade Agreement and the TPP are also representative. It is of great significance to perfect the safeguard measures system in China's free trade agreements by drawing on the beneficial experience of the safeguard measures system in the above free trade agreements. By analyzing the current situation of the safeguard measures system in the free trade agreements signed by China, the main problems are summarized as follows: the application of global safeguard measures lacks flexibility, the implementation conditions and procedures are not detailed; The transitional period and implementation period of bilateral safeguard measures are too long, and the dispute settlement mechanism needs to be improved. In this regard, global safeguard measures should be applied flexibly, such as the provision of double trade relief, the appropriate exclusion of the application of global safeguard measures, the improvement of their implementation conditions and procedures, and the refinement of the implementation conditions of bilateral safeguards, It should shorten the transition period and implement time appropriately, establish early warning mechanism, perfect dispute settlement mechanism and relief means.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D996.1
本文编号：2128327
[Abstract]:The regional trade arrangement, mainly represented by the free trade area, is rising gradually in recent years, and all countries are negotiating actively to establish the free trade area. With the rapid development of free trade zone, the system of safeguard measures in trade relief measures is paid more attention by many countries. On the basis of defining the concept of safeguard measures in free trade agreements, this paper clarifies its implementation conditions and types, and analyzes the necessity of the existence of safeguard measures. NAFTA is the model of free trade area. The provisions of the safeguards system are mature, and the provisions of the EU-Canada Free Trade Agreement and the TPP are also representative. It is of great significance to perfect the safeguard measures system in China's free trade agreements by drawing on the beneficial experience of the safeguard measures system in the above free trade agreements. By analyzing the current situation of the safeguard measures system in the free trade agreements signed by China, the main problems are summarized as follows: the application of global safeguard measures lacks flexibility, the implementation conditions and procedures are not detailed; The transitional period and implementation period of bilateral safeguard measures are too long, and the dispute settlement mechanism needs to be improved. In this regard, global safeguard measures should be applied flexibly, such as the provision of double trade relief, the appropriate exclusion of the application of global safeguard measures, the improvement of their implementation conditions and procedures, and the refinement of the implementation conditions of bilateral safeguards, It should shorten the transition period and implement time appropriately, establish early warning mechanism, perfect dispute settlement mechanism and relief means.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周曙东;肖宵;杨军;;中韩自贸区建立对两国主要产业的经济影响分析——基于中韩自由贸易协定的关税减让方案[J];国际贸易问题;2016年05期
2 刘瑛;张威加;;从晚近自由贸易协定看CEPA框架下的贸易救济法律制度的完善[J];国际贸易;2015年12期
3 杨海涛;;中国—东盟自贸区争端解决机制的完善[J];人民论坛;2015年02期
4 朱继胜;;也论CAFTA争端解决机制的缺陷与完善[J];河北法学;2015年02期
5 杜江江;;中国—东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制法律问题研究[J];前沿;2014年Z2期
6 徐忆斌;;WTO争端机制中的磋商制度论析[J];中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期
7 张湘兰;田辽;;WTO争端解决机制中透明度问题研究[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年03期
8 王春婕;;区域与WTO管辖权冲突协调机制探析——以NAFTA的实践为例[J];东岳论丛;2012年12期
9 王军有;;中韩FTA争端解决机制刍议[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年11期
10 严蓉;;区域贸易协定下贸易救济制度研究[J];时代法学;2012年05期
，本文编号：2128327
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/2128327.html
